Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
NMFAX vs RWMFX
NMFAX vs RWMFX Comparison
Open Charts NMFAX vs RWMFX
Nationwide BNY Mellon Dyn US Core A
Price$15.86
Change+$0.06 (+0.38%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets1.53B
American Funds Washington Mutual R5
Price$65.33
Change+$0.27 (+0.42%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets204.03B
NMFAX vs RWMFX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
NMFAX vs. RWMFX commentary
Jul 27, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is NMFAX is a StrongBuy and RWMFX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RWMFX has more cash in the bank: 204B vs. NMFAX (1.53B). RWMFX pays higher dividends than NMFAX: RWMFX (1.48) vs NMFAX (0.87). NMFAX was incepted earlier than RWMFX: NMFAX (27 years) vs RWMFX (23 years). NMFAX (0.87) is less costly to investors than RWMFX (0.31). RWMFX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 29.00 vs. NMFAX (3.54). RWMFX has a lower initial minimum investment than NMFAX: RWMFX (250) vs NMFAX (2000). NMFAX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 13.39 vs. RWMFX (9.60). NMFAX return over 5 years is better than : 69.61 vs. RWMFX (54.74).
| NMFAX | RWMFX | NMFAX / RWMFX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.84 | 0.31 | 271% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.87 | 0.31 | 281% |
| Fund Existence | 27 years | 23 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 8.966 | 7.001 | 128% |
| Front Load | 6% | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 2000 | 250 | 800% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 1.53B | 204B | 1% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.87 | 1.48 | 59% |
| Returns for 1 year | 13.39 | 9.60 | 140% |
| Returns for 3 years | 55.45 | 32.33 | 172% |
| Returns for 5 years | 69.61 | 54.74 | 127% |
| Returns for 10 years | 50.70 | 72.42 | 70% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement