Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
NMSAX vs VSCIX
NMSAX vs VSCIX Comparison
Open Charts NMSAX vs VSCIX
Columbia Small Cap Index A
Price$22.59
Change+$0.07 (+0.31%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets2.68B
Vanguard Small Cap Index I
Price$122.47
Change+$0.86 (+0.71%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets161.26B
NMSAX vs VSCIX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
NMSAX vs. VSCIX commentary
Sep 08, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is NMSAX is a Buy and VSCIX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
VSCIX has more cash in the bank: 161B vs. NMSAX (2.68B). VSCIX pays higher dividends than NMSAX: VSCIX (1.32) vs NMSAX (1.20). NMSAX was incepted earlier than VSCIX: NMSAX (29 years) vs VSCIX (28 years). NMSAX (0.45) is less costly to investors than VSCIX (0.04). NMSAX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 23.00 vs. VSCIX (13.00). NMSAX has a lower initial minimum investment than VSCIX: NMSAX (2000) vs VSCIX (5000000). VSCIX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 13.65 vs. NMSAX (-5.65). VSCIX return over 5 years is better than : 66.81 vs. NMSAX (16.18).
| NMSAX | VSCIX | NMSAX / VSCIX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.45 | 0.04 | 1,125% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.45 | 0.04 | 1,125% |
| Fund Existence | 29 years | 28 years | - |
| Gain YTD | -0.353 | 6.537 | -5% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 2000 | 5000000 | 0% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 2.68B | 161B | 2% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.20 | 1.32 | 91% |
| Returns for 1 year | -5.65 | 13.65 | -41% |
| Returns for 3 years | 0.35 | 39.36 | 1% |
| Returns for 5 years | 16.18 | 66.81 | 24% |
| Returns for 10 years | 11.64 | 132.96 | 9% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement