Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
NMGCX vs PMBMX
NMGCX vs PMBMX Comparison
Open Charts NMGCX vs PMBMX
Neuberger Berman Mid Cap Growth C
Price$19.10
Change-$0.09 (-0.47%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets2.11B
NMGCX vs PMBMX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
NMGCX vs. PMBMX commentary
Oct 19, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is NMGCX is a StrongBuy and PMBMX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
PMBMX has more cash in the bank: 31.8B vs. NMGCX (2.11B). PMBMX pays higher dividends than NMGCX: PMBMX (0.02) vs NMGCX (0.00). NMGCX was incepted earlier than PMBMX: NMGCX (16 years) vs PMBMX (25 years). NMGCX (1.81) is less costly to investors than PMBMX (1.14). NMGCX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 97.00 vs. PMBMX (10.50). PMBMX has a lower initial minimum investment than NMGCX: PMBMX (0) vs NMGCX (1000). NMGCX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 3.06 vs. PMBMX (-3.39). PMBMX return over 5 years is better than : 32.70 vs. NMGCX (-8.72).
| NMGCX | PMBMX | NMGCX / PMBMX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.81 | 1.14 | 159% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.81 | 1.14 | 159% |
| Fund Existence | 16 years | 25 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 11.574 | 2.007 | 577% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000 | 0 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 2.11B | 31.8B | 7% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.00 | 0.02 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | 3.06 | -3.39 | -91% |
| Returns for 3 years | 37.57 | 47.07 | 80% |
| Returns for 5 years | -8.72 | 32.70 | -27% |
| Returns for 10 years | 26.84 | 92.87 | 29% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers