NMEX
Price
$0.05
Change
+$0.01 (+25.00%)
Updated
Jun 27 closing price
Capitalization
5.86M
SIREF
Price
$0.05
Change
-$0.00 (-0.00%)
Updated
Jun 26 closing price
Capitalization
8.93M
Interact to see
Advertisement

NMEX vs SIREF

Header iconNMEX vs SIREF Comparison
Open Charts NMEX vs SIREFBanner chart's image
Northern Minerals & Exploration
Price$0.05
Change+$0.01 (+25.00%)
Volume$19.7K
Capitalization5.86M
Sirios Resources
Price$0.05
Change-$0.00 (-0.00%)
Volume$204.54K
Capitalization8.93M
NMEX vs SIREF Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
NMEX
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
SIREF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
NMEX vs. SIREF commentary
Jun 29, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is NMEX is a Hold and SIREF is a Hold.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Jun 29, 2025
Stock price -- (NMEX: $0.05 vs. SIREF: $0.05)
Brand notoriety: NMEX and SIREF are both not notable
Both companies represent the Precious Metals industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: NMEX: 123% vs. SIREF: 252%
Market capitalization -- NMEX: $5.86M vs. SIREF: $8.93M
NMEX [@Precious Metals] is valued at $5.86M. SIREF’s [@Precious Metals] market capitalization is $8.93M. The market cap for tickers in the [@Precious Metals] industry ranges from $47.49B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Precious Metals] industry is $1.1B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

NMEX’s FA Score shows that 0 FA rating(s) are green whileSIREF’s FA Score has 0 green FA rating(s).

  • NMEX’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
  • SIREF’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
According to our system of comparison, SIREF is a better buy in the long-term than NMEX.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

NMEX’s TA Score shows that 7 TA indicator(s) are bullish while SIREF’s TA Score has 4 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • NMEX’s TA Score: 7 bullish, 0 bearish.
  • SIREF’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 3 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, NMEX is a better buy in the short-term than SIREF.

Price Growth

NMEX (@Precious Metals) experienced а +35.18% price change this week, while SIREF (@Precious Metals) price change was -0.66% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Precious Metals industry was +0.06%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +9.36%, and the average quarterly price growth was +54.26%.

Industries' Descriptions

@Precious Metals (+0.06% weekly)

The Precious Metals industry is engaged in exploring/mining metals that are considered to be rare and/or have a high economic value. Popular precious metals include gold, platinum and silver - all three of which are largely used in jewelry, art and coinage alongwith having some industrial uses as well. Precious metals used in industrial processes include iridium, (used in specialty alloys), and palladium ( used in electronics and chemical applications). Historically, precious metals have traded at much higher prices than common industrial metals. Newmont Goldcorp Corp, Barrick Gold Corp and Freeport-McMoRan are few of the major precious metals producing companies in the U.S.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
SIREF($8.93M) has a higher market cap than NMEX($5.86M). NMEX has higher P/E ratio than SIREF: NMEX (3333.33) vs SIREF (50.51). SIREF YTD gains are higher at: 29.143 vs. NMEX (-73.203). NMEX has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): -150.79K vs. SIREF (-805.44K). SIREF has more cash in the bank: 559K vs. NMEX (6.29K). SIREF has less debt than NMEX: SIREF (40K) vs NMEX (79K). NMEX (0) and SIREF (0) have equivalent revenues.
NMEXSIREFNMEX / SIREF
Capitalization5.86M8.93M66%
EBITDA-150.79K-805.44K19%
Gain YTD-73.20329.143-251%
P/E Ratio3333.3350.516,600%
Revenue00-
Total Cash6.29K559K1%
Total Debt79K40K198%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
NMEX vs SIREF: Fundamental Ratings
NMEX
SIREF
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
7488
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
100
Overvalued
86
Overvalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
88100
SMR RATING
1..100
9890
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
9140
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
7038
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
n/an/a

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

SIREF's Valuation (86) in the null industry is in the same range as NMEX (100). This means that SIREF’s stock grew similarly to NMEX’s over the last 12 months.

NMEX's Profit vs Risk Rating (88) in the null industry is in the same range as SIREF (100). This means that NMEX’s stock grew similarly to SIREF’s over the last 12 months.

SIREF's SMR Rating (90) in the null industry is in the same range as NMEX (98). This means that SIREF’s stock grew similarly to NMEX’s over the last 12 months.

SIREF's Price Growth Rating (40) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for NMEX (91). This means that SIREF’s stock grew somewhat faster than NMEX’s over the last 12 months.

SIREF's P/E Growth Rating (38) in the null industry is in the same range as NMEX (70). This means that SIREF’s stock grew similarly to NMEX’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
NMEXSIREF
RSI
ODDS (%)
N/A
N/A
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
84%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
80%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
58%
N/A
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
48%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
87%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
62%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
82%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
89%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
56%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
67%
N/A
Declines
ODDS (%)
N/A
N/A
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
65%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
90%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
80%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
59%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
NMEX
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
SIREF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
STOCK / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
HLIO33.550.92
+2.82%
Helios Technologies
OLMA4.620.06
+1.32%
Olema Pharmaceuticals
TOON0.740.01
+0.72%
Kartoon Studios
STAG36.200.11
+0.30%
Stag Industrial
JSNSF3.80N/A
N/A
J Sainsbury plc

NMEX and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that NMEX and SIREF have been poorly correlated (+20% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that NMEX and SIREF's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To NMEX
1D Price
Change %
NMEX100%
+32.49%
SIREF - NMEX
20%
Poorly correlated
N/A
LONCF - NMEX
20%
Poorly correlated
-2.56%
GGXXF - NMEX
20%
Poorly correlated
N/A
MWSNF - NMEX
3%
Poorly correlated
-3.84%
NKOSF - NMEX
2%
Poorly correlated
-4.21%
More

SIREF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that SIREF and ARRKF have been poorly correlated (+24% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that SIREF and ARRKF's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To SIREF
1D Price
Change %
SIREF100%
N/A
ARRKF - SIREF
24%
Poorly correlated
N/A
SMDRF - SIREF
23%
Poorly correlated
-3.29%
NMEX - SIREF
20%
Poorly correlated
+32.49%
SITKF - SIREF
6%
Poorly correlated
-0.60%
SMOFF - SIREF
1%
Poorly correlated
-2.49%
More