Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
NMSAX vs VSCIX
NMSAX vs VSCIX Comparison
Open Charts NMSAX vs VSCIX
Columbia Small Cap Index A
Price$23.21
Change+$0.33 (+1.44%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets2.56B
Vanguard Small Cap Index I
Price$124.07
Change+$1.27 (+1.03%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets161.58B
NMSAX vs VSCIX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
NMSAX vs. VSCIX commentary
Dec 04, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is NMSAX is a Buy and VSCIX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
VSCIX has more cash in the bank: 162B vs. NMSAX (2.56B). VSCIX pays higher dividends than NMSAX: VSCIX (1.33) vs NMSAX (1.17). NMSAX was incepted earlier than VSCIX: NMSAX (29 years) vs VSCIX (28 years). NMSAX (0.45) is less costly to investors than VSCIX (0.04). NMSAX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 23.00 vs. VSCIX (13.00). NMSAX has a lower initial minimum investment than VSCIX: NMSAX (2000) vs VSCIX (5000000). VSCIX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : -0.84 vs. NMSAX (-15.66). VSCIX return over 5 years is better than : 41.15 vs. NMSAX (-1.26).
| NMSAX | VSCIX | NMSAX / VSCIX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.45 | 0.04 | 1,125% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.45 | 0.04 | 1,125% |
| Fund Existence | 29 years | 28 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 0.838 | 7.134 | 12% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 2000 | 5000000 | 0% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 2.56B | 162B | 2% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.17 | 1.33 | 88% |
| Returns for 1 year | -15.66 | -0.84 | 1,866% |
| Returns for 3 years | -6.83 | 32.18 | -21% |
| Returns for 5 years | -1.26 | 41.15 | -3% |
| Returns for 10 years | 16.62 | 132.08 | 13% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers