Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
NMGCX vs PCBIX
NMGCX vs PCBIX Comparison
Open Charts NMGCX vs PCBIX
Neuberger Berman Mid Cap Growth C
Price$18.59
Change+$0.23 (+1.25%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets2.11B
Principal MidCap Institutional
Price$48.18
Change+$0.43 (+0.90%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets33.36B
NMGCX vs PCBIX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
NMGCX vs. PCBIX commentary
Sep 09, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is NMGCX is a Buy and PCBIX is a StrongBuy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
PCBIX has more cash in the bank: 33.4B vs. NMGCX (2.11B). PCBIX pays higher dividends than NMGCX: PCBIX (0.12) vs NMGCX (0.00). NMGCX was incepted earlier than PCBIX: NMGCX (16 years) vs PCBIX (25 years). NMGCX (1.81) is less costly to investors than PCBIX (0.67). NMGCX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 97.00 vs. PCBIX (10.50). PCBIX has a lower initial minimum investment than NMGCX: PCBIX (0) vs NMGCX (1000). NMGCX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 20.40 vs. PCBIX (11.52). PCBIX return over 5 years is better than : 51.28 vs. NMGCX (4.43).
| NMGCX | PCBIX | NMGCX / PCBIX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.81 | 0.67 | 270% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.81 | 0.67 | 270% |
| Fund Existence | 16 years | 25 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 13.700 | 8.100 | 169% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000 | 0 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 2.11B | 33.4B | 6% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.00 | 0.12 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | 20.40 | 11.52 | 177% |
| Returns for 3 years | 24.02 | 42.27 | 57% |
| Returns for 5 years | 4.43 | 51.28 | 9% |
| Returns for 10 years | 25.04 | 120.63 | 21% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers