Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
NMANX vs PCBIX
NMANX vs PCBIX Comparison
Open Charts NMANX vs PCBIX
Neuberger Berman Mid Cap Growth I
Price$19.49
Change+$0.24 (+1.25%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets2.08B
Principal MidCap Institutional
Price$48.18
Change+$0.43 (+0.90%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets33.36B
NMANX vs PCBIX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
NMANX vs. PCBIX commentary
Sep 09, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is NMANX is a Buy and PCBIX is a StrongBuy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
PCBIX has more cash in the bank: 33.4B vs. NMANX (2.08B). PCBIX pays higher dividends than NMANX: PCBIX (0.12) vs NMANX (0.00). NMANX was incepted earlier than PCBIX: NMANX (47 years) vs PCBIX (25 years). NMANX (0.85) is less costly to investors than PCBIX (0.67). NMANX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 97.00 vs. PCBIX (10.50). PCBIX has a lower initial minimum investment than NMANX: PCBIX (0) vs NMANX (1000). NMANX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 18.10 vs. PCBIX (9.41). PCBIX return over 5 years is better than : 49.14 vs. NMANX (8.88).
| NMANX | PCBIX | NMANX / PCBIX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.85 | 0.67 | 127% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.85 | 0.67 | 127% |
| Fund Existence | 47 years | 25 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 13.036 | 7.135 | 183% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000 | 0 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 2.08B | 33.4B | 6% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.00 | 0.12 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | 18.10 | 9.41 | 192% |
| Returns for 3 years | 34.99 | 47.03 | 74% |
| Returns for 5 years | 8.88 | 49.14 | 18% |
| Returns for 10 years | 29.63 | 116.70 | 25% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement