Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
NMSAX vs VSCPX
NMSAX vs VSCPX Comparison
Open Charts NMSAX vs VSCPX
Columbia Small Cap Index A
Price$22.25
Change-$0.48 (-2.11%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets2.5B
Vanguard Small Cap Index InstlPlus
Price$346.17
Change-$7.85 (-2.22%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets161.58B
NMSAX vs VSCPX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
NMSAX vs. VSCPX commentary
Nov 14, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is NMSAX is a Hold and VSCPX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
VSCPX has more cash in the bank: 162B vs. NMSAX (2.5B). VSCPX pays higher dividends than NMSAX: VSCPX (1.36) vs NMSAX (1.20). NMSAX was incepted earlier than VSCPX: NMSAX (29 years) vs VSCPX (15 years). NMSAX (0.45) is less costly to investors than VSCPX (0.03). NMSAX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 23.00 vs. VSCPX (13.00). NMSAX has a lower initial minimum investment than VSCPX: NMSAX (2000) vs VSCPX (100000000). VSCPX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 1.46 vs. NMSAX (-14.43). VSCPX return over 5 years is better than : 48.44 vs. NMSAX (4.61).
| NMSAX | VSCPX | NMSAX / VSCPX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.45 | 0.03 | 1,500% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.45 | 0.03 | 1,500% |
| Fund Existence | 29 years | 15 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 0.265 | 6.771 | 4% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 2000 | 100000000 | 0% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 2.5B | 162B | 2% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.20 | 1.36 | 88% |
| Returns for 1 year | -14.43 | 1.46 | -990% |
| Returns for 3 years | -6.29 | 33.28 | -19% |
| Returns for 5 years | 4.61 | 48.44 | 10% |
| Returns for 10 years | 11.92 | 138.39 | 9% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement