Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
NMCAX vs RPMGX
NMCAX vs RPMGX Comparison
Open Charts NMCAX vs RPMGX
Voya MidCap Opportunities A
Price$19.39
Change+$0.26 (+1.36%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets726.9M
T. Rowe Price Mid-Cap Growth
Price$102.04
Change+$0.43 (+0.42%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets28B
NMCAX vs RPMGX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
NMCAX vs. RPMGX commentary
Jul 06, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is NMCAX is a Buy and RPMGX is a StrongBuy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RPMGX has more cash in the bank: 28B vs. NMCAX (727M). NMCAX (0.00) and RPMGX (0.00) have matching dividends . NMCAX was incepted earlier than RPMGX: NMCAX (27 years) vs RPMGX (33 years). NMCAX (1.25) is less costly to investors than RPMGX (0.75). NMCAX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 70.00 vs. RPMGX (22.60). NMCAX has a lower initial minimum investment than RPMGX: NMCAX (1000) vs RPMGX (2500). NMCAX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 2.65 vs. RPMGX (-1.27). RPMGX return over 5 years is better than : 8.22 vs. NMCAX (-8.49).
| NMCAX | RPMGX | NMCAX / RPMGX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.25 | 0.75 | 167% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.25 | 0.75 | 167% |
| Fund Existence | 27 years | 33 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 6.480 | 2.316 | 280% |
| Front Load | 6% | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000 | 2500 | 40% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 727M | 28B | 3% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.00 | 0.00 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | 2.65 | -1.27 | -209% |
| Returns for 3 years | 39.60 | 15.51 | 255% |
| Returns for 5 years | -8.49 | 8.22 | -103% |
| Returns for 10 years | -17.87 | 25.56 | -70% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement