Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
NMSAX vs VSCPX
NMSAX vs VSCPX Comparison
Open Charts NMSAX vs VSCPX
Columbia Small Cap Index A
Price$22.59
Change+$0.07 (+0.31%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets2.68B
Vanguard Small Cap Index InstlPlus
Price$353.49
Change+$2.47 (+0.70%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets161.26B
NMSAX vs VSCPX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
NMSAX vs. VSCPX commentary
Sep 08, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is NMSAX is a Buy and VSCPX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
VSCPX has more cash in the bank: 161B vs. NMSAX (2.68B). VSCPX pays higher dividends than NMSAX: VSCPX (1.33) vs NMSAX (1.20). NMSAX was incepted earlier than VSCPX: NMSAX (29 years) vs VSCPX (15 years). NMSAX (0.45) is less costly to investors than VSCPX (0.03). NMSAX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 23.00 vs. VSCPX (13.00). NMSAX has a lower initial minimum investment than VSCPX: NMSAX (2000) vs VSCPX (100000000). VSCPX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 13.65 vs. NMSAX (-5.65). VSCPX return over 5 years is better than : 66.83 vs. NMSAX (16.18).
| NMSAX | VSCPX | NMSAX / VSCPX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.45 | 0.03 | 1,500% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.45 | 0.03 | 1,500% |
| Fund Existence | 29 years | 15 years | - |
| Gain YTD | -0.353 | 6.536 | -5% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 2000 | 100000000 | 0% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 2.68B | 161B | 2% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.20 | 1.33 | 90% |
| Returns for 1 year | -5.65 | 13.65 | -41% |
| Returns for 3 years | 0.35 | 39.36 | 1% |
| Returns for 5 years | 16.18 | 66.83 | 24% |
| Returns for 10 years | 11.64 | 133.00 | 9% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers