Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
NMGCX vs VMGMX
NMGCX vs VMGMX Comparison
Open Charts NMGCX vs VMGMX
Neuberger Berman Mid Cap Growth C
Price$17.08
Change-$0.19 (-1.10%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets1.92B
Vanguard Mid-Cap Growth Index Admiral
Price$116.24
Change-$1.35 (-1.15%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets29.66B
NMGCX vs VMGMX Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
NMGCX vs. VMGMX commentary
Jun 15, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is NMGCX is a Hold and VMGMX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
VMGMX has more cash in the bank: 29.7B vs. NMGCX (1.92B). VMGMX pays higher dividends than NMGCX: VMGMX (0.65) vs NMGCX (0.00). NMGCX was incepted earlier than VMGMX: NMGCX (16 years) vs VMGMX (14 years). NMGCX (1.81) is less costly to investors than VMGMX (0.07). NMGCX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 97.00 vs. VMGMX (21.00). NMGCX has a lower initial minimum investment than VMGMX: NMGCX (1000) vs VMGMX (3000). VMGMX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 16.87 vs. NMGCX (5.82). VMGMX return over 5 years is better than : 70.11 vs. NMGCX (5.63).
| NMGCX | VMGMX | NMGCX / VMGMX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.81 | 0.07 | 2,586% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.81 | 0.07 | 2,586% |
| Fund Existence | 16 years | 14 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 4.465 | 6.409 | 70% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000 | 3000 | 33% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 1.92B | 29.7B | 6% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.00 | 0.65 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | 5.82 | 16.87 | 35% |
| Returns for 3 years | 30.18 | 56.95 | 53% |
| Returns for 5 years | 5.63 | 70.11 | 8% |
| Returns for 10 years | 10.26 | 153.84 | 7% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement