Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
NMGCX vs VMGIX
NMGCX vs VMGIX Comparison
Open Charts NMGCX vs VMGIX
Neuberger Berman Mid Cap Growth C
Price$18.59
Change+$0.23 (+1.25%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets2.11B
Vanguard Mid-Cap Growth Index Investor
Price$113.99
Change+$0.90 (+0.80%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets32.29B
NMGCX vs VMGIX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
NMGCX vs. VMGIX commentary
Sep 10, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is NMGCX is a Buy and VMGIX is a StrongBuy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
VMGIX has more cash in the bank: 32.3B vs. NMGCX (2.11B). VMGIX pays higher dividends than NMGCX: VMGIX (0.51) vs NMGCX (0.00). NMGCX was incepted earlier than VMGIX: NMGCX (16 years) vs VMGIX (19 years). NMGCX (1.81) is less costly to investors than VMGIX (0.19). NMGCX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 97.00 vs. VMGIX (21.00). NMGCX has a lower initial minimum investment than VMGIX: NMGCX (1000) vs VMGIX (3000). VMGIX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 28.02 vs. NMGCX (20.40). VMGIX return over 5 years is better than : 64.96 vs. NMGCX (4.43).
| NMGCX | VMGIX | NMGCX / VMGIX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.81 | 0.19 | 953% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.81 | 0.19 | 953% |
| Fund Existence | 16 years | 19 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 13.700 | 14.236 | 96% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000 | 3000 | 33% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 2.11B | 32.3B | 7% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.00 | 0.51 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | 20.40 | 28.02 | 73% |
| Returns for 3 years | 24.02 | 47.86 | 50% |
| Returns for 5 years | 4.43 | 64.96 | 7% |
| Returns for 10 years | 25.04 | 187.97 | 13% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers