Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
NMGAX vs PCBIX
NMGAX vs PCBIX Comparison
Open Charts NMGAX vs PCBIX
Neuberger Berman Mid Cap Growth A
Price$18.75
Change+$0.03 (+0.16%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets2.03B
Principal MidCap Institutional
Price$47.20
Change-$0.14 (-0.30%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets32.48B
NMGAX vs PCBIX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
NMGAX vs. PCBIX commentary
Aug 18, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is NMGAX is a Buy and PCBIX is a StrongBuy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
PCBIX has more cash in the bank: 32.5B vs. NMGAX (2.04B). PCBIX pays higher dividends than NMGAX: PCBIX (0.12) vs NMGAX (0.00). NMGAX was incepted earlier than PCBIX: NMGAX (16 years) vs PCBIX (24 years). NMGAX (1.06) is less costly to investors than PCBIX (0.67). NMGAX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 97.00 vs. PCBIX (10.50). PCBIX has a lower initial minimum investment than NMGAX: PCBIX (0) vs NMGAX (1000). NMGAX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 11.94 vs. PCBIX (9.35). PCBIX return over 5 years is better than : 46.92 vs. NMGAX (4.77).
| NMGAX | PCBIX | NMGAX / PCBIX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.06 | 0.67 | 158% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.06 | 0.67 | 158% |
| Fund Existence | 16 years | 24 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 11.078 | 5.901 | 188% |
| Front Load | 6% | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000 | 0 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 2.04B | 32.5B | 6% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.00 | 0.12 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | 11.94 | 9.35 | 128% |
| Returns for 3 years | 18.82 | 31.62 | 60% |
| Returns for 5 years | 4.77 | 46.92 | 10% |
| Returns for 10 years | 25.52 | 101.31 | 25% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers