NMR
Price
$6.24
Change
+$0.09 (+1.46%)
Updated
Jun 6 closing price
Capitalization
18.15B
52 days until earnings call
SF
Price
$96.53
Change
+$1.71 (+1.80%)
Updated
Jun 6 closing price
Capitalization
7.95B
45 days until earnings call
Interact to see
Advertisement

NMR vs SF

Header iconNMR vs SF Comparison
Open Charts NMR vs SFBanner chart's image
Nomura Holdings
Price$6.24
Change+$0.09 (+1.46%)
Volume$369.72K
Capitalization18.15B
Stifel Financial
Price$96.53
Change+$1.71 (+1.80%)
Volume$504.56K
Capitalization7.95B
NMR vs SF Comparison Chart
Loading...
NMR
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
SF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
NMR vs. SF commentary
Jun 08, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is NMR is a Buy and SF is a StrongBuy.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Jun 08, 2025
Stock price -- (NMR: $6.05 vs. SF: $94.54)
Brand notoriety: NMR and SF are both not notable
Both companies represent the Investment Banks/Brokers industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: NMR: 49% vs. SF: 47%
Market capitalization -- NMR: $18.15B vs. SF: $7.95B
NMR [@Investment Banks/Brokers] is valued at $18.15B. SF’s [@Investment Banks/Brokers] market capitalization is $7.95B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Investment Banks/Brokers] industry ranges from $928.5B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Investment Banks/Brokers] industry is $12.03B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

NMR’s FA Score shows that 1 FA rating(s) are green whileSF’s FA Score has 2 green FA rating(s).

  • NMR’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
  • SF’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
According to our system of comparison, both NMR and SF are a good buy in the long-term.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

NMR’s TA Score shows that 5 TA indicator(s) are bullish while SF’s TA Score has 4 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • NMR’s TA Score: 5 bullish, 5 bearish.
  • SF’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 6 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, NMR is a better buy in the short-term than SF.

Price Growth

NMR (@Investment Banks/Brokers) experienced а +1.51% price change this week, while SF (@Investment Banks/Brokers) price change was +0.04% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Investment Banks/Brokers industry was +1.82%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +8.70%, and the average quarterly price growth was +90.47%.

Reported Earning Dates

NMR is expected to report earnings on Jul 30, 2025.

SF is expected to report earnings on Jul 23, 2025.

Industries' Descriptions

@Investment Banks/Brokers (+1.82% weekly)

These banks specialize in underwriting (helping companies with debt financing or equity issuances), IPOs, facilitating mergers and other corporate reorganizations and acting as a broker or financial advisor for institutions. They might also trade securities on their own accounts. Investment banks potentially thrive on expanding its network of clients, since that could help them increase profits. Goldman Sachs, Morgan Stanley and CME Group Inc are some of the largest investment banking companies.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
NMR($18.1B) has a higher market cap than SF($7.95B). NMR has higher P/E ratio than SF: NMR (25.08) vs SF (18.06). NMR YTD gains are higher at: 4.491 vs. SF (-10.491). SF has less debt than NMR: SF (1.18B) vs NMR (13.16T). NMR has higher revenues than SF: NMR (1.27T) vs SF (4.29B).
NMRSFNMR / SF
Capitalization18.1B7.95B228%
EBITDAN/AN/A-
Gain YTD4.491-10.491-43%
P/E Ratio25.0818.06139%
Revenue1.27T4.29B29,527%
Total CashN/AN/A-
Total Debt13.16T1.18B1,118,793%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
NMR vs SF: Fundamental Ratings
NMR
SF
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
873
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
40
Fair valued
86
Overvalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
5223
SMR RATING
1..100
111
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
5252
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
9654
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
50n/a

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

NMR's Valuation (40) in the Investment Banks Or Brokers industry is somewhat better than the same rating for SF (86). This means that NMR’s stock grew somewhat faster than SF’s over the last 12 months.

SF's Profit vs Risk Rating (23) in the Investment Banks Or Brokers industry is in the same range as NMR (52). This means that SF’s stock grew similarly to NMR’s over the last 12 months.

NMR's SMR Rating (1) in the Investment Banks Or Brokers industry is in the same range as SF (11). This means that NMR’s stock grew similarly to SF’s over the last 12 months.

NMR's Price Growth Rating (52) in the Investment Banks Or Brokers industry is in the same range as SF (52). This means that NMR’s stock grew similarly to SF’s over the last 12 months.

SF's P/E Growth Rating (54) in the Investment Banks Or Brokers industry is somewhat better than the same rating for NMR (96). This means that SF’s stock grew somewhat faster than NMR’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
NMRSF
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 11 days ago
52%
Bearish Trend 11 days ago
57%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 11 days ago
58%
Bearish Trend 11 days ago
64%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 11 days ago
65%
Bearish Trend 11 days ago
68%
MACD
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bearish Trend 11 days ago
60%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 11 days ago
59%
Bearish Trend 11 days ago
62%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 11 days ago
59%
Bullish Trend 11 days ago
68%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 25 days ago
62%
Bullish Trend 26 days ago
67%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend about 1 month ago
56%
Bearish Trend 17 days ago
64%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 11 days ago
57%
Bearish Trend 11 days ago
46%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 11 days ago
57%
Bullish Trend 11 days ago
59%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
NMR
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
SF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
STOCK / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
AAPL200.420.21
+0.10%
Apple
SPY587.73-3.42
-0.58%
SPDR® S&P 500® ETF
BTC.X107802.330000-1192.312500
-1.09%
Bitcoin cryptocurrency
TSLA356.90-5.99
-1.65%
Tesla
GME31.21-3.80
-10.85%
GameStop Corp

NMR and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, NMR has been loosely correlated with SF. These tickers have moved in lockstep 52% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if NMR jumps, then SF could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To NMR
1D Price
Change %
NMR100%
-2.10%
SF - NMR
52%
Loosely correlated
-1.12%
EVR - NMR
52%
Loosely correlated
-0.90%
JEF - NMR
51%
Loosely correlated
-1.33%
PIPR - NMR
50%
Loosely correlated
-1.99%
MC - NMR
49%
Loosely correlated
-2.14%
More

SF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, SF has been closely correlated with GS. These tickers have moved in lockstep 87% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if SF jumps, then GS could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To SF
1D Price
Change %
SF100%
-1.12%
GS - SF
87%
Closely correlated
-1.18%
EVR - SF
87%
Closely correlated
-0.90%
PIPR - SF
85%
Closely correlated
-1.99%
MS - SF
85%
Closely correlated
-1.32%
RJF - SF
84%
Closely correlated
-1.21%
More