NMR
Price
$7.20
Change
+$0.04 (+0.56%)
Updated
Sep 5, 04:59 PM (EDT)
Capitalization
21.09B
53 days until earnings call
SF
Price
$112.57
Change
-$3.14 (-2.71%)
Updated
Sep 5, 04:59 PM (EDT)
Capitalization
11.5B
46 days until earnings call
Interact to see
Advertisement

NMR vs SF

Header iconNMR vs SF Comparison
Open Charts NMR vs SFBanner chart's image
Nomura Holdings
Price$7.20
Change+$0.04 (+0.56%)
Volume$5.49K
Capitalization21.09B
Stifel Financial
Price$112.57
Change-$3.14 (-2.71%)
Volume$6.07K
Capitalization11.5B
NMR vs SF Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
NMR
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
SF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
NMR vs. SF commentary
Sep 06, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is NMR is a StrongBuy and SF is a Buy.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Sep 06, 2025
Stock price -- (NMR: $7.20 vs. SF: $112.58)
Brand notoriety: NMR and SF are both not notable
Both companies represent the Investment Banks/Brokers industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: NMR: 62% vs. SF: 102%
Market capitalization -- NMR: $21.09B vs. SF: $11.5B
NMR [@Investment Banks/Brokers] is valued at $21.09B. SF’s [@Investment Banks/Brokers] market capitalization is $11.5B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Investment Banks/Brokers] industry ranges from $928.5B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Investment Banks/Brokers] industry is $10.1B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

NMR’s FA Score shows that 2 FA rating(s) are green whileSF’s FA Score has 4 green FA rating(s).

  • NMR’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
  • SF’s FA Score: 4 green, 1 red.
According to our system of comparison, SF is a better buy in the long-term than NMR.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

NMR’s TA Score shows that 4 TA indicator(s) are bullish while SF’s TA Score has 3 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • NMR’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 4 bearish.
  • SF’s TA Score: 3 bullish, 4 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, NMR is a better buy in the short-term than SF.

Price Growth

NMR (@Investment Banks/Brokers) experienced а +0.14% price change this week, while SF (@Investment Banks/Brokers) price change was -1.96% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Investment Banks/Brokers industry was +0.73%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +0.48%, and the average quarterly price growth was +41.22%.

Reported Earning Dates

NMR is expected to report earnings on Oct 29, 2025.

SF is expected to report earnings on Oct 22, 2025.

Industries' Descriptions

@Investment Banks/Brokers (+0.73% weekly)

These banks specialize in underwriting (helping companies with debt financing or equity issuances), IPOs, facilitating mergers and other corporate reorganizations and acting as a broker or financial advisor for institutions. They might also trade securities on their own accounts. Investment banks potentially thrive on expanding its network of clients, since that could help them increase profits. Goldman Sachs, Morgan Stanley and CME Group Inc are some of the largest investment banking companies.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
NMR($21.1B) has a higher market cap than SF($11.5B). SF has higher P/E ratio than NMR: SF (21.82) vs NMR (8.68). NMR YTD gains are higher at: 23.661 vs. SF (10.531). SF has less debt than NMR: SF (1.55B) vs NMR (15.59T).
NMRSFNMR / SF
Capitalization21.1B11.5B183%
EBITDAN/AN/A-
Gain YTD23.66110.531225%
P/E Ratio8.6821.8240%
Revenue1.73TN/A-
Total CashN/AN/A-
Total Debt15.59T1.55B1,003,346%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
NMR vs SF: Fundamental Ratings
NMR
SF
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
6659
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
14
Undervalued
33
Fair valued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
5220
SMR RATING
1..100
112
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
4845
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
8528
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
8550

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

NMR's Valuation (14) in the Investment Banks Or Brokers industry is in the same range as SF (33). This means that NMR’s stock grew similarly to SF’s over the last 12 months.

SF's Profit vs Risk Rating (20) in the Investment Banks Or Brokers industry is in the same range as NMR (52). This means that SF’s stock grew similarly to NMR’s over the last 12 months.

NMR's SMR Rating (1) in the Investment Banks Or Brokers industry is in the same range as SF (12). This means that NMR’s stock grew similarly to SF’s over the last 12 months.

SF's Price Growth Rating (45) in the Investment Banks Or Brokers industry is in the same range as NMR (48). This means that SF’s stock grew similarly to NMR’s over the last 12 months.

SF's P/E Growth Rating (28) in the Investment Banks Or Brokers industry is somewhat better than the same rating for NMR (85). This means that SF’s stock grew somewhat faster than NMR’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
NMRSF
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
55%
N/A
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
56%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
60%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
55%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
71%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
53%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
59%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
56%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
60%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
64%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
67%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 19 days ago
64%
Bullish Trend 9 days ago
68%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
57%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
62%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
59%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
36%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
61%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
61%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
NMR
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
SF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
ETFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
TEQI43.800.23
+0.52%
T. Rowe Price Equity Income ETF
XIJN30.910.03
+0.11%
FT Vest U.S. Eq Bffr & Prm Inc ETF -June
FDTS54.56N/A
N/A
First Trust DevMkts exUS SC AlphaDEX®ETF
FXU43.90-0.02
-0.05%
First Trust Utilities AlphaDEX® ETF
SRTY12.85-0.48
-3.60%
ProShares UltraPro Short Russell2000

NMR and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, NMR has been loosely correlated with SF. These tickers have moved in lockstep 56% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if NMR jumps, then SF could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To NMR
1D Price
Change %
NMR100%
+1.27%
SF - NMR
56%
Loosely correlated
+1.97%
EVR - NMR
56%
Loosely correlated
+1.67%
JEF - NMR
55%
Loosely correlated
+1.80%
LAZ - NMR
53%
Loosely correlated
+3.33%
PIPR - NMR
53%
Loosely correlated
+2.84%
More

SF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, SF has been closely correlated with EVR. These tickers have moved in lockstep 88% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if SF jumps, then EVR could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To SF
1D Price
Change %
SF100%
+1.97%
EVR - SF
88%
Closely correlated
+1.67%
GS - SF
88%
Closely correlated
+2.51%
RJF - SF
87%
Closely correlated
+2.72%
MS - SF
86%
Closely correlated
+1.35%
JEF - SF
85%
Closely correlated
+1.80%
More