Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
NMGCX vs PMBPX
NMGCX vs PMBPX Comparison
Open Charts NMGCX vs PMBPX
Neuberger Berman Mid Cap Growth C
Price$18.45
Change+$0.03 (+0.16%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets2.03B
NMGCX vs PMBPX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
NMGCX vs. PMBPX commentary
Dec 04, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is NMGCX is a Buy and PMBPX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
PMBPX has more cash in the bank: 31.6B vs. NMGCX (2.03B). PMBPX pays higher dividends than NMGCX: PMBPX (0.01) vs NMGCX (0.00). NMGCX was incepted earlier than PMBPX: NMGCX (17 years) vs PMBPX (25 years). NMGCX (1.81) is less costly to investors than PMBPX (0.83). NMGCX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 97.00 vs. PMBPX (10.50). PMBPX has a lower initial minimum investment than NMGCX: PMBPX (0) vs NMGCX (1000). PMBPX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : -7.88 vs. NMGCX (-8.66). PMBPX return over 5 years is better than : 27.10 vs. NMGCX (-17.11).
| NMGCX | PMBPX | NMGCX / PMBPX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.81 | 0.83 | 218% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.81 | 0.83 | 218% |
| Fund Existence | 17 years | 25 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 7.485 | 1.795 | 417% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000 | 0 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 2.03B | 31.6B | 6% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.00 | 0.01 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | -8.66 | -7.88 | 110% |
| Returns for 3 years | 21.79 | 32.15 | 68% |
| Returns for 5 years | -17.11 | 27.10 | -63% |
| Returns for 10 years | 21.83 | 96.85 | 23% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement