Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
NMCCX vs RPMGX
NMCCX vs RPMGX Comparison
Open Charts NMCCX vs RPMGX
Voya MidCap Opportunities C
Price$6.80
Change-$0.03 (-0.44%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets714.2M
T. Rowe Price Mid-Cap Growth
Price$101.88
Change+$0.11 (+0.11%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets27.37B
NMCCX vs RPMGX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
NMCCX vs. RPMGX commentary
Aug 18, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is NMCCX is a Buy and RPMGX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RPMGX has more cash in the bank: 27.4B vs. NMCCX (714M). NMCCX (0.00) and RPMGX (0.00) have matching dividends . NMCCX was incepted earlier than RPMGX: NMCCX (27 years) vs RPMGX (33 years). NMCCX (2.00) is less costly to investors than RPMGX (0.75). NMCCX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 70.00 vs. RPMGX (22.60). NMCCX has a lower initial minimum investment than RPMGX: NMCCX (1000) vs RPMGX (2500). RPMGX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : -3.91 vs. NMCCX (-13.38). RPMGX return over 5 years is better than : 1.34 vs. NMCCX (-54.21).
| NMCCX | RPMGX | NMCCX / RPMGX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 2.00 | 0.75 | 267% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 2.00 | 0.75 | 267% |
| Fund Existence | 27 years | 33 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 5.754 | 2.156 | 267% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000 | 2500 | 40% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 714M | 27.4B | 3% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.00 | 0.00 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | -13.38 | -3.91 | 342% |
| Returns for 3 years | -5.95 | 2.19 | -272% |
| Returns for 5 years | -54.21 | 1.34 | -4,034% |
| Returns for 10 years | -65.93 | 23.24 | -284% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement