Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
NMGCX vs VMGMX
NMGCX vs VMGMX Comparison
Open Charts NMGCX vs VMGMX
Neuberger Berman Mid Cap Growth C
Price$18.45
Change+$0.03 (+0.16%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets2.03B
Vanguard Mid-Cap Growth Index Admiral
Price$122.54
Change+$1.07 (+0.88%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets33.11B
NMGCX vs VMGMX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
NMGCX vs. VMGMX commentary
Dec 04, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is NMGCX is a Buy and VMGMX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
VMGMX has more cash in the bank: 33.1B vs. NMGCX (2.03B). VMGMX pays higher dividends than NMGCX: VMGMX (0.64) vs NMGCX (0.00). NMGCX was incepted earlier than VMGMX: NMGCX (17 years) vs VMGMX (14 years). NMGCX (1.81) is less costly to investors than VMGMX (0.07). NMGCX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 97.00 vs. VMGMX (21.00). NMGCX has a lower initial minimum investment than VMGMX: NMGCX (1000) vs VMGMX (3000). VMGMX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 3.93 vs. NMGCX (-8.66). VMGMX return over 5 years is better than : 38.34 vs. NMGCX (-17.11).
| NMGCX | VMGMX | NMGCX / VMGMX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.81 | 0.07 | 2,586% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.81 | 0.07 | 2,586% |
| Fund Existence | 17 years | 14 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 7.485 | 10.865 | 69% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000 | 3000 | 33% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 2.03B | 33.1B | 6% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.00 | 0.64 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | -8.66 | 3.93 | -220% |
| Returns for 3 years | 21.79 | 46.01 | 47% |
| Returns for 5 years | -17.11 | 38.34 | -45% |
| Returns for 10 years | 21.83 | 178.10 | 12% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement