Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
NMCCX vs TRQZX
NMCCX vs TRQZX Comparison
Open Charts NMCCX vs TRQZX
Voya MidCap Opportunities C
Price$3.36
Change-$0.05 (-1.47%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets646.5M
T. Rowe Price Mid-Cap Growth Z
Price$98.69
Change+$0.43 (+0.44%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets25.1B
NMCCX vs TRQZX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
NMCCX vs. TRQZX commentary
Feb 05, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is NMCCX is a Hold and TRQZX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
TRQZX has more cash in the bank: 25.1B vs. NMCCX (646M). TRQZX pays higher dividends than NMCCX: TRQZX (0.74) vs NMCCX (0.00). NMCCX was incepted earlier than TRQZX: NMCCX (27 years) vs TRQZX (6 years). NMCCX (1.94) is less costly to investors than TRQZX (0.61). NMCCX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 87.00 vs. TRQZX (22.60). TRQZX has a lower initial minimum investment than NMCCX: TRQZX (0) vs NMCCX (1000). TRQZX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : -5.09 vs. NMCCX (-49.78). TRQZX return over 5 years is better than : -13.86 vs. NMCCX (-74.93).
| NMCCX | TRQZX | NMCCX / TRQZX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.94 | 0.00 | - |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.94 | 0.61 | 318% |
| Fund Existence | 27 years | 6 years | - |
| Gain YTD | -0.292 | -0.061 | 479% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000 | 0 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 646M | 25.1B | 3% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.00 | 0.74 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | -49.78 | -5.09 | 978% |
| Returns for 3 years | -51.08 | 2.38 | -2,149% |
| Returns for 5 years | -74.93 | -13.86 | 541% |
| Returns for 10 years | -77.27 | N/A | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement