Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
NMCAX vs TRQZX
NMCAX vs TRQZX Comparison
Open Charts NMCAX vs TRQZX
Voya MidCap Opportunities A
Price$19.19
Change+$0.19 (+1.00%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets688.79M
T. Rowe Price Mid-Cap Growth Z
Price$104.65
Change-$0.13 (-0.12%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets25.9B
NMCAX vs TRQZX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
TRQZX has more cash in the bank: 25.9B vs. NMCAX (689M). TRQZX pays higher dividends than NMCAX: TRQZX (0.60) vs NMCAX (0.00). NMCAX was incepted earlier than TRQZX: NMCAX (27 years) vs TRQZX (6 years). NMCAX (1.19) is less costly to investors than TRQZX (0.61). NMCAX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 87.00 vs. TRQZX (22.60). TRQZX has a lower initial minimum investment than NMCAX: TRQZX (0) vs NMCAX (1000). TRQZX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : -10.41 vs. NMCAX (-12.98). TRQZX return over 5 years is better than : -6.68 vs. NMCAX (-28.72).
| NMCAX | TRQZX | NMCAX / TRQZX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.19 | 0.00 | - |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.19 | 0.61 | 195% |
| Fund Existence | 27 years | 6 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 4.558 | 4.031 | 113% |
| Front Load | 6% | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000 | 0 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 689M | 25.9B | 3% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.00 | 0.60 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | -12.98 | -10.41 | 125% |
| Returns for 3 years | 20.35 | 10.00 | 204% |
| Returns for 5 years | -28.72 | -6.68 | 430% |
| Returns for 10 years | -18.60 | N/A | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement