NMEHF
Price
$5.60
Change
-$0.26 (-4.44%)
Updated
Jul 31 closing price
Capitalization
5.28B
PSPSF
Price
$171.20
Change
-$2.55 (-1.47%)
Updated
Jul 28 closing price
Capitalization
7.76B
Interact to see
Advertisement

NMEHF vs PSPSF

Header iconNMEHF vs PSPSF Comparison
Open Charts NMEHF vs PSPSFBanner chart's image
Nomura Real Estate Holdings
Price$5.60
Change-$0.26 (-4.44%)
Volume$1.16K
Capitalization5.28B
PSP Swiss Property
Price$171.20
Change-$2.55 (-1.47%)
Volume$100
Capitalization7.76B
NMEHF vs PSPSF Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
NMEHF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
PSPSF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
NMEHF vs. PSPSF commentary
Aug 17, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is NMEHF is a StrongBuy and PSPSF is a Hold.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Aug 17, 2025
Stock price -- (NMEHF: $5.60 vs. PSPSF: $171.20)
Brand notoriety: NMEHF and PSPSF are both not notable
Both companies represent the Real Estate Development industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: NMEHF: 41% vs. PSPSF: 38%
Market capitalization -- NMEHF: $5.28B vs. PSPSF: $7.76B
NMEHF [@Real Estate Development] is valued at $5.28B. PSPSF’s [@Real Estate Development] market capitalization is $7.76B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Real Estate Development] industry ranges from $165.37B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Real Estate Development] industry is $4.3B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

NMEHF’s FA Score shows that 2 FA rating(s) are green whilePSPSF’s FA Score has 2 green FA rating(s).

  • NMEHF’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
  • PSPSF’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
According to our system of comparison, both NMEHF and PSPSF are a good buy in the long-term.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

NMEHF’s TA Score shows that 5 TA indicator(s) are bullish while PSPSF’s TA Score has 2 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • NMEHF’s TA Score: 5 bullish, 3 bearish.
  • PSPSF’s TA Score: 2 bullish, 1 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, NMEHF is a better buy in the short-term than PSPSF.

Price Growth

NMEHF (@Real Estate Development) experienced а 0.00% price change this week, while PSPSF (@Real Estate Development) price change was 0.00% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Real Estate Development industry was +3.18%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +2.54%, and the average quarterly price growth was +3.52%.

Industries' Descriptions

@Real Estate Development (+3.18% weekly)

Activities range from the renovation and re-lease of existing buildings to the purchase of raw land and the sale of developed land or parcels to others. Demand for land development business is driven by GDP growth, employment rates, interest rates, and access to/cost of capital. For individual companies in this industry, proper cost estimation and successful bidding play critical roles in their profitability. Large companies could potentially have greater access to capital, while smaller companies can specialize in a specific geographic area or market niche. CBRE Group, VICI Properties Inc and Brookfield Property Partners L.P. are some of the large companies in this industry.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
PSPSF($7.76B) has a higher market cap than NMEHF($5.28B). PSPSF has higher P/E ratio than NMEHF: PSPSF (17.85) vs NMEHF (9.51). PSPSF YTD gains are higher at: 23.165 vs. NMEHF (15.535).
NMEHFPSPSFNMEHF / PSPSF
Capitalization5.28B7.76B68%
EBITDAN/A469M-
Gain YTD15.53523.16567%
P/E Ratio9.5117.8553%
RevenueN/A362M-
Total CashN/A34.3M-
Total DebtN/A2.16B-
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
NMEHF vs PSPSF: Fundamental Ratings
NMEHF
PSPSF
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
9635
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
16
Undervalued
22
Undervalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
2632
SMR RATING
1..100
10080
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
5951
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
5264
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
33n/a

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

NMEHF's Valuation (16) in the null industry is in the same range as PSPSF (22). This means that NMEHF’s stock grew similarly to PSPSF’s over the last 12 months.

NMEHF's Profit vs Risk Rating (26) in the null industry is in the same range as PSPSF (32). This means that NMEHF’s stock grew similarly to PSPSF’s over the last 12 months.

PSPSF's SMR Rating (80) in the null industry is in the same range as NMEHF (100). This means that PSPSF’s stock grew similarly to NMEHF’s over the last 12 months.

PSPSF's Price Growth Rating (51) in the null industry is in the same range as NMEHF (59). This means that PSPSF’s stock grew similarly to NMEHF’s over the last 12 months.

NMEHF's P/E Growth Rating (52) in the null industry is in the same range as PSPSF (64). This means that NMEHF’s stock grew similarly to PSPSF’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
NMEHFPSPSF
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
27%
N/A
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
23%
N/A
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
43%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
15%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
31%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
30%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
26%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
24%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
20%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
21%
Advances
ODDS (%)
N/A
N/A
Declines
ODDS (%)
N/A
N/A
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
44%
N/A
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
22%
Bearish Trend 7 days ago
22%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
NMEHF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
PSPSF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
ETFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
RWL106.420.09
+0.08%
Invesco S&P 500 Revenue ETF
UFIV49.06-0.04
-0.08%
F/m US Treasury 5 Year Note ETF
GRW32.30-0.10
-0.30%
TCW Compounders ETF
OALC33.59-0.13
-0.38%
OneAscent Large Cap Core ETF
XSVM55.03-0.49
-0.88%
Invesco S&P SmallCap Value with Momt ETF

NMEHF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that NMEHF and MHIVF have been poorly correlated (+26% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that NMEHF and MHIVF's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To NMEHF
1D Price
Change %
NMEHF100%
N/A
MHIVF - NMEHF
26%
Poorly correlated
N/A
UK - NMEHF
26%
Poorly correlated
-1.00%
SOHOF - NMEHF
2%
Poorly correlated
N/A
PKTEF - NMEHF
-4%
Poorly correlated
N/A
PSPSF - NMEHF
-5%
Poorly correlated
N/A
More

PSPSF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that PSPSF and SOHOF have been poorly correlated (+0% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that PSPSF and SOHOF's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To PSPSF
1D Price
Change %
PSPSF100%
N/A
SOHOF - PSPSF
0%
Poorly correlated
N/A
PKTEF - PSPSF
-0%
Poorly correlated
N/A
NMEHF - PSPSF
-5%
Poorly correlated
N/A