Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
NMGCX vs PMBPX
NMGCX vs PMBPX Comparison
Open Charts NMGCX vs PMBPX
Neuberger Mid Cap Growth C
Price$14.97
Change-$0.06 (-0.40%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets2B
NMGCX vs PMBPX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
NMGCX vs. PMBPX commentary
Dec 28, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is NMGCX is a Hold and PMBPX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
PMBPX has more cash in the bank: 31.2B vs. NMGCX (2B). PMBPX pays higher dividends than NMGCX: PMBPX (0.01) vs NMGCX (0.00). NMGCX was incepted earlier than PMBPX: NMGCX (17 years) vs PMBPX (25 years). NMGCX (1.81) is less costly to investors than PMBPX (0.83). NMGCX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 144.00 vs. PMBPX (10.50). PMBPX has a lower initial minimum investment than NMGCX: PMBPX (0) vs NMGCX (1000). PMBPX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : -4.50 vs. NMGCX (-15.65). PMBPX return over 5 years is better than : 20.39 vs. NMGCX (-29.70).
| NMGCX | PMBPX | NMGCX / PMBPX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.81 | 0.83 | 218% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.81 | 0.83 | 218% |
| Fund Existence | 17 years | 25 years | - |
| Gain YTD | -12.551 | -2.554 | 491% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000 | 0 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 2B | 31.2B | 6% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.00 | 0.01 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | -15.65 | -4.50 | 348% |
| Returns for 3 years | 11.96 | 39.23 | 30% |
| Returns for 5 years | -29.70 | 20.39 | -146% |
| Returns for 10 years | 5.93 | 103.85 | 6% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement