Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
NMIAX vs VTSAX
NMIAX vs VTSAX Comparison
Open Charts NMIAX vs VTSAX
Columbia Large Cap Enhanced Core A
Price$28.94
Change+$0.14 (+0.49%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets500.07M
Vanguard Total Stock Mkt Idx Adm
Price$152.65
Change+$0.67 (+0.44%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets1.91T
NMIAX vs VTSAX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
NMIAX vs. VTSAX commentary
Jul 28, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is NMIAX is a Buy and VTSAX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
VTSAX has more cash in the bank: 1.91T vs. NMIAX (500M). VTSAX pays higher dividends than NMIAX: VTSAX (1.21) vs NMIAX (0.73). NMIAX was incepted earlier than VTSAX: NMIAX (29 years) vs VTSAX (25 years). NMIAX (1.21) is less costly to investors than VTSAX (0.04). NMIAX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 85.00 vs. VTSAX (2.00). NMIAX has a lower initial minimum investment than VTSAX: NMIAX (2000) vs VTSAX (3000). VTSAX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 17.75 vs. NMIAX (6.41). VTSAX return over 5 years is better than : 93.55 vs. NMIAX (27.59).
| NMIAX | VTSAX | NMIAX / VTSAX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.83 | 0.04 | 2,075% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.21 | 0.04 | 3,025% |
| Fund Existence | 29 years | 25 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 4.631 | 8.289 | 56% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 2000 | 3000 | 67% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 500M | 1.91T | 0% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.73 | 1.21 | 61% |
| Returns for 1 year | 6.41 | 17.75 | 36% |
| Returns for 3 years | 36.02 | 60.63 | 59% |
| Returns for 5 years | 27.59 | 93.55 | 29% |
| Returns for 10 years | 41.78 | 201.64 | 21% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement