Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
NMANX vs PMBPX
NMANX vs PMBPX Comparison
Open Charts NMANX vs PMBPX
Neuberger Berman Mid Cap Growth I
Price$18.39
Change-$0.53 (-2.80%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets2.07B
NMANX vs PMBPX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
NMANX vs. PMBPX commentary
Dec 14, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is NMANX is a Buy and PMBPX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
PMBPX has more cash in the bank: 30.9B vs. NMANX (2.07B). PMBPX pays higher dividends than NMANX: PMBPX (0.01) vs NMANX (0.00). NMANX was incepted earlier than PMBPX: NMANX (47 years) vs PMBPX (25 years). NMANX (0.85) and PMBPX (0.83) have similar cost to investors . NMANX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 144.00 vs. PMBPX (10.50). PMBPX has a lower initial minimum investment than NMANX: PMBPX (0) vs NMANX (1000). NMANX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : -5.12 vs. PMBPX (-10.82). PMBPX return over 5 years is better than : 22.09 vs. NMANX (-11.09).
| NMANX | PMBPX | NMANX / PMBPX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.85 | 0.83 | 102% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.85 | 0.83 | 102% |
| Fund Existence | 47 years | 25 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 11.098 | -2.922 | -380% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000 | 0 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 2.07B | 30.9B | 7% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.00 | 0.01 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | -5.12 | -10.82 | 47% |
| Returns for 3 years | 32.87 | 29.35 | 112% |
| Returns for 5 years | -11.09 | 22.09 | -50% |
| Returns for 10 years | 36.99 | 96.41 | 38% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement