Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
NMGCX vs PMBMX
NMGCX vs PMBMX Comparison
Open Charts NMGCX vs PMBMX
Neuberger Mid Cap Growth C
Price$14.97
Change-$0.06 (-0.40%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets2B
NMGCX vs PMBMX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
NMGCX vs. PMBMX commentary
Dec 28, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is NMGCX is a Hold and PMBMX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
PMBMX has more cash in the bank: 31.2B vs. NMGCX (2B). PMBMX pays higher dividends than NMGCX: PMBMX (0.02) vs NMGCX (0.00). NMGCX was incepted earlier than PMBMX: NMGCX (17 years) vs PMBMX (25 years). NMGCX (1.81) is less costly to investors than PMBMX (1.14). NMGCX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 144.00 vs. PMBMX (10.50). PMBMX has a lower initial minimum investment than NMGCX: PMBMX (0) vs NMGCX (1000). PMBMX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : -5.21 vs. NMGCX (-15.65). PMBMX return over 5 years is better than : 16.99 vs. NMGCX (-29.70).
| NMGCX | PMBMX | NMGCX / PMBMX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.81 | 1.14 | 159% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.81 | 1.14 | 159% |
| Fund Existence | 17 years | 25 years | - |
| Gain YTD | -12.551 | -3.280 | 383% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000 | 0 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 2B | 31.2B | 6% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.00 | 0.02 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | -15.65 | -5.21 | 300% |
| Returns for 3 years | 11.96 | 36.89 | 32% |
| Returns for 5 years | -29.70 | 16.99 | -175% |
| Returns for 10 years | 5.93 | 93.63 | 6% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement