Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
NMANX vs TRQZX
NMANX vs TRQZX Comparison
Open Charts NMANX vs TRQZX
Neuberger Mid Cap Growth I
Price$15.03
Change+$0.10 (+0.67%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets1.98B
T. Rowe Price Mid-Cap Growth Z
Price$99.37
Change+$0.68 (+0.69%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets25.1B
NMANX vs TRQZX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
NMANX vs. TRQZX commentary
Feb 03, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is NMANX is a Hold and TRQZX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
TRQZX has more cash in the bank: 25.1B vs. NMANX (1.98B). TRQZX pays higher dividends than NMANX: TRQZX (0.74) vs NMANX (0.00). NMANX was incepted earlier than TRQZX: NMANX (47 years) vs TRQZX (6 years). NMANX (0.83) is less costly to investors than TRQZX (0.61). NMANX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 144.00 vs. TRQZX (22.60). TRQZX has a lower initial minimum investment than NMANX: TRQZX (0) vs NMANX (1000). TRQZX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : -4.76 vs. NMANX (-17.46). TRQZX return over 5 years is better than : -11.92 vs. NMANX (-28.26).
| NMANX | TRQZX | NMANX / TRQZX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.83 | 0.00 | - |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.83 | 0.61 | 136% |
| Fund Existence | 47 years | 6 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 2.524 | 1.068 | 236% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000 | 0 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 1.98B | 25.1B | 8% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.00 | 0.74 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | -17.46 | -4.76 | 367% |
| Returns for 3 years | 6.60 | 3.53 | 187% |
| Returns for 5 years | -28.26 | -11.92 | 237% |
| Returns for 10 years | 36.33 | N/A | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement