Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
NMSAX vs VSCPX
NMSAX vs VSCPX Comparison
Open Charts NMSAX vs VSCPX
Columbia Small Cap Index A
Price$23.21
Change+$0.33 (+1.44%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets2.56B
Vanguard Small Cap Index InstlPlus
Price$358.11
Change+$3.67 (+1.04%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets161.58B
NMSAX vs VSCPX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
NMSAX vs. VSCPX commentary
Dec 04, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is NMSAX is a Buy and VSCPX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
VSCPX has more cash in the bank: 162B vs. NMSAX (2.56B). VSCPX pays higher dividends than NMSAX: VSCPX (1.34) vs NMSAX (1.17). NMSAX was incepted earlier than VSCPX: NMSAX (29 years) vs VSCPX (15 years). NMSAX (0.45) is less costly to investors than VSCPX (0.03). NMSAX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 23.00 vs. VSCPX (13.00). NMSAX has a lower initial minimum investment than VSCPX: NMSAX (2000) vs VSCPX (100000000). VSCPX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : -0.84 vs. NMSAX (-15.66). VSCPX return over 5 years is better than : 41.17 vs. NMSAX (-1.26).
| NMSAX | VSCPX | NMSAX / VSCPX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.45 | 0.03 | 1,500% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.45 | 0.03 | 1,500% |
| Fund Existence | 29 years | 15 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 0.838 | 7.139 | 12% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 2000 | 100000000 | 0% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 2.56B | 162B | 2% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.17 | 1.34 | 88% |
| Returns for 1 year | -15.66 | -0.84 | 1,869% |
| Returns for 3 years | -6.83 | 32.19 | -21% |
| Returns for 5 years | -1.26 | 41.17 | -3% |
| Returns for 10 years | 16.62 | 132.15 | 13% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers