NMEHF
Price
$5.75
Change
-$0.13 (-2.21%)
Updated
Jun 16 closing price
Capitalization
4.35B
SNLAY
Price
$5.28
Change
+$0.31 (+6.24%)
Updated
Jul 2 closing price
Capitalization
10.01B
Interact to see
Advertisement

NMEHF vs SNLAY

Header iconNMEHF vs SNLAY Comparison
Open Charts NMEHF vs SNLAYBanner chart's image
Nomura Real Estate Holdings
Price$5.75
Change-$0.13 (-2.21%)
Volume$1.84K
Capitalization4.35B
Sino Land
Price$5.28
Change+$0.31 (+6.24%)
Volume$570
Capitalization10.01B
NMEHF vs SNLAY Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
NMEHF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
SNLAY
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
NMEHF vs. SNLAY commentary
Jul 06, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is NMEHF is a Hold and SNLAY is a StrongBuy.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Jul 06, 2025
Stock price -- (NMEHF: $5.75 vs. SNLAY: $5.28)
Brand notoriety: NMEHF and SNLAY are both not notable
Both companies represent the Real Estate Development industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: NMEHF: 28% vs. SNLAY: 21%
Market capitalization -- NMEHF: $4.35B vs. SNLAY: $10.01B
NMEHF [@Real Estate Development] is valued at $4.35B. SNLAY’s [@Real Estate Development] market capitalization is $10.01B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Real Estate Development] industry ranges from $165.37B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Real Estate Development] industry is $5.49B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

NMEHF’s FA Score shows that 1 FA rating(s) are green whileSNLAY’s FA Score has 3 green FA rating(s).

  • NMEHF’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
  • SNLAY’s FA Score: 3 green, 2 red.
According to our system of comparison, SNLAY is a better buy in the long-term than NMEHF.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

NMEHF’s TA Score shows that 3 TA indicator(s) are bullish while SNLAY’s TA Score has 5 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • NMEHF’s TA Score: 3 bullish, 2 bearish.
  • SNLAY’s TA Score: 5 bullish, 1 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, SNLAY is a better buy in the short-term than NMEHF.

Price Growth

NMEHF (@Real Estate Development) experienced а 0.00% price change this week, while SNLAY (@Real Estate Development) price change was +0.95% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Real Estate Development industry was +2.35%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +5.96%, and the average quarterly price growth was +4.21%.

Industries' Descriptions

@Real Estate Development (+2.35% weekly)

Activities range from the renovation and re-lease of existing buildings to the purchase of raw land and the sale of developed land or parcels to others. Demand for land development business is driven by GDP growth, employment rates, interest rates, and access to/cost of capital. For individual companies in this industry, proper cost estimation and successful bidding play critical roles in their profitability. Large companies could potentially have greater access to capital, while smaller companies can specialize in a specific geographic area or market niche. CBRE Group, VICI Properties Inc and Brookfield Property Partners L.P. are some of the large companies in this industry.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
SNLAY($10B) has a higher market cap than NMEHF($4.35B). SNLAY has higher P/E ratio than NMEHF: SNLAY (18.35) vs NMEHF (9.28). NMEHF YTD gains are higher at: 18.630 vs. SNLAY (8.932). NMEHF has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): 119B vs. SNLAY (4.95B). NMEHF has more cash in the bank: 61.4B vs. SNLAY (44.4B). SNLAY has less debt than NMEHF: SNLAY (5.04B) vs NMEHF (1.12T). NMEHF has higher revenues than SNLAY: NMEHF (655B) vs SNLAY (11B).
NMEHFSNLAYNMEHF / SNLAY
Capitalization4.35B10B43%
EBITDA119B4.95B2,405%
Gain YTD18.6308.932209%
P/E Ratio9.2818.3551%
Revenue655B11B5,955%
Total Cash61.4B44.4B138%
Total Debt1.12T5.04B22,244%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
NMEHF vs SNLAY: Fundamental Ratings
NMEHF
SNLAY
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
5050
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
23
Undervalued
12
Undervalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
10067
SMR RATING
1..100
1009
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
5554
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
7211
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
50n/a

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

SNLAY's Valuation (12) in the null industry is in the same range as NMEHF (23). This means that SNLAY’s stock grew similarly to NMEHF’s over the last 12 months.

SNLAY's Profit vs Risk Rating (67) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for NMEHF (100). This means that SNLAY’s stock grew somewhat faster than NMEHF’s over the last 12 months.

SNLAY's SMR Rating (9) in the null industry is significantly better than the same rating for NMEHF (100). This means that SNLAY’s stock grew significantly faster than NMEHF’s over the last 12 months.

SNLAY's Price Growth Rating (54) in the null industry is in the same range as NMEHF (55). This means that SNLAY’s stock grew similarly to NMEHF’s over the last 12 months.

SNLAY's P/E Growth Rating (11) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for NMEHF (72). This means that SNLAY’s stock grew somewhat faster than NMEHF’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
NMEHFSNLAY
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
27%
N/A
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
21%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
43%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
45%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
58%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
32%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
49%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
28%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
55%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
26%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
56%
Advances
ODDS (%)
N/A
N/A
Declines
ODDS (%)
N/A
N/A
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
63%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
2%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
48%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
NMEHF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
SNLAY
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
ETFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
TYO13.700.16
+1.18%
Direxion Daily 7-10 Yr Trs Bear 3X ETF
TMFC64.920.62
+0.96%
Motley Fool 100 ETF
BGH15.750.02
+0.13%
Barings Global Short Duration High Yield Fund
LCDS59.54N/A
N/A
JPMorgan Fundamental Data Sci Lg Cor ETF
COMB21.29-0.06
-0.28%
GraniteShares Blmbrg CmdtyBrdStr NoK1ETF

NMEHF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that NMEHF and MHIVF have been poorly correlated (+26% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that NMEHF and MHIVF's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To NMEHF
1D Price
Change %
NMEHF100%
N/A
MHIVF - NMEHF
26%
Poorly correlated
+5.56%
UK - NMEHF
26%
Poorly correlated
+0.05%
MTSFY - NMEHF
19%
Poorly correlated
-1.30%
MTSFF - NMEHF
16%
Poorly correlated
N/A
SNLAY - NMEHF
8%
Poorly correlated
N/A
More

SNLAY and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that SNLAY and GZTGF have been poorly correlated (+23% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that SNLAY and GZTGF's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To SNLAY
1D Price
Change %
SNLAY100%
N/A
GZTGF - SNLAY
23%
Poorly correlated
N/A
LGFRY - SNLAY
22%
Poorly correlated
-0.37%
BEKE - SNLAY
20%
Poorly correlated
+0.11%
HYSNY - SNLAY
20%
Poorly correlated
N/A
NMEHF - SNLAY
8%
Poorly correlated
N/A
More