Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
NMCAX vs TRQZX
NMCAX vs TRQZX Comparison
Open Charts NMCAX vs TRQZX
Voya MidCap Opportunities A
Price$15.59
Change-$4.24 (-21.38%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets646.5M
T. Rowe Price Mid-Cap Growth Z
Price$98.26
Change-$6.13 (-5.87%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets25.1B
NMCAX vs TRQZX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
NMCAX vs. TRQZX commentary
Feb 04, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is NMCAX is a Hold and TRQZX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
TRQZX has more cash in the bank: 25.1B vs. NMCAX (646M). TRQZX pays higher dividends than NMCAX: TRQZX (0.74) vs NMCAX (0.00). NMCAX was incepted earlier than TRQZX: NMCAX (27 years) vs TRQZX (6 years). NMCAX (1.19) is less costly to investors than TRQZX (0.61). NMCAX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 87.00 vs. TRQZX (22.60). TRQZX has a lower initial minimum investment than NMCAX: TRQZX (0) vs NMCAX (1000). TRQZX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : -5.09 vs. NMCAX (-18.97). TRQZX return over 5 years is better than : -13.86 vs. NMCAX (-34.02).
| NMCAX | TRQZX | NMCAX / TRQZX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.19 | 0.00 | - |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.19 | 0.61 | 195% |
| Fund Existence | 27 years | 6 years | - |
| Gain YTD | -0.383 | -0.061 | 628% |
| Front Load | 6% | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000 | 0 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 646M | 25.1B | 3% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.00 | 0.74 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | -18.97 | -5.09 | 373% |
| Returns for 3 years | -1.58 | 2.38 | -66% |
| Returns for 5 years | -34.02 | -13.86 | 246% |
| Returns for 10 years | -15.82 | N/A | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers