Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
NMPAX vs VIMSX
NMPAX vs VIMSX Comparison
Open Charts NMPAX vs VIMSX
Columbia Mid Cap Index Inst
Price$14.63
Change+$0.13 (+0.90%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets2.57B
Vanguard Mid Cap Index Investor
Price$79.10
Change+$0.60 (+0.76%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets192.45B
NMPAX vs VIMSX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
NMPAX vs. VIMSX commentary
Jul 27, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is NMPAX is a Buy and VIMSX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
VIMSX has more cash in the bank: 192B vs. NMPAX (2.57B). VIMSX pays higher dividends than NMPAX: VIMSX (1.40) vs NMPAX (1.33). NMPAX was incepted earlier than VIMSX: NMPAX (25 years) vs VIMSX (27 years). NMPAX (0.33) is less costly to investors than VIMSX (0.17). NMPAX (16.00) and VIMSX (16.00) have comparable annual turnover. NMPAX has a lower initial minimum investment than VIMSX: NMPAX (2000) vs VIMSX (3000). VIMSX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 17.91 vs. NMPAX (-1.49). VIMSX return over 5 years is better than : 70.78 vs. NMPAX (12.39).
| NMPAX | VIMSX | NMPAX / VIMSX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.20 | 0.17 | 118% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.33 | 0.17 | 194% |
| Fund Existence | 25 years | 27 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 1.058 | 9.818 | 11% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 2000 | 3000 | 67% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 2.57B | 192B | 1% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.33 | 1.40 | 95% |
| Returns for 1 year | -1.49 | 17.91 | -8% |
| Returns for 3 years | 11.10 | 42.07 | 26% |
| Returns for 5 years | 12.39 | 70.78 | 18% |
| Returns for 10 years | 1.87 | 132.48 | 1% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement