NMGX
Price
$0.56
Change
-$0.02 (-3.45%)
Updated
Jul 2 closing price
Capitalization
11.05M
NPCPF
Price
$7.63
Change
+$1.36 (+21.69%)
Updated
May 15 closing price
Capitalization
21.72B
Interact to see
Advertisement

NMGX vs NPCPF

Header iconNMGX vs NPCPF Comparison
Open Charts NMGX vs NPCPFBanner chart's image
NANO MAGIC
Price$0.56
Change-$0.02 (-3.45%)
Volume$951
Capitalization11.05M
Nippon Paint Holdings
Price$7.63
Change+$1.36 (+21.69%)
Volume$495
Capitalization21.72B
NMGX vs NPCPF Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
NMGX
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
NPCPF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
NMGX vs. NPCPF commentary
Jul 08, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is NMGX is a Hold and NPCPF is a Hold.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Jul 08, 2025
Stock price -- (NMGX: $0.56 vs. NPCPF: $7.63)
Brand notoriety: NMGX and NPCPF are both not notable
Both companies represent the Chemicals: Specialty industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: NMGX: 172% vs. NPCPF: 126%
Market capitalization -- NMGX: $11.05M vs. NPCPF: $21.72B
NMGX [@Chemicals: Specialty] is valued at $11.05M. NPCPF’s [@Chemicals: Specialty] market capitalization is $21.72B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Chemicals: Specialty] industry ranges from $223.16B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Chemicals: Specialty] industry is $9.36B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

NMGX’s FA Score shows that 0 FA rating(s) are green whileNPCPF’s FA Score has 0 green FA rating(s).

  • NMGX’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
  • NPCPF’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
According to our system of comparison, NPCPF is a better buy in the long-term than NMGX.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

NMGX’s TA Score shows that 3 TA indicator(s) are bullish while NPCPF’s TA Score has 2 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • NMGX’s TA Score: 3 bullish, 3 bearish.
  • NPCPF’s TA Score: 2 bullish, 1 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, NPCPF is a better buy in the short-term than NMGX.

Price Growth

NMGX (@Chemicals: Specialty) experienced а -7.00% price change this week, while NPCPF (@Chemicals: Specialty) price change was 0.00% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Chemicals: Specialty industry was +2.17%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +4.07%, and the average quarterly price growth was +4.29%.

Industries' Descriptions

@Chemicals: Specialty (+2.17% weekly)

The specialty chemicals sector includes companies that produce chemicals and industrial gases, which are of relatively high-value, often made to customer specifications. Examples of specialty chemicals are electronic chemicals, industrial gases, coatings, adhesives and sealants, industrial and institutional cleaning chemicals. The products are often valued on the basis of their purposes/performances rather than for their composition. Linde Plc, Ecolab Inc., Air Products and Chemicals, Inc., and Dow, Inc. are some of the largest companies making specialty chemicals.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
NPCPF($21.7B) has a higher market cap than NMGX($11M). NMGX YTD gains are higher at: 24.000 vs. NPCPF (21.630). NPCPF has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): 177B vs. NMGX (-2.67M). NPCPF has more cash in the bank: 236B vs. NMGX (55.8K). NMGX has less debt than NPCPF: NMGX (1.26M) vs NPCPF (722B). NPCPF has higher revenues than NMGX: NPCPF (1.35T) vs NMGX (2.76M).
NMGXNPCPFNMGX / NPCPF
Capitalization11M21.7B0%
EBITDA-2.67M177B-0%
Gain YTD24.00021.630111%
P/E RatioN/A31.35-
Revenue2.76M1.35T0%
Total Cash55.8K236B0%
Total Debt1.26M722B0%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
NMGX vs NPCPF: Fundamental Ratings
NMGX
NPCPF
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
5050
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
92
Overvalued
59
Fair valued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
100100
SMR RATING
1..100
10073
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
6349
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
10050
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
n/an/a

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

NPCPF's Valuation (59) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for NMGX (92). This means that NPCPF’s stock grew somewhat faster than NMGX’s over the last 12 months.

NPCPF's Profit vs Risk Rating (100) in the null industry is in the same range as NMGX (100). This means that NPCPF’s stock grew similarly to NMGX’s over the last 12 months.

NPCPF's SMR Rating (73) in the null industry is in the same range as NMGX (100). This means that NPCPF’s stock grew similarly to NMGX’s over the last 12 months.

NPCPF's Price Growth Rating (49) in the null industry is in the same range as NMGX (63). This means that NPCPF’s stock grew similarly to NMGX’s over the last 12 months.

NPCPF's P/E Growth Rating (50) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for NMGX (100). This means that NPCPF’s stock grew somewhat faster than NMGX’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
NMGXNPCPF
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 5 days ago
50%
N/A
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 5 days ago
85%
Bullish Trend 5 days ago
22%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 5 days ago
85%
N/A
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 5 days ago
60%
Bearish Trend 5 days ago
30%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 5 days ago
81%
Bullish Trend 5 days ago
18%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 5 days ago
60%
Bullish Trend 5 days ago
17%
Advances
ODDS (%)
N/A
N/A
Declines
ODDS (%)
N/A
N/A
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 5 days ago
50%
N/A
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 5 days ago
58%
Bullish Trend 5 days ago
29%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
NMGX
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
NPCPF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
STOCK / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
UEIC6.950.26
+3.89%
Universal Electronics
DXC16.240.28
+1.75%
DXC Technology Company
EVER24.530.34
+1.41%
EverQuote
BAH108.930.66
+0.61%
Booz Allen Hamilton Holding Corp
BCLI1.16-0.01
-0.85%
Brainstorm Cell Therapeutics

NMGX and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that NMGX and NNOMF have been poorly correlated (+12% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that NMGX and NNOMF's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To NMGX
1D Price
Change %
NMGX100%
N/A
NNOMF - NMGX
12%
Poorly correlated
+0.40%
NPCPF - NMGX
12%
Poorly correlated
N/A
NDEKY - NMGX
6%
Poorly correlated
+0.32%
NDEKF - NMGX
5%
Poorly correlated
N/A
NOPMF - NMGX
2%
Poorly correlated
+2.14%
More

NPCPF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, NPCPF has been loosely correlated with TYOBY. These tickers have moved in lockstep 39% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if NPCPF jumps, then TYOBY could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To NPCPF
1D Price
Change %
NPCPF100%
N/A
TYOBY - NPCPF
39%
Loosely correlated
N/A
TOSCF - NPCPF
23%
Poorly correlated
N/A
NTIC - NPCPF
22%
Poorly correlated
+0.98%
NMGX - NPCPF
12%
Poorly correlated
N/A
NNOMF - NPCPF
5%
Poorly correlated
+0.40%
More