NLY
Price
$20.86
Change
+$0.30 (+1.46%)
Updated
Jul 25 closing price
Capitalization
9.85B
87 days until earnings call
TWO
Price
$10.45
Change
+$0.05 (+0.48%)
Updated
Jul 25 closing price
Capitalization
1.37B
One day until earnings call
Interact to see
Advertisement

NLY vs TWO

Header iconNLY vs TWO Comparison
Open Charts NLY vs TWOBanner chart's image
Annaly Capital Management
Price$20.86
Change+$0.30 (+1.46%)
Volume$7.15M
Capitalization9.85B
Two Harbors Investment
Price$10.45
Change+$0.05 (+0.48%)
Volume$1.02M
Capitalization1.37B
NLY vs TWO Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
NLY
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
TWO
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
NLY vs. TWO commentary
Jul 28, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is NLY is a Buy and TWO is a Hold.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Jul 28, 2025
Stock price -- (NLY: $20.86 vs. TWO: $10.45)
Brand notoriety: NLY: Notable vs. TWO: Not notable
Both companies represent the Real Estate Investment Trusts industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: NLY: 92% vs. TWO: 49%
Market capitalization -- NLY: $9.85B vs. TWO: $1.37B
NLY [@Real Estate Investment Trusts] is valued at $9.85B. TWO’s [@Real Estate Investment Trusts] market capitalization is $1.37B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Real Estate Investment Trusts] industry ranges from $243.79B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Real Estate Investment Trusts] industry is $5.44B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

NLY’s FA Score shows that 2 FA rating(s) are green whileTWO’s FA Score has 1 green FA rating(s).

  • NLY’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
  • TWO’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
According to our system of comparison, NLY is a better buy in the long-term than TWO.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

NLY’s TA Score shows that 4 TA indicator(s) are bullish while TWO’s TA Score has 3 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • NLY’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 4 bearish.
  • TWO’s TA Score: 3 bullish, 2 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, TWO is a better buy in the short-term than NLY.

Price Growth

NLY (@Real Estate Investment Trusts) experienced а +4.98% price change this week, while TWO (@Real Estate Investment Trusts) price change was +5.88% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Real Estate Investment Trusts industry was +0.93%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +2.25%, and the average quarterly price growth was +1.71%.

Reported Earning Dates

NLY is expected to report earnings on Oct 22, 2025.

TWO is expected to report earnings on Jul 28, 2025.

Industries' Descriptions

@Real Estate Investment Trusts (+0.93% weekly)

A real estate investment trust (REIT) is a company any that owns, and in most cases, operates, income-producing real estate – ranging from office and apartment buildings to warehouses, hospitals, shopping centers, hotels and timberlands. Some REITs are involved in financing real estate. Equity REITs invest in and own properties, while mortgage REITs own and invest in property mortgages. REITs are required by law to pay out at least 90% of their annual taxable income (excluding capital gains) to shareholders in the form of dividends. Some REITs could be more cyclical than others; for example, when an economy is undergoing a recession, hotel REITs could be more vulnerable, compared to say healthcare REIT given that healthcare needs are less likely to depend on economic cycles. American Tower Corporation, Prologis, Inc. and Crown Castle International Corp are some of the biggest REIT companies in the U.S.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
NLY($9.85B) has a higher market cap than TWO($1.37B). TWO has higher P/E ratio than NLY: TWO (666.67) vs NLY (5.03). NLY YTD gains are higher at: 22.401 vs. TWO (-1.406). TWO has less debt than NLY: TWO (1.89B) vs NLY (13.2B). TWO has higher revenues than NLY: TWO (31.8M) vs NLY (-1.44B).
NLYTWONLY / TWO
Capitalization9.85B1.37B719%
EBITDAN/AN/A-
Gain YTD22.401-1.406-1,593%
P/E Ratio5.03666.671%
Revenue-1.44B31.8M-4,518%
Total CashN/A1.25M-
Total Debt13.2B1.89B697%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
NLY vs TWO: Fundamental Ratings
NLY
TWO
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
3960
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
48
Fair valued
6
Undervalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
56100
SMR RATING
1..100
1396
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
4561
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
1571
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
5026

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

TWO's Valuation (6) in the Real Estate Investment Trusts industry is somewhat better than the same rating for NLY (48). This means that TWO’s stock grew somewhat faster than NLY’s over the last 12 months.

NLY's Profit vs Risk Rating (56) in the Real Estate Investment Trusts industry is somewhat better than the same rating for TWO (100). This means that NLY’s stock grew somewhat faster than TWO’s over the last 12 months.

NLY's SMR Rating (13) in the Real Estate Investment Trusts industry is significantly better than the same rating for TWO (96). This means that NLY’s stock grew significantly faster than TWO’s over the last 12 months.

NLY's Price Growth Rating (45) in the Real Estate Investment Trusts industry is in the same range as TWO (61). This means that NLY’s stock grew similarly to TWO’s over the last 12 months.

NLY's P/E Growth Rating (15) in the Real Estate Investment Trusts industry is somewhat better than the same rating for TWO (71). This means that NLY’s stock grew somewhat faster than TWO’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
NLYTWO
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
52%
N/A
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
42%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
64%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
56%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
57%
MACD
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
62%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
49%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
54%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
48%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
51%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
50%
Bullish Trend 5 days ago
53%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 13 days ago
60%
Bearish Trend 10 days ago
66%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
46%
N/A
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
49%
N/A
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
NLY
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
TWO
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
ETFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
PDP113.271.51
+1.35%
Invesco Dorsey Wright Momentum ETF
PMFB25.66N/A
N/A
PGIM S&P 500 Max Buffer ETF - February
EINC95.89-0.45
-0.46%
VanEck Energy Income ETF
CWEB43.95-0.72
-1.61%
Direxion Dly CSI CHN Itnet Bull 2X Shrs
BETH89.31-1.91
-2.09%
ProShares Bitcoin&EtherMktCapWtdETF

NLY and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, NLY has been closely correlated with AGNC. These tickers have moved in lockstep 90% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if NLY jumps, then AGNC could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To NLY
1D Price
Change %
NLY100%
+1.46%
AGNC - NLY
90%
Closely correlated
+0.94%
DX - NLY
86%
Closely correlated
+0.63%
ARR - NLY
84%
Closely correlated
+1.02%
RITM - NLY
80%
Closely correlated
-0.33%
MFA - NLY
79%
Closely correlated
+0.64%
More

TWO and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, TWO has been closely correlated with NLY. These tickers have moved in lockstep 79% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if TWO jumps, then NLY could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To TWO
1D Price
Change %
TWO100%
+0.48%
NLY - TWO
79%
Closely correlated
+1.46%
DX - TWO
76%
Closely correlated
+0.63%
IVR - TWO
76%
Closely correlated
+0.92%
ARR - TWO
76%
Closely correlated
+1.02%
AGNC - TWO
76%
Closely correlated
+0.94%
More