NMAKF
Price
$0.17
Change
-$0.01 (-5.56%)
Updated
Jul 31 closing price
Capitalization
644.99M
PHIN
Price
$58.60
Change
+$0.07 (+0.12%)
Updated
Sep 5 closing price
Capitalization
2.28B
65 days until earnings call
Interact to see
Advertisement

NMAKF vs PHIN

Header iconNMAKF vs PHIN Comparison
Open Charts NMAKF vs PHINBanner chart's image
NEMAK S A B DE C V
Price$0.17
Change-$0.01 (-5.56%)
Volume$862
Capitalization644.99M
PHINIA
Price$58.60
Change+$0.07 (+0.12%)
Volume$284.28K
Capitalization2.28B
NMAKF vs PHIN Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
NMAKF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
PHIN
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
NMAKF vs. PHIN commentary
Sep 06, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is NMAKF is a Hold and PHIN is a Buy.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Sep 06, 2025
Stock price -- (NMAKF: $0.17 vs. PHIN: $58.60)
Brand notoriety: NMAKF and PHIN are both not notable
Both companies represent the Auto Parts: OEM industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: NMAKF: 96% vs. PHIN: 67%
Market capitalization -- NMAKF: $644.99M vs. PHIN: $2.28B
NMAKF [@Auto Parts: OEM] is valued at $644.99M. PHIN’s [@Auto Parts: OEM] market capitalization is $2.28B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Auto Parts: OEM] industry ranges from $88.96B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Auto Parts: OEM] industry is $6.59B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

NMAKF’s FA Score shows that 1 FA rating(s) are green whilePHIN’s FA Score has 1 green FA rating(s).

  • NMAKF’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
  • PHIN’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
According to our system of comparison, NMAKF is a better buy in the long-term than PHIN.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

NMAKF’s TA Score shows that 3 TA indicator(s) are bullish while PHIN’s TA Score has 3 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • NMAKF’s TA Score: 3 bullish, 3 bearish.
  • PHIN’s TA Score: 3 bullish, 5 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, NMAKF is a better buy in the short-term than PHIN.

Price Growth

NMAKF (@Auto Parts: OEM) experienced а 0.00% price change this week, while PHIN (@Auto Parts: OEM) price change was +0.21% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Auto Parts: OEM industry was +0.40%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +7.43%, and the average quarterly price growth was +24.63%.

Reported Earning Dates

PHIN is expected to report earnings on Nov 10, 2025.

Industries' Descriptions

@Auto Parts: OEM (+0.40% weekly)

OEM or Original Equipment Manufacturer of auto parts refers to the original producer of a vehicles components, and so OEM car parts are usually identical to the parts used in producing the vehicle in the first place. OEM parts tend to fit the specifications of a particular model, and their compatibility is often guaranteed by the automaker itself. OEM parts could be more expensive to buy (compared to other vendors’ products) when a consumer goes for replacement. However, increased competition from aftermarket parts/third-party vendors could, in some cases, keep EOM prices in check. The industry might progress further in adopting newer technologies like 3D printing to boost supply chain performance and quality. Aptiv PLC, Magna International Inc. and BorgWarner Inc. are major OEMs for autos.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
PHIN($2.28B) has a higher market cap than NMAKF($645M). PHIN has higher P/E ratio than NMAKF: PHIN (22.63) vs NMAKF (19.14). NMAKF YTD gains are higher at: 83.913 vs. PHIN (23.681). PHIN has less debt than NMAKF: PHIN (1.04B) vs NMAKF (1.92B).
NMAKFPHINNMAKF / PHIN
Capitalization645M2.28B28%
EBITDA444MN/A-
Gain YTD83.91323.681354%
P/E Ratio19.1422.6385%
Revenue4.92BN/A-
Total Cash335MN/A-
Total Debt1.92B1.04B184%
TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
NMAKFPHIN
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 5 days ago
27%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
59%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
52%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
45%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
85%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
17%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
52%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
38%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
54%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
42%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
80%
Advances
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
76%
Declines
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
54%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
55%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
43%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
74%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
NMAKF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
PHIN
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
MFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
PSBMX28.170.15
+0.54%
Principal SmallCap R3
IPMSX20.310.04
+0.20%
Voya Index Plus MidCap Port S
FTHSX49.64N/A
N/A
FullerThaler Behavioral Sm-Cp Eq Inst
FEGKX15.93N/A
N/A
Fidelity Equity Growth K6
BCIFX224.52-0.50
-0.22%
Blue Chip Investor

NMAKF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that NMAKF and LAZR have been poorly correlated (+28% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that NMAKF and LAZR's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To NMAKF
1D Price
Change %
NMAKF100%
N/A
LAZR - NMAKF
28%
Poorly correlated
-1.78%
ADNT - NMAKF
20%
Poorly correlated
+0.53%
PASTF - NMAKF
14%
Poorly correlated
N/A
PHIN - NMAKF
4%
Poorly correlated
+0.12%
SCTH - NMAKF
2%
Poorly correlated
N/A
More

PHIN and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, PHIN has been loosely correlated with BWA. These tickers have moved in lockstep 61% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if PHIN jumps, then BWA could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To PHIN
1D Price
Change %
PHIN100%
+0.12%
BWA - PHIN
61%
Loosely correlated
+0.41%
VC - PHIN
60%
Loosely correlated
-0.22%
AXL - PHIN
59%
Loosely correlated
-0.50%
ALV - PHIN
58%
Loosely correlated
+0.09%
ATMU - PHIN
57%
Loosely correlated
+1.10%
More