Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
NMANX vs PMBPX
NMANX vs PMBPX Comparison
Open Charts NMANX vs PMBPX
Neuberger Berman Mid Cap Growth I
Price$18.83
Change+$0.26 (+1.40%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets2.02B
NMANX vs PMBPX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
NMANX vs. PMBPX commentary
Jul 06, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is NMANX is a StrongBuy and PMBPX is a StrongBuy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
PMBPX has more cash in the bank: 32.3B vs. NMANX (2.02B). PMBPX pays higher dividends than NMANX: PMBPX (0.01) vs NMANX (0.00). NMANX was incepted earlier than PMBPX: NMANX (46 years) vs PMBPX (25 years). NMANX (0.85) and PMBPX (0.83) have similar cost to investors . NMANX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 97.00 vs. PMBPX (10.50). PMBPX has a lower initial minimum investment than NMANX: PMBPX (0) vs NMANX (1000). PMBPX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 15.41 vs. NMANX (11.49). PMBPX return over 5 years is better than : 59.60 vs. NMANX (10.96).
| NMANX | PMBPX | NMANX / PMBPX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.85 | 0.83 | 102% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.85 | 0.83 | 102% |
| Fund Existence | 46 years | 25 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 10.570 | 7.041 | 150% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000 | 0 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 2.02B | 32.3B | 6% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.00 | 0.01 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | 11.49 | 15.41 | 75% |
| Returns for 3 years | 40.10 | 52.39 | 77% |
| Returns for 5 years | 10.96 | 59.60 | 18% |
| Returns for 10 years | 23.30 | 104.46 | 22% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers