Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
NMSAX vs VSCPX
NMSAX vs VSCPX Comparison
Open Charts NMSAX vs VSCPX
Columbia Small Cap Index A
Price$22.55
Change+$0.24 (+1.08%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets2.64B
Vanguard Small Cap Index InstlPlus
Price$352.54
Change+$3.39 (+0.97%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets161.26B
NMSAX vs VSCPX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
NMSAX vs. VSCPX commentary
Sep 28, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is NMSAX is a Buy and VSCPX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
VSCPX has more cash in the bank: 161B vs. NMSAX (2.64B). VSCPX pays higher dividends than NMSAX: VSCPX (1.33) vs NMSAX (1.20). NMSAX was incepted earlier than VSCPX: NMSAX (29 years) vs VSCPX (15 years). NMSAX (0.45) is less costly to investors than VSCPX (0.03). NMSAX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 23.00 vs. VSCPX (13.00). NMSAX has a lower initial minimum investment than VSCPX: NMSAX (2000) vs VSCPX (100000000). VSCPX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 8.04 vs. NMSAX (-8.94). VSCPX return over 5 years is better than : 71.78 vs. NMSAX (23.82).
| NMSAX | VSCPX | NMSAX / VSCPX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.45 | 0.03 | 1,500% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.45 | 0.03 | 1,500% |
| Fund Existence | 29 years | 15 years | - |
| Gain YTD | -0.529 | 6.250 | -8% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 2000 | 100000000 | 0% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 2.64B | 161B | 2% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.20 | 1.33 | 90% |
| Returns for 1 year | -8.94 | 8.04 | -111% |
| Returns for 3 years | 7.70 | 50.86 | 15% |
| Returns for 5 years | 23.82 | 71.78 | 33% |
| Returns for 10 years | 17.06 | 149.06 | 11% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement