Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
NMSAX vs VSCPX
NMSAX vs VSCPX Comparison
Open Charts NMSAX vs VSCPX
Columbia Small Cap Index A
Price$22.39
Change-$0.03 (-0.13%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets2.58B
Vanguard Small Cap Index InstlPlus
Price$350.16
Change-$0.09 (-0.03%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets162.36B
NMSAX vs VSCPX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
NMSAX vs. VSCPX commentary
Oct 19, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is NMSAX is a Hold and VSCPX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
VSCPX has more cash in the bank: 162B vs. NMSAX (2.58B). VSCPX pays higher dividends than NMSAX: VSCPX (1.36) vs NMSAX (1.19). NMSAX was incepted earlier than VSCPX: NMSAX (29 years) vs VSCPX (15 years). NMSAX (0.45) is less costly to investors than VSCPX (0.03). NMSAX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 23.00 vs. VSCPX (13.00). NMSAX has a lower initial minimum investment than VSCPX: NMSAX (2000) vs VSCPX (100000000). VSCPX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 4.95 vs. NMSAX (-11.66). VSCPX return over 5 years is better than : 55.49 vs. NMSAX (11.00).
| NMSAX | VSCPX | NMSAX / VSCPX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.45 | 0.03 | 1,500% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.45 | 0.03 | 1,500% |
| Fund Existence | 29 years | 15 years | - |
| Gain YTD | -1.235 | 5.606 | -22% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 2000 | 100000000 | 0% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 2.58B | 162B | 2% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.19 | 1.36 | 87% |
| Returns for 1 year | -11.66 | 4.95 | -236% |
| Returns for 3 years | 0.33 | 42.04 | 1% |
| Returns for 5 years | 11.00 | 55.49 | 20% |
| Returns for 10 years | 8.30 | 130.96 | 6% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement