Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
NMCIX vs TRQZX
NMCIX vs TRQZX Comparison
Open Charts NMCIX vs TRQZX
Voya MidCap Opportunities I
Price$24.04
Change-$0.16 (-0.66%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets695.34M
T. Rowe Price Mid-Cap Growth Z
Price$101.89
Change-$0.09 (-0.09%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets25.1B
NMCIX vs TRQZX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
NMCIX vs. TRQZX commentary
Jan 15, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is NMCIX is a Hold and TRQZX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
TRQZX has more cash in the bank: 25.1B vs. NMCIX (695M). TRQZX pays higher dividends than NMCIX: TRQZX (0.74) vs NMCIX (0.00). NMCIX was incepted earlier than TRQZX: NMCIX (27 years) vs TRQZX (6 years). NMCIX (0.96) is less costly to investors than TRQZX (0.61). NMCIX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 87.00 vs. TRQZX (22.60). TRQZX has a lower initial minimum investment than NMCIX: TRQZX (0) vs NMCIX (250000). TRQZX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 1.38 vs. NMCIX (-5.65). TRQZX return over 5 years is better than : -9.90 vs. NMCIX (-17.47).
| NMCIX | TRQZX | NMCIX / TRQZX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.93 | 0.00 | - |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.96 | 0.61 | 157% |
| Fund Existence | 27 years | 6 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 4.114 | 3.631 | 113% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 250000 | 0 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 695M | 25.1B | 3% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.00 | 0.74 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | -5.65 | 1.38 | -409% |
| Returns for 3 years | 17.73 | 10.53 | 168% |
| Returns for 5 years | -17.47 | -9.90 | 176% |
| Returns for 10 years | 13.13 | N/A | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers