NMR
Price
$5.03
Change
-$0.14 (-2.71%)
Updated
Apr 7, 04:55 PM (EDT)
Capitalization
18.15B
18 days until earnings call
PIPR
Price
$213.06
Change
-$3.95 (-1.82%)
Updated
Apr 7, 04:58 PM (EDT)
Capitalization
2.98B
18 days until earnings call
Ad is loading...

NMR vs PIPR

Header iconNMR vs PIPR Comparison
Open Charts NMR vs PIPRBanner chart's image
Nomura Holdings
Price$5.03
Change-$0.14 (-2.71%)
Volume$2.6K
Capitalization18.15B
Piper Sandler Companies
Price$213.06
Change-$3.95 (-1.82%)
Volume$400
Capitalization2.98B
NMR vs PIPR Comparison Chart
Loading...
NMR
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
PIPR
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
NMR vs. PIPR commentary
Apr 07, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is NMR is a Hold and PIPR is a Hold.

Ad is loading...
COMPARISON
Comparison
Apr 07, 2025
Stock price -- (NMR: $5.17 vs. PIPR: $217.00)
Brand notoriety: NMR and PIPR are both not notable
Both companies represent the Investment Banks/Brokers industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: NMR: 264% vs. PIPR: 241%
Market capitalization -- NMR: $18.15B vs. PIPR: $2.98B
NMR [@Investment Banks/Brokers] is valued at $18.15B. PIPR’s [@Investment Banks/Brokers] market capitalization is $2.98B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Investment Banks/Brokers] industry ranges from $928.5B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Investment Banks/Brokers] industry is $11.87B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

NMR’s FA Score shows that 2 FA rating(s) are green whilePIPR’s FA Score has 1 green FA rating(s).

  • NMR’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
  • PIPR’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
According to our system of comparison, NMR is a better buy in the long-term than PIPR.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

NMR’s TA Score shows that 3 TA indicator(s) are bullish while PIPR’s TA Score has 4 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • NMR’s TA Score: 3 bullish, 6 bearish.
  • PIPR’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 4 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, PIPR is a better buy in the short-term than NMR.

Price Growth

NMR (@Investment Banks/Brokers) experienced а -19.09% price change this week, while PIPR (@Investment Banks/Brokers) price change was -12.32% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Investment Banks/Brokers industry was -5.35%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was -8.90%, and the average quarterly price growth was +138.12%.

Reported Earning Dates

NMR is expected to report earnings on Apr 25, 2025.

PIPR is expected to report earnings on Apr 25, 2025.

Industries' Descriptions

@Investment Banks/Brokers (-5.35% weekly)

These banks specialize in underwriting (helping companies with debt financing or equity issuances), IPOs, facilitating mergers and other corporate reorganizations and acting as a broker or financial advisor for institutions. They might also trade securities on their own accounts. Investment banks potentially thrive on expanding its network of clients, since that could help them increase profits. Goldman Sachs, Morgan Stanley and CME Group Inc are some of the largest investment banking companies.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
NMR($18.1B) has a higher market cap than PIPR($2.98B). PIPR has higher P/E ratio than NMR: PIPR (39.76) vs NMR (25.08). NMR YTD gains are higher at: -10.708 vs. PIPR (-26.710). PIPR has less debt than NMR: PIPR (164M) vs NMR (13.16T). NMR has higher revenues than PIPR: NMR (1.27T) vs PIPR (1.3B).
NMRPIPRNMR / PIPR
Capitalization18.1B2.98B608%
EBITDAN/AN/A-
Gain YTD-10.708-26.71040%
P/E Ratio25.0839.7663%
Revenue1.27T1.3B97,462%
Total CashN/AN/A-
Total Debt13.16T164M8,022,561%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
NMR vs PIPR: Fundamental Ratings
NMR
PIPR
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
7316
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
31
Undervalued
36
Fair valued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
5015
SMR RATING
1..100
143
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
5061
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
9787
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
n/a50

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

NMR's Valuation (31) in the Investment Banks Or Brokers industry is in the same range as PIPR (36) in the null industry. This means that NMR’s stock grew similarly to PIPR’s over the last 12 months.

PIPR's Profit vs Risk Rating (15) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for NMR (50) in the Investment Banks Or Brokers industry. This means that PIPR’s stock grew somewhat faster than NMR’s over the last 12 months.

NMR's SMR Rating (1) in the Investment Banks Or Brokers industry is somewhat better than the same rating for PIPR (43) in the null industry. This means that NMR’s stock grew somewhat faster than PIPR’s over the last 12 months.

NMR's Price Growth Rating (50) in the Investment Banks Or Brokers industry is in the same range as PIPR (61) in the null industry. This means that NMR’s stock grew similarly to PIPR’s over the last 12 months.

PIPR's P/E Growth Rating (87) in the null industry is in the same range as NMR (97) in the Investment Banks Or Brokers industry. This means that PIPR’s stock grew similarly to NMR’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
NMRPIPR
RSI
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bullish Trend 7 days ago
68%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 7 days ago
59%
Bullish Trend 7 days ago
79%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 7 days ago
61%
Bearish Trend 7 days ago
59%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 7 days ago
59%
Bullish Trend 7 days ago
75%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 7 days ago
56%
Bearish Trend 7 days ago
63%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 7 days ago
60%
Bearish Trend 7 days ago
58%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 14 days ago
63%
Bullish Trend 7 days ago
74%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 7 days ago
55%
Bearish Trend 11 days ago
63%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 7 days ago
62%
Bearish Trend 7 days ago
73%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 7 days ago
59%
Bearish Trend 7 days ago
50%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Ad is loading...
NMR
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
PIPR
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
STOCK / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
GME23.492.39
+11.33%
GameStop Corp
SPY505.28-31.42
-5.85%
SPDR® S&P 500® ETF Trust
BTC.X78214.484000-5290.312500
-6.34%
Bitcoin cryptocurrency
AAPL188.38-14.81
-7.29%
Apple
TSLA239.43-27.85
-10.42%
Tesla

NMR and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, NMR has been loosely correlated with SNEX. These tickers have moved in lockstep 35% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if NMR jumps, then SNEX could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To NMR
1D Price
Change %
NMR100%
-8.17%
SNEX - NMR
35%
Loosely correlated
-6.24%
HOOD - NMR
34%
Loosely correlated
-9.80%
EVR - NMR
32%
Poorly correlated
-7.69%
PIPR - NMR
32%
Poorly correlated
-5.67%
COIN - NMR
30%
Poorly correlated
-5.98%
More

PIPR and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, PIPR has been closely correlated with EVR. These tickers have moved in lockstep 87% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if PIPR jumps, then EVR could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To PIPR
1D Price
Change %
PIPR100%
-5.67%
EVR - PIPR
87%
Closely correlated
-7.69%
MC - PIPR
84%
Closely correlated
-4.50%
SF - PIPR
80%
Closely correlated
-8.00%
PJT - PIPR
79%
Closely correlated
-4.25%
GS - PIPR
79%
Closely correlated
-7.91%
More