NMFC
Price
$10.30
Change
-$0.06 (-0.58%)
Updated
Aug 15 closing price
Capitalization
1.1B
73 days until earnings call
OXLCO
Price
$23.28
Change
-$0.00 (-0.00%)
Updated
Aug 15 closing price
Capitalization
N/A
Interact to see
Advertisement

NMFC vs OXLCO

Header iconNMFC vs OXLCO Comparison
Open Charts NMFC vs OXLCOBanner chart's image
New Mountain Finance
Price$10.30
Change-$0.06 (-0.58%)
Volume$427.98K
Capitalization1.1B
Oxford Lane Capital
Price$23.28
Change-$0.00 (-0.00%)
Volume$337
CapitalizationN/A
NMFC vs OXLCO Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
NMFC
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
OXLCO
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
NMFC vs. OXLCO commentary
Aug 18, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is NMFC is a Hold and OXLCO is a Hold.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Aug 18, 2025
Stock price -- (NMFC: $10.30 vs. OXLCO: $23.28)
Brand notoriety: NMFC and OXLCO are both not notable
Both companies represent the Investment Managers industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: NMFC: 97% vs. OXLCO: 14%
Market capitalization -- NMFC: $1.1B vs. OXLCO: $0
NMFC [@Investment Managers] is valued at $1.1B. OXLCO’s [@Investment Managers] market capitalization is $0. The market cap for tickers in the [@Investment Managers] industry ranges from $175.76B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Investment Managers] industry is $7.75B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

NMFC’s FA Score shows that 3 FA rating(s) are green whileOXLCO’s FA Score has 1 green FA rating(s).

  • NMFC’s FA Score: 3 green, 2 red.
  • OXLCO’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
According to our system of comparison, NMFC is a better buy in the long-term than OXLCO.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

NMFC’s TA Score shows that 4 TA indicator(s) are bullish while OXLCO’s TA Score has 4 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • NMFC’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 7 bearish.
  • OXLCO’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 3 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, OXLCO is a better buy in the short-term than NMFC.

Price Growth

NMFC (@Investment Managers) experienced а +0.49% price change this week, while OXLCO (@Investment Managers) price change was +1.21% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Investment Managers industry was +0.77%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +0.84%, and the average quarterly price growth was +29.70%.

Reported Earning Dates

NMFC is expected to report earnings on Oct 29, 2025.

Industries' Descriptions

@Investment Managers (+0.77% weekly)

Investment Managers manage financial assets and other investments of clients. Management includes designing a short- or long-term strategy for buying/holding and selling of portfolio holdings. It can also include tax services and other aspects of financial planning as well. While it is perceived that the industry is faced with growing competition from robo-advisors/digital platforms and passive/ index-tracking funds, many investors still find value in actively managed in-person services that investment management companies often emphasize on. At the same time, many wealth managers are also incorporating digital initiatives/low cost options in addition to their in-person customized services. Their main sources of revenues are fees as a percentage of assets under management, in addition to a certain portion of clients’ gains from asset appreciation. BlackRock, Inc., Blackstone Group Inc and Brookfield Asset Management are some of the major investment management companies.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
OXLCO YTD gains are higher at: 6.949 vs. NMFC (-2.888). OXLCO has less debt than NMFC: OXLCO (487M) vs NMFC (1.78B).
NMFCOXLCONMFC / OXLCO
Capitalization1.1BN/A-
EBITDAN/AN/A-
Gain YTD-2.8886.949-42%
P/E Ratio13.55N/A-
RevenueN/AN/A-
Total CashN/A27.2M-
Total Debt1.78B487M366%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
NMFC vs OXLCO: Fundamental Ratings
NMFC
OXLCO
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
5427
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
3
Undervalued
10
Undervalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
2249
SMR RATING
1..100
41100
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
7453
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
28100
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
5050

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

NMFC's Valuation (3) in the null industry is in the same range as OXLCO (10) in the Investment Trusts Or Mutual Funds industry. This means that NMFC’s stock grew similarly to OXLCO’s over the last 12 months.

NMFC's Profit vs Risk Rating (22) in the null industry is in the same range as OXLCO (49) in the Investment Trusts Or Mutual Funds industry. This means that NMFC’s stock grew similarly to OXLCO’s over the last 12 months.

NMFC's SMR Rating (41) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for OXLCO (100) in the Investment Trusts Or Mutual Funds industry. This means that NMFC’s stock grew somewhat faster than OXLCO’s over the last 12 months.

OXLCO's Price Growth Rating (53) in the Investment Trusts Or Mutual Funds industry is in the same range as NMFC (74) in the null industry. This means that OXLCO’s stock grew similarly to NMFC’s over the last 12 months.

NMFC's P/E Growth Rating (28) in the null industry is significantly better than the same rating for OXLCO (100) in the Investment Trusts Or Mutual Funds industry. This means that NMFC’s stock grew significantly faster than OXLCO’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
NMFCOXLCO
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
58%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
19%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
30%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
18%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
27%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
5%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
29%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
11%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
36%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
8%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
35%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
6%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 5 days ago
40%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
12%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
37%
N/A
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
56%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
19%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
40%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
4%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
NMFC
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
OXLCO
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
STOCK / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
IFRX0.860.04
+4.30%
InflaRx NV
LBRDA61.191.26
+2.10%
Liberty Broadband Corp
FERAU10.50N/A
N/A
Fifth Era Acquisition Corp I
MOV15.95-0.17
-1.05%
Movado Group
WERN28.01-0.30
-1.06%
Werner Enterprises

NMFC and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, NMFC has been closely correlated with OBDC. These tickers have moved in lockstep 76% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if NMFC jumps, then OBDC could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To NMFC
1D Price
Change %
NMFC100%
-0.58%
OBDC - NMFC
76%
Closely correlated
-1.19%
BCSF - NMFC
75%
Closely correlated
-1.38%
BXSL - NMFC
74%
Closely correlated
-0.50%
TSLX - NMFC
74%
Closely correlated
-1.07%
MFIC - NMFC
74%
Closely correlated
-1.23%
More

OXLCO and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, OXLCO has been loosely correlated with EICB. These tickers have moved in lockstep 63% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if OXLCO jumps, then EICB could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To OXLCO
1D Price
Change %
OXLCO100%
+0.54%
EICB - OXLCO
63%
Loosely correlated
-0.20%
OCCIN - OXLCO
58%
Loosely correlated
+0.53%
OCCIO - OXLCO
41%
Loosely correlated
+0.51%
NMFC - OXLCO
21%
Poorly correlated
-0.58%
NTRS - OXLCO
21%
Poorly correlated
-1.92%
More