NMFC
Price
$10.30
Change
-$0.06 (-0.58%)
Updated
Aug 15 closing price
Capitalization
1.1B
73 days until earnings call
TURN
Price
$4.42
Change
-$0.00 (-0.00%)
Updated
Aug 15 closing price
Capitalization
44.18M
Interact to see
Advertisement

NMFC vs TURN

Header iconNMFC vs TURN Comparison
Open Charts NMFC vs TURNBanner chart's image
New Mountain Finance
Price$10.30
Change-$0.06 (-0.58%)
Volume$427.98K
Capitalization1.1B
180 Degree Capital
Price$4.42
Change-$0.00 (-0.00%)
Volume$7.07K
Capitalization44.18M
NMFC vs TURN Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
NMFC
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
TURN
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
NMFC vs. TURN commentary
Aug 18, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is NMFC is a Hold and TURN is a Hold.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Aug 18, 2025
Stock price -- (NMFC: $10.30 vs. TURN: $4.42)
Brand notoriety: NMFC and TURN are both not notable
Both companies represent the Investment Managers industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: NMFC: 97% vs. TURN: 27%
Market capitalization -- NMFC: $1.1B vs. TURN: $44.18M
NMFC [@Investment Managers] is valued at $1.1B. TURN’s [@Investment Managers] market capitalization is $44.18M. The market cap for tickers in the [@Investment Managers] industry ranges from $175.76B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Investment Managers] industry is $7.75B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

NMFC’s FA Score shows that 3 FA rating(s) are green whileTURN’s FA Score has 1 green FA rating(s).

  • NMFC’s FA Score: 3 green, 2 red.
  • TURN’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
According to our system of comparison, NMFC is a better buy in the long-term than TURN.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

NMFC’s TA Score shows that 4 TA indicator(s) are bullish while TURN’s TA Score has 2 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • NMFC’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 7 bearish.
  • TURN’s TA Score: 2 bullish, 4 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, NMFC is a better buy in the short-term than TURN.

Price Growth

NMFC (@Investment Managers) experienced а +0.49% price change this week, while TURN (@Investment Managers) price change was +0.87% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Investment Managers industry was +0.77%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +0.84%, and the average quarterly price growth was +29.70%.

Reported Earning Dates

NMFC is expected to report earnings on Oct 29, 2025.

Industries' Descriptions

@Investment Managers (+0.77% weekly)

Investment Managers manage financial assets and other investments of clients. Management includes designing a short- or long-term strategy for buying/holding and selling of portfolio holdings. It can also include tax services and other aspects of financial planning as well. While it is perceived that the industry is faced with growing competition from robo-advisors/digital platforms and passive/ index-tracking funds, many investors still find value in actively managed in-person services that investment management companies often emphasize on. At the same time, many wealth managers are also incorporating digital initiatives/low cost options in addition to their in-person customized services. Their main sources of revenues are fees as a percentage of assets under management, in addition to a certain portion of clients’ gains from asset appreciation. BlackRock, Inc., Blackstone Group Inc and Brookfield Asset Management are some of the major investment management companies.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
NMFC($1.1B) has a higher market cap than TURN($44.2M). TURN YTD gains are higher at: 20.381 vs. NMFC (-2.888). TURN has less debt than NMFC: TURN (36.1K) vs NMFC (1.78B).
NMFCTURNNMFC / TURN
Capitalization1.1B44.2M2,480%
EBITDAN/AN/A-
Gain YTD-2.88820.381-14%
P/E Ratio13.55N/A-
RevenueN/A348K-
Total CashN/A282K-
Total Debt1.78B36.1K4,939,058%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
NMFC vs TURN: Fundamental Ratings
NMFC
TURN
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
5475
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
3
Undervalued
68
Overvalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
22100
SMR RATING
1..100
4194
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
7446
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
2814
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
5050

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

NMFC's Valuation (3) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for TURN (68). This means that NMFC’s stock grew somewhat faster than TURN’s over the last 12 months.

NMFC's Profit vs Risk Rating (22) in the null industry is significantly better than the same rating for TURN (100). This means that NMFC’s stock grew significantly faster than TURN’s over the last 12 months.

NMFC's SMR Rating (41) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for TURN (94). This means that NMFC’s stock grew somewhat faster than TURN’s over the last 12 months.

TURN's Price Growth Rating (46) in the null industry is in the same range as NMFC (74). This means that TURN’s stock grew similarly to NMFC’s over the last 12 months.

TURN's P/E Growth Rating (14) in the null industry is in the same range as NMFC (28). This means that TURN’s stock grew similarly to NMFC’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
NMFCTURN
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
58%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
64%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
30%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
62%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
27%
Bullish Trend 7 days ago
48%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
29%
N/A
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
36%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
46%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
35%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
54%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 5 days ago
40%
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
45%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
37%
Bearish Trend 11 days ago
56%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
56%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
62%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
40%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
53%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
NMFC
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
TURN
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
STOCK / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
UONEK0.730.05
+7.68%
Urban One
TBRG19.280.13
+0.68%
TruBridge
PG154.360.62
+0.40%
Procter & Gamble Company
FLNG25.05-0.18
-0.71%
FLEX LNG Ltd
WH87.91-0.86
-0.97%
Wyndham Hotels & Resorts

NMFC and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, NMFC has been closely correlated with OBDC. These tickers have moved in lockstep 76% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if NMFC jumps, then OBDC could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To NMFC
1D Price
Change %
NMFC100%
-0.58%
OBDC - NMFC
76%
Closely correlated
-1.19%
BCSF - NMFC
75%
Closely correlated
-1.38%
BXSL - NMFC
74%
Closely correlated
-0.50%
TSLX - NMFC
74%
Closely correlated
-1.07%
MFIC - NMFC
74%
Closely correlated
-1.23%
More

TURN and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, TURN has been loosely correlated with FSK. These tickers have moved in lockstep 35% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if TURN jumps, then FSK could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To TURN
1D Price
Change %
TURN100%
-0.05%
FSK - TURN
35%
Loosely correlated
-0.85%
GSBD - TURN
34%
Loosely correlated
-0.98%
NMFC - TURN
32%
Poorly correlated
-0.58%
TSLX - TURN
32%
Poorly correlated
-1.07%
GLAD - TURN
31%
Poorly correlated
-0.95%
More