NMRA
Price
$2.35
Change
+$0.06 (+2.62%)
Updated
Jul 25 closing price
Capitalization
380.11M
10 days until earnings call
RCUS
Price
$10.23
Change
+$0.36 (+3.65%)
Updated
Jul 25 closing price
Capitalization
1.08B
4 days until earnings call
Interact to see
Advertisement

NMRA vs RCUS

Header iconNMRA vs RCUS Comparison
Open Charts NMRA vs RCUSBanner chart's image
Neumora Therapeutics
Price$2.35
Change+$0.06 (+2.62%)
Volume$4.27M
Capitalization380.11M
Arcus Biosciences
Price$10.23
Change+$0.36 (+3.65%)
Volume$713.7K
Capitalization1.08B
NMRA vs RCUS Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
NMRA
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
RCUS
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
NMRA vs. RCUS commentary
Jul 27, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is NMRA is a Buy and RCUS is a Buy.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Jul 27, 2025
Stock price -- (NMRA: $2.35 vs. RCUS: $10.23)
Brand notoriety: NMRA and RCUS are both not notable
Both companies represent the Biotechnology industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: NMRA: 264% vs. RCUS: 72%
Market capitalization -- NMRA: $380.11M vs. RCUS: $1.08B
NMRA [@Biotechnology] is valued at $380.11M. RCUS’s [@Biotechnology] market capitalization is $1.08B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Biotechnology] industry ranges from $313.33B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Biotechnology] industry is $2.57B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

NMRA’s FA Score shows that 1 FA rating(s) are green whileRCUS’s FA Score has 0 green FA rating(s).

  • NMRA’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
  • RCUS’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
According to our system of comparison, NMRA is a better buy in the long-term than RCUS.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

NMRA’s TA Score shows that 5 TA indicator(s) are bullish while RCUS’s TA Score has 5 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • NMRA’s TA Score: 5 bullish, 4 bearish.
  • RCUS’s TA Score: 5 bullish, 4 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, both NMRA and RCUS are a good buy in the short-term.

Price Growth

NMRA (@Biotechnology) experienced а +27.03% price change this week, while RCUS (@Biotechnology) price change was +11.80% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Biotechnology industry was +7.60%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +17.32%, and the average quarterly price growth was +27.29%.

Reported Earning Dates

NMRA is expected to report earnings on Aug 06, 2025.

RCUS is expected to report earnings on Jul 31, 2025.

Industries' Descriptions

@Biotechnology (+7.60% weekly)

Biotechnology involves genetic or protein engineering to produce medicines/therapies for treating and preventing ailments. The industry also provides crucial ingredients for diagnostics. This multi-billion-dollar industry is heavily focused on research and development, as companies attempt to continually come up with cutting-edge solutions for health. New discoveries for the treatment of diseases provide opportunities for growth for a company in this industry. Discoveries, however, must pass the regulatory approval from the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA) before they can make it to markets. Amgen Inc., Gilead Sciences, Inc. and Celgene Corporation are examples of companies in this industry.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RCUS($1.08B) has a higher market cap than NMRA($380M). RCUS YTD gains are higher at: -31.296 vs. NMRA (-77.830). NMRA has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): -273.7M vs. RCUS (-377M). RCUS has more cash in the bank: 997M vs. NMRA (249M). NMRA has less debt than RCUS: NMRA (938K) vs RCUS (60M). RCUS has higher revenues than NMRA: RCUS (141M) vs NMRA (0).
NMRARCUSNMRA / RCUS
Capitalization380M1.08B35%
EBITDA-273.7M-377M73%
Gain YTD-77.830-31.296249%
P/E RatioN/AN/A-
Revenue0141M-
Total Cash249M997M25%
Total Debt938K60M2%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
RCUS: Fundamental Ratings
RCUS
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
17
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
52
Fair valued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
100
SMR RATING
1..100
97
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
52
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
98
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
n/a

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
NMRARCUS
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
90%
N/A
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
85%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
85%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
88%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
74%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
90%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
73%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
87%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
77%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
88%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
77%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
87%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
80%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 5 days ago
85%
Bearish Trend 21 days ago
82%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
90%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
90%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 6 days ago
90%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
81%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
NMRA
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
RCUS
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
STOCK / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
GEODF2.790.12
+4.51%
Geodrill Ltd.
HNHPF11.780.09
+0.77%
Hon Hai Precision Industry Co. Ltd.
ERVFF0.03N/A
N/A
Boron One Holdings Inc.
AITUY11.86N/A
N/A
Anritsu Corp.
KLPEF38.90-0.15
-0.38%
Klepierre SA

NMRA and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, NMRA has been loosely correlated with NGNE. These tickers have moved in lockstep 38% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if NMRA jumps, then NGNE could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To NMRA
1D Price
Change %
NMRA100%
+2.62%
NGNE - NMRA
38%
Loosely correlated
-0.39%
ABOS - NMRA
37%
Loosely correlated
N/A
AURA - NMRA
36%
Loosely correlated
+2.41%
SNDX - NMRA
35%
Loosely correlated
-3.60%
RCUS - NMRA
34%
Loosely correlated
+3.65%
More

RCUS and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, RCUS has been loosely correlated with XNCR. These tickers have moved in lockstep 51% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if RCUS jumps, then XNCR could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To RCUS
1D Price
Change %
RCUS100%
+3.65%
XNCR - RCUS
51%
Loosely correlated
N/A
IDYA - RCUS
49%
Loosely correlated
-1.33%
OCUL - RCUS
48%
Loosely correlated
+2.43%
TRDA - RCUS
48%
Loosely correlated
+2.35%
ACLX - RCUS
47%
Loosely correlated
+1.48%
More