Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
NMCAX vs RPMGX
NMCAX vs RPMGX Comparison
Open Charts NMCAX vs RPMGX
Voya MidCap Opportunities A
Price$15.96
Change-$0.03 (-0.19%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets678.91M
T. Rowe Price Mid-Cap Growth
Price$98.69
Change+$0.02 (+0.02%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets25.6B
NMCAX vs RPMGX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
NMCAX vs. RPMGX commentary
Dec 28, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is NMCAX is a Hold and RPMGX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RPMGX has more cash in the bank: 25.6B vs. NMCAX (679M). NMCAX (0.00) and RPMGX (0.00) have matching dividends . NMCAX was incepted earlier than RPMGX: NMCAX (27 years) vs RPMGX (34 years). NMCAX (1.19) is less costly to investors than RPMGX (0.75). NMCAX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 87.00 vs. RPMGX (22.60). NMCAX has a lower initial minimum investment than RPMGX: NMCAX (1000) vs RPMGX (2500). RPMGX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : -3.01 vs. NMCAX (-15.29). RPMGX return over 5 years is better than : -12.90 vs. NMCAX (-30.67).
| NMCAX | RPMGX | NMCAX / RPMGX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.19 | 0.75 | 159% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.19 | 0.75 | 159% |
| Fund Existence | 27 years | 34 years | - |
| Gain YTD | -12.356 | -1.043 | 1,185% |
| Front Load | 6% | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000 | 2500 | 40% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 679M | 25.6B | 3% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.00 | 0.00 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | -15.29 | -3.01 | 508% |
| Returns for 3 years | 9.39 | 11.62 | 81% |
| Returns for 5 years | -30.67 | -12.90 | 238% |
| Returns for 10 years | -24.40 | 33.36 | -73% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers