Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
NMGCX vs VMGMX
NMGCX vs VMGMX Comparison
Open Charts NMGCX vs VMGMX
Neuberger Berman Mid Cap Growth C
Price$19.10
Change-$0.09 (-0.47%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets2.11B
Vanguard Mid-Cap Growth Index Admiral
Price$124.60
Change+$0.02 (+0.02%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets33.08B
NMGCX vs VMGMX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
NMGCX vs. VMGMX commentary
Oct 19, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is NMGCX is a StrongBuy and VMGMX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
VMGMX has more cash in the bank: 33.1B vs. NMGCX (2.11B). VMGMX pays higher dividends than NMGCX: VMGMX (0.62) vs NMGCX (0.00). NMGCX was incepted earlier than VMGMX: NMGCX (16 years) vs VMGMX (14 years). NMGCX (1.81) is less costly to investors than VMGMX (0.07). NMGCX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 97.00 vs. VMGMX (21.00). NMGCX has a lower initial minimum investment than VMGMX: NMGCX (1000) vs VMGMX (3000). VMGMX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 15.75 vs. NMGCX (3.06). VMGMX return over 5 years is better than : 52.70 vs. NMGCX (-8.72).
| NMGCX | VMGMX | NMGCX / VMGMX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.81 | 0.07 | 2,586% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.81 | 0.07 | 2,586% |
| Fund Existence | 16 years | 14 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 11.574 | 14.126 | 82% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000 | 3000 | 33% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 2.11B | 33.1B | 6% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.00 | 0.62 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | 3.06 | 15.75 | 19% |
| Returns for 3 years | 37.57 | 66.70 | 56% |
| Returns for 5 years | -8.72 | 52.70 | -17% |
| Returns for 10 years | 26.84 | 188.43 | 14% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers