Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
NMGCX vs PMAQX
NMGCX vs PMAQX Comparison
Open Charts NMGCX vs PMAQX
Neuberger Berman Mid Cap Growth C
Price$18.20
Change+$0.21 (+1.17%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets2.05B
NMGCX vs PMAQX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
NMGCX vs. PMAQX commentary
Jul 27, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is NMGCX is a Buy and PMAQX is a StrongBuy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
PMAQX has more cash in the bank: 33.2B vs. NMGCX (2.05B). PMAQX pays higher dividends than NMGCX: PMAQX (0.19) vs NMGCX (0.00). NMGCX was incepted earlier than PMAQX: NMGCX (16 years) vs PMAQX (9 years). NMGCX (1.81) is less costly to investors than PMAQX (0.59). NMGCX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 97.00 vs. PMAQX (10.50). PMAQX has a lower initial minimum investment than NMGCX: PMAQX (0) vs NMGCX (1000). PMAQX (13.98) and NMGCX (13.54) have marching annual gain over last year. PMAQX return over 5 years is better than : 58.81 vs. NMGCX (3.75).
| NMGCX | PMAQX | NMGCX / PMAQX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.81 | 0.59 | 307% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.81 | 0.59 | 307% |
| Fund Existence | 16 years | 9 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 11.315 | 8.761 | 129% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000 | 0 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 2.05B | 33.2B | 6% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.00 | 0.19 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | 13.54 | 13.98 | 97% |
| Returns for 3 years | 32.17 | 50.84 | 63% |
| Returns for 5 years | 3.75 | 58.81 | 6% |
| Returns for 10 years | 17.44 | N/A | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers