Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
NMGCX vs PEMGX
NMGCX vs PEMGX Comparison
Open Charts NMGCX vs PEMGX
Neuberger Berman Mid Cap Growth C
Price$18.26
Change-$0.68 (-3.59%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets2.08B
NMGCX vs PEMGX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
NMGCX vs. PEMGX commentary
Nov 14, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is NMGCX is a Hold and PEMGX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
PEMGX has more cash in the bank: 32B vs. NMGCX (2.08B). NMGCX (0.00) and PEMGX (0.00) have matching dividends . NMGCX was incepted earlier than PEMGX: NMGCX (16 years) vs PEMGX (20 years). NMGCX (1.81) is less costly to investors than PEMGX (0.91). NMGCX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 97.00 vs. PEMGX (10.50). NMGCX (1000) and PEMGX (1000) have matching initial minimum investment requirements. NMGCX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : -3.42 vs. PEMGX (-5.01). PEMGX return over 5 years is better than : 30.49 vs. NMGCX (-10.60).
| NMGCX | PEMGX | NMGCX / PEMGX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.81 | 0.91 | 199% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.81 | 0.91 | 199% |
| Fund Existence | 16 years | 20 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 10.640 | 2.816 | 378% |
| Front Load | N/A | 6% | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000 | 1000 | 100% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 2.08B | 32B | 6% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.00 | 0.00 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | -3.42 | -5.01 | 68% |
| Returns for 3 years | 28.20 | 34.17 | 83% |
| Returns for 5 years | -10.60 | 30.49 | -35% |
| Returns for 10 years | 29.08 | 103.52 | 28% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement