NMGX
Price
$0.61
Change
+$0.03 (+5.17%)
Updated
Jun 9 closing price
Capitalization
11.05M
NNOMF
Price
$0.44
Change
+$0.01 (+2.33%)
Updated
Jun 16 closing price
Capitalization
261.42M
Interact to see
Advertisement

NMGX vs NNOMF

Header iconNMGX vs NNOMF Comparison
Open Charts NMGX vs NNOMFBanner chart's image
NANO MAGIC
Price$0.61
Change+$0.03 (+5.17%)
Volume$213
Capitalization11.05M
Nano One Materials
Price$0.44
Change+$0.01 (+2.33%)
Volume$5.02K
Capitalization261.42M
NMGX vs NNOMF Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
NNOMF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
NMGX vs. NNOMF commentary
Jun 17, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is NMGX is a Hold and NNOMF is a Hold.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Jun 17, 2025
Stock price -- (NMGX: $0.61 vs. NNOMF: $0.44)
Brand notoriety: NMGX and NNOMF are both not notable
Both companies represent the Chemicals: Specialty industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: NMGX: 43% vs. NNOMF: 16%
Market capitalization -- NMGX: $11.05M vs. NNOMF: $261.42M
NMGX [@Chemicals: Specialty] is valued at $11.05M. NNOMF’s [@Chemicals: Specialty] market capitalization is $261.42M. The market cap for tickers in the [@Chemicals: Specialty] industry ranges from $223.16B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Chemicals: Specialty] industry is $9.31B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

NMGX’s FA Score shows that 0 FA rating(s) are green whileNNOMF’s FA Score has 0 green FA rating(s).

  • NMGX’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
  • NNOMF’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
According to our system of comparison, NMGX is a better buy in the long-term than NNOMF.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

NNOMF’s TA Score shows that 3 TA indicator(s) are bullish.

  • NNOMF’s TA Score: 3 bullish, 6 bearish.

Price Growth

NMGX (@Chemicals: Specialty) experienced а 0.00% price change this week, while NNOMF (@Chemicals: Specialty) price change was +0.02% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Chemicals: Specialty industry was -0.68%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +1.81%, and the average quarterly price growth was +0.11%.

Industries' Descriptions

@Chemicals: Specialty (-0.68% weekly)

The specialty chemicals sector includes companies that produce chemicals and industrial gases, which are of relatively high-value, often made to customer specifications. Examples of specialty chemicals are electronic chemicals, industrial gases, coatings, adhesives and sealants, industrial and institutional cleaning chemicals. The products are often valued on the basis of their purposes/performances rather than for their composition. Linde Plc, Ecolab Inc., Air Products and Chemicals, Inc., and Dow, Inc. are some of the largest companies making specialty chemicals.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
NNOMF($261M) has a higher market cap than NMGX($11M). NMGX YTD gains are higher at: 34.800 vs. NNOMF (-21.457). NMGX has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): -2.67M vs. NNOMF (-18.35M). NNOMF has more cash in the bank: 40.1M vs. NMGX (55.8K). NNOMF has less debt than NMGX: NNOMF (1.12M) vs NMGX (1.26M). NMGX has higher revenues than NNOMF: NMGX (2.76M) vs NNOMF (0).
NMGXNNOMFNMGX / NNOMF
Capitalization11M261M4%
EBITDA-2.67M-18.35M15%
Gain YTD34.800-21.457-162%
P/E RatioN/AN/A-
Revenue2.76M0-
Total Cash55.8K40.1M0%
Total Debt1.26M1.12M112%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
NMGX vs NNOMF: Fundamental Ratings
NMGX
NNOMF
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
2311
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
91
Overvalued
76
Overvalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
100100
SMR RATING
1..100
10097
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
6088
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
100100
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
n/a75

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

NNOMF's Valuation (76) in the null industry is in the same range as NMGX (91). This means that NNOMF’s stock grew similarly to NMGX’s over the last 12 months.

NNOMF's Profit vs Risk Rating (100) in the null industry is in the same range as NMGX (100). This means that NNOMF’s stock grew similarly to NMGX’s over the last 12 months.

NNOMF's SMR Rating (97) in the null industry is in the same range as NMGX (100). This means that NNOMF’s stock grew similarly to NMGX’s over the last 12 months.

NMGX's Price Growth Rating (60) in the null industry is in the same range as NNOMF (88). This means that NMGX’s stock grew similarly to NNOMF’s over the last 12 months.

NMGX's P/E Growth Rating (100) in the null industry is in the same range as NNOMF (100). This means that NMGX’s stock grew similarly to NNOMF’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
NNOMF
RSI
ODDS (%)
N/A
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
85%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
90%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
76%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
77%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
86%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 7 days ago
74%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 5 days ago
86%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
86%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
85%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
NNOMF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
STOCK / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
ADUR8.420.31
+3.82%
Aduro Clean Technologies Inc
FINV8.970.27
+3.10%
FinVolution Group
UIS4.520.09
+2.03%
Unisys Corp
FLS47.330.87
+1.87%
Flowserve Corp
STLA9.870.17
+1.75%
Stellantis NV

NMGX and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that NMGX and NNOMF have been poorly correlated (+12% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that NMGX and NNOMF's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To NMGX
1D Price
Change %
NMGX100%
N/A
NNOMF - NMGX
12%
Poorly correlated
+2.35%
NPCPF - NMGX
12%
Poorly correlated
N/A
NDEKY - NMGX
6%
Poorly correlated
-1.37%
NDEKF - NMGX
5%
Poorly correlated
N/A
NOPMF - NMGX
2%
Poorly correlated
-0.25%
More

NNOMF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, NNOMF has been loosely correlated with BIOA. These tickers have moved in lockstep 43% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if NNOMF jumps, then BIOA could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To NNOMF
1D Price
Change %
NNOMF100%
+2.35%
BIOA - NNOMF
43%
Loosely correlated
-3.10%
ECVT - NNOMF
28%
Poorly correlated
+1.27%
SXYAY - NNOMF
26%
Poorly correlated
+1.41%
BNTGY - NNOMF
24%
Poorly correlated
-0.79%
BASFY - NNOMF
23%
Poorly correlated
+0.46%
More