Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
NMCAX vs RPMGX
NMCAX vs RPMGX Comparison
Open Charts NMCAX vs RPMGX
Voya MidCap Opportunities A
Price$19.69
Change-$0.04 (-0.20%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets723.47M
T. Rowe Price Mid-Cap Growth
Price$103.21
Change+$0.33 (+0.32%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets27.36B
NMCAX vs RPMGX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
NMCAX vs. RPMGX commentary
Sep 08, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is NMCAX is a Hold and RPMGX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RPMGX has more cash in the bank: 27.4B vs. NMCAX (723M). NMCAX (0.00) and RPMGX (0.00) have matching dividends . NMCAX was incepted earlier than RPMGX: NMCAX (27 years) vs RPMGX (33 years). NMCAX (1.25) is less costly to investors than RPMGX (0.75). NMCAX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 87.00 vs. RPMGX (22.60). NMCAX has a lower initial minimum investment than RPMGX: NMCAX (1000) vs RPMGX (2500). NMCAX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 8.97 vs. RPMGX (-2.48). RPMGX return over 5 years is better than : 3.03 vs. NMCAX (-12.72).
| NMCAX | RPMGX | NMCAX / RPMGX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.25 | 0.75 | 167% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.25 | 0.75 | 167% |
| Fund Existence | 27 years | 33 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 8.127 | 3.489 | 233% |
| Front Load | 6% | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000 | 2500 | 40% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 723M | 27.4B | 3% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.00 | 0.00 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | 8.97 | -2.48 | -362% |
| Returns for 3 years | 31.71 | 14.45 | 219% |
| Returns for 5 years | -12.72 | 3.03 | -421% |
| Returns for 10 years | -13.64 | 29.98 | -45% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement