NMEHF
Price
$5.60
Change
-$0.26 (-4.44%)
Updated
Jul 31 closing price
Capitalization
5.28B
SOHOF
Price
$0.04
Change
-$0.02 (-33.33%)
Updated
Jul 3 closing price
Capitalization
390.83M
Interact to see
Advertisement

NMEHF vs SOHOF

Header iconNMEHF vs SOHOF Comparison
Open Charts NMEHF vs SOHOFBanner chart's image
Nomura Real Estate Holdings
Price$5.60
Change-$0.26 (-4.44%)
Volume$1.16K
Capitalization5.28B
Soho China
Price$0.04
Change-$0.02 (-33.33%)
Volume$700
Capitalization390.83M
NMEHF vs SOHOF Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
NMEHF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
SOHOF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
NMEHF vs. SOHOF commentary
Aug 17, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is NMEHF is a StrongBuy and SOHOF is a Hold.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Aug 17, 2025
Stock price -- (NMEHF: $5.60 vs. SOHOF: $0.04)
Brand notoriety: NMEHF and SOHOF are both not notable
Both companies represent the Real Estate Development industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: NMEHF: 41% vs. SOHOF: 139%
Market capitalization -- NMEHF: $5.28B vs. SOHOF: $390.83M
NMEHF [@Real Estate Development] is valued at $5.28B. SOHOF’s [@Real Estate Development] market capitalization is $390.83M. The market cap for tickers in the [@Real Estate Development] industry ranges from $165.37B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Real Estate Development] industry is $4.3B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

NMEHF’s FA Score shows that 2 FA rating(s) are green whileSOHOF’s FA Score has 1 green FA rating(s).

  • NMEHF’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
  • SOHOF’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
According to our system of comparison, NMEHF is a better buy in the long-term than SOHOF.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

NMEHF’s TA Score shows that 5 TA indicator(s) are bullish while SOHOF’s TA Score has 2 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • NMEHF’s TA Score: 5 bullish, 3 bearish.
  • SOHOF’s TA Score: 2 bullish, 1 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, NMEHF is a better buy in the short-term than SOHOF.

Price Growth

NMEHF (@Real Estate Development) experienced а 0.00% price change this week, while SOHOF (@Real Estate Development) price change was 0.00% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Real Estate Development industry was +3.18%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +2.54%, and the average quarterly price growth was +3.52%.

Industries' Descriptions

@Real Estate Development (+3.18% weekly)

Activities range from the renovation and re-lease of existing buildings to the purchase of raw land and the sale of developed land or parcels to others. Demand for land development business is driven by GDP growth, employment rates, interest rates, and access to/cost of capital. For individual companies in this industry, proper cost estimation and successful bidding play critical roles in their profitability. Large companies could potentially have greater access to capital, while smaller companies can specialize in a specific geographic area or market niche. CBRE Group, VICI Properties Inc and Brookfield Property Partners L.P. are some of the large companies in this industry.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
NMEHF($5.28B) has a higher market cap than SOHOF($391M). NMEHF YTD gains are higher at: 15.535 vs. SOHOF (-47.090).
NMEHFSOHOFNMEHF / SOHOF
Capitalization5.28B391M1,350%
EBITDAN/AN/A-
Gain YTD15.535-47.090-33%
P/E Ratio9.51N/A-
RevenueN/AN/A-
Total CashN/AN/A-
Total DebtN/AN/A-
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
NMEHF vs SOHOF: Fundamental Ratings
NMEHF
SOHOF
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
9632
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
16
Undervalued
87
Overvalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
26100
SMR RATING
1..100
10091
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
5988
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
526
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
3385

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

NMEHF's Valuation (16) in the null industry is significantly better than the same rating for SOHOF (87). This means that NMEHF’s stock grew significantly faster than SOHOF’s over the last 12 months.

NMEHF's Profit vs Risk Rating (26) in the null industry is significantly better than the same rating for SOHOF (100). This means that NMEHF’s stock grew significantly faster than SOHOF’s over the last 12 months.

SOHOF's SMR Rating (91) in the null industry is in the same range as NMEHF (100). This means that SOHOF’s stock grew similarly to NMEHF’s over the last 12 months.

NMEHF's Price Growth Rating (59) in the null industry is in the same range as SOHOF (88). This means that NMEHF’s stock grew similarly to SOHOF’s over the last 12 months.

SOHOF's P/E Growth Rating (6) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for NMEHF (52). This means that SOHOF’s stock grew somewhat faster than NMEHF’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
NMEHFSOHOF
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
27%
N/A
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
23%
N/A
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
43%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
45%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
31%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
38%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
26%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
32%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
20%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
25%
Advances
ODDS (%)
N/A
N/A
Declines
ODDS (%)
N/A
N/A
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
44%
N/A
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
22%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
29%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
NMEHF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
SOHOF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
MFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
JNRRX56.040.20
+0.36%
PGIM Jennison Natural Resources R
ACFDX74.240.20
+0.27%
American Century Focused Dynamic Gr A
JNBSX10.300.01
+0.10%
JPMorgan Income Builder I
CZOVX28.74N/A
N/A
Zacks All-Cap Core Institutional
MAPLX28.15-0.01
-0.04%
Morgan Stanley Inst Advantage L

NMEHF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that NMEHF and MHIVF have been poorly correlated (+26% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that NMEHF and MHIVF's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To NMEHF
1D Price
Change %
NMEHF100%
N/A
MHIVF - NMEHF
26%
Poorly correlated
N/A
UK - NMEHF
26%
Poorly correlated
-1.00%
SOHOF - NMEHF
2%
Poorly correlated
N/A
PKTEF - NMEHF
-4%
Poorly correlated
N/A
PSPSF - NMEHF
-5%
Poorly correlated
N/A
More

SOHOF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that SOHOF and NMEHF have been poorly correlated (+2% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that SOHOF and NMEHF's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To SOHOF
1D Price
Change %
SOHOF100%
N/A
NMEHF - SOHOF
2%
Poorly correlated
N/A
PSPSF - SOHOF
1%
Poorly correlated
N/A
PKTEF - SOHOF
-5%
Poorly correlated
N/A