Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
NMANX vs PMBJX
NMANX vs PMBJX Comparison
Open Charts NMANX vs PMBJX
Neuberger Berman Mid Cap Growth I
Price$18.39
Change-$0.53 (-2.80%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets2.07B
NMANX vs PMBJX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
NMANX vs. PMBJX commentary
Dec 14, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is NMANX is a Buy and PMBJX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
PMBJX has more cash in the bank: 30.9B vs. NMANX (2.07B). PMBJX pays higher dividends than NMANX: PMBJX (0.06) vs NMANX (0.00). NMANX was incepted earlier than PMBJX: NMANX (47 years) vs PMBJX (25 years). NMANX (0.85) is less costly to investors than PMBJX (0.78). NMANX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 144.00 vs. PMBJX (10.50). NMANX (1000) and PMBJX (1000) have matching initial minimum investment requirements. NMANX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : -5.12 vs. PMBJX (-11.31). PMBJX return over 5 years is better than : 20.70 vs. NMANX (-11.09).
| NMANX | PMBJX | NMANX / PMBJX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.85 | 0.78 | 109% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.85 | 0.78 | 109% |
| Fund Existence | 47 years | 25 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 11.098 | -3.284 | -338% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000 | 1000 | 100% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 2.07B | 30.9B | 7% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.00 | 0.06 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | -5.12 | -11.31 | 45% |
| Returns for 3 years | 32.87 | 28.35 | 116% |
| Returns for 5 years | -11.09 | 20.70 | -54% |
| Returns for 10 years | 36.99 | 91.84 | 40% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement