Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
NLSIX vs WPOPX
NLSIX vs WPOPX Comparison
Open Charts NLSIX vs WPOPX
Neuberger Berman Long Short Instl
Price$20.11
Change+$0.02 (+0.10%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets7.97B
Weitz Partners III Opportunity Instl
Price$13.04
Change-$0.03 (-0.23%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets359.16M
NLSIX vs WPOPX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
NLSIX vs. WPOPX commentary
Dec 27, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is NLSIX is a Hold and WPOPX is a StrongBuy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
NLSIX has more cash in the bank: 7.97B vs. WPOPX (359M). WPOPX (0.02) and NLSIX (0.02) have matching dividends . NLSIX was incepted earlier than WPOPX: NLSIX (14 years) vs WPOPX (20 years). NLSIX (1.32) is less costly to investors than WPOPX (1.18). NLSIX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 48.00 vs. WPOPX (25.00). NLSIX (1000000) and WPOPX (1000000) have matching initial minimum investment requirements. NLSIX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 6.40 vs. WPOPX (-3.12). NLSIX return over 5 years is better than : 23.53 vs. WPOPX (-14.17).
| NLSIX | WPOPX | NLSIX / WPOPX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.32 | 1.18 | 112% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.32 | 1.18 | 112% |
| Fund Existence | 14 years | 20 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 7.253 | -1.659 | -437% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000000 | 1000000 | 100% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 7.97B | 359M | 2,220% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.02 | 0.02 | 98% |
| Returns for 1 year | 6.40 | -3.12 | -205% |
| Returns for 3 years | 30.03 | 18.90 | 159% |
| Returns for 5 years | 23.53 | -14.17 | -166% |
| Returns for 10 years | 63.39 | -4.22 | -1,503% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement