Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
NMANX vs PMBPX
NMANX vs PMBPX Comparison
Open Charts NMANX vs PMBPX
Neuberger Berman Mid Cap Growth I
Price$18.31
Change-$0.68 (-3.58%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets2.08B
NMANX vs PMBPX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
NMANX vs. PMBPX commentary
Nov 14, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is NMANX is a Hold and PMBPX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
PMBPX has more cash in the bank: 32B vs. NMANX (2.08B). PMBPX pays higher dividends than NMANX: PMBPX (0.01) vs NMANX (0.00). NMANX was incepted earlier than PMBPX: NMANX (47 years) vs PMBPX (25 years). NMANX (0.85) and PMBPX (0.83) have similar cost to investors . NMANX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 97.00 vs. PMBPX (10.50). PMBPX has a lower initial minimum investment than NMANX: PMBPX (0) vs NMANX (1000). NMANX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : -2.21 vs. PMBPX (-4.82). PMBPX return over 5 years is better than : 31.53 vs. NMANX (-5.38).
| NMANX | PMBPX | NMANX / PMBPX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.85 | 0.83 | 102% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.85 | 0.83 | 102% |
| Fund Existence | 47 years | 25 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 11.509 | 2.922 | 394% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000 | 0 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 2.08B | 32B | 6% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.00 | 0.01 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | -2.21 | -4.82 | 46% |
| Returns for 3 years | 32.61 | 34.82 | 94% |
| Returns for 5 years | -5.38 | 31.53 | -17% |
| Returns for 10 years | 35.88 | 106.99 | 34% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement