Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
NMPAX vs VIMSX
NMPAX vs VIMSX Comparison
Open Charts NMPAX vs VIMSX
Columbia Mid Cap Index Inst
Price$15.01
Change+$0.08 (+0.54%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets2.59B
Vanguard Mid Cap Index Investor
Price$79.00
Change-$0.11 (-0.14%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets199.16B
NMPAX vs VIMSX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
NMPAX vs. VIMSX commentary
Sep 08, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is NMPAX is a Buy and VIMSX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
VIMSX has more cash in the bank: 199B vs. NMPAX (2.59B). VIMSX pays higher dividends than NMPAX: VIMSX (1.35) vs NMPAX (1.27). NMPAX was incepted earlier than VIMSX: NMPAX (25 years) vs VIMSX (27 years). NMPAX (0.33) is less costly to investors than VIMSX (0.17). NMPAX (16.00) and VIMSX (16.00) have comparable annual turnover. NMPAX has a lower initial minimum investment than VIMSX: NMPAX (2000) vs VIMSX (3000). VIMSX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 15.02 vs. NMPAX (2.43). VIMSX return over 5 years is better than : 64.92 vs. NMPAX (12.21).
| NMPAX | VIMSX | NMPAX / VIMSX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.20 | 0.17 | 118% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.33 | 0.17 | 194% |
| Fund Existence | 25 years | 27 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 3.683 | 9.679 | 38% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 2000 | 3000 | 67% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 2.59B | 199B | 1% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.27 | 1.35 | 94% |
| Returns for 1 year | 2.43 | 15.02 | 16% |
| Returns for 3 years | 14.65 | 41.01 | 36% |
| Returns for 5 years | 12.21 | 64.92 | 19% |
| Returns for 10 years | 8.70 | 140.93 | 6% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers