Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
NMGCX vs PCBIX
NMGCX vs PCBIX Comparison
Open Charts NMGCX vs PCBIX
Neuberger Berman Mid Cap Growth C
Price$18.09
Change+$0.03 (+0.17%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets2.03B
Principal MidCap Institutional
Price$47.20
Change-$0.14 (-0.30%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets32.48B
NMGCX vs PCBIX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
NMGCX vs. PCBIX commentary
Aug 18, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is NMGCX is a Hold and PCBIX is a StrongBuy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
PCBIX has more cash in the bank: 32.5B vs. NMGCX (2.04B). PCBIX pays higher dividends than NMGCX: PCBIX (0.12) vs NMGCX (0.00). NMGCX was incepted earlier than PCBIX: NMGCX (16 years) vs PCBIX (24 years). NMGCX (1.81) is less costly to investors than PCBIX (0.67). NMGCX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 97.00 vs. PCBIX (10.50). PCBIX has a lower initial minimum investment than NMGCX: PCBIX (0) vs NMGCX (1000). NMGCX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 10.78 vs. PCBIX (9.35). PCBIX return over 5 years is better than : 46.92 vs. NMGCX (0.21).
| NMGCX | PCBIX | NMGCX / PCBIX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.81 | 0.67 | 270% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.81 | 0.67 | 270% |
| Fund Existence | 16 years | 24 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 10.642 | 5.901 | 180% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000 | 0 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 2.04B | 32.5B | 6% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.00 | 0.12 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | 10.78 | 9.35 | 115% |
| Returns for 3 years | 15.81 | 31.62 | 50% |
| Returns for 5 years | 0.21 | 46.92 | 0% |
| Returns for 10 years | 15.30 | 101.31 | 15% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers