Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
NMCAX vs RPMGX
NMCAX vs RPMGX Comparison
Open Charts NMCAX vs RPMGX
Voya MidCap Opportunities A
Price$19.81
Change+$0.27 (+1.38%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets738.08M
T. Rowe Price Mid-Cap Growth
Price$102.91
Change+$0.52 (+0.51%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets27.99B
NMCAX vs RPMGX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
NMCAX vs. RPMGX commentary
Jul 27, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is NMCAX is a Buy and RPMGX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RPMGX has more cash in the bank: 28B vs. NMCAX (738M). NMCAX (0.00) and RPMGX (0.00) have matching dividends . NMCAX was incepted earlier than RPMGX: NMCAX (27 years) vs RPMGX (33 years). NMCAX (1.25) is less costly to investors than RPMGX (0.75). NMCAX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 70.00 vs. RPMGX (22.60). NMCAX has a lower initial minimum investment than RPMGX: NMCAX (1000) vs RPMGX (2500). NMCAX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 7.66 vs. RPMGX (-0.99). RPMGX return over 5 years is better than : 6.06 vs. NMCAX (-8.75).
| NMCAX | RPMGX | NMCAX / RPMGX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.25 | 0.75 | 167% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.25 | 0.75 | 167% |
| Fund Existence | 27 years | 33 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 8.786 | 3.189 | 276% |
| Front Load | 6% | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000 | 2500 | 40% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 738M | 28B | 3% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.00 | 0.00 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | 7.66 | -0.99 | -773% |
| Returns for 3 years | 37.47 | 12.86 | 291% |
| Returns for 5 years | -8.75 | 6.06 | -144% |
| Returns for 10 years | -16.52 | 27.02 | -61% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement