Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
NMGCX vs PMAQX
NMGCX vs PMAQX Comparison
Open Charts NMGCX vs PMAQX
Neuberger Berman Mid Cap Growth C
Price$18.59
Change+$0.23 (+1.25%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets2.11B
NMGCX vs PMAQX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
NMGCX vs. PMAQX commentary
Sep 09, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is NMGCX is a Buy and PMAQX is a StrongBuy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
PMAQX has more cash in the bank: 33B vs. NMGCX (2.11B). PMAQX pays higher dividends than NMGCX: PMAQX (0.18) vs NMGCX (0.00). NMGCX was incepted earlier than PMAQX: NMGCX (16 years) vs PMAQX (9 years). NMGCX (1.81) is less costly to investors than PMAQX (0.59). NMGCX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 97.00 vs. PMAQX (10.50). PMAQX has a lower initial minimum investment than NMGCX: PMAQX (0) vs NMGCX (1000). NMGCX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 20.40 vs. PMAQX (11.62). PMAQX return over 5 years is better than : 51.98 vs. NMGCX (4.43).
| NMGCX | PMAQX | NMGCX / PMAQX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.81 | 0.59 | 307% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.81 | 0.59 | 307% |
| Fund Existence | 16 years | 9 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 13.700 | 8.156 | 168% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000 | 0 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 2.11B | 33B | 6% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.00 | 0.18 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | 20.40 | 11.62 | 176% |
| Returns for 3 years | 24.02 | 42.63 | 56% |
| Returns for 5 years | 4.43 | 51.98 | 9% |
| Returns for 10 years | 25.04 | N/A | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement