Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
NLSIX vs WGLSX
NLSIX vs WGLSX Comparison
Open Charts NLSIX vs WGLSX
Neuberger Berman Long Short Instl
Price$20.17
Change-$0.08 (-0.40%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets8.1B
Wasatch Long/Short Alpha Institutional
Price$12.42
Change-$0.04 (-0.32%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets40.57M
NLSIX vs WGLSX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
NLSIX vs. WGLSX commentary
Nov 14, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is NLSIX is a Hold and WGLSX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
NLSIX has more cash in the bank: 8.1B vs. WGLSX (40.6M). NLSIX pays higher dividends than WGLSX: NLSIX (0.02) vs WGLSX (0.00). NLSIX was incepted earlier than WGLSX: NLSIX (14 years) vs WGLSX (4 years). WGLSX (2.09) is less costly to investors than NLSIX (1.32). NLSIX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 48.00 vs. WGLSX (41.00). WGLSX has a lower initial minimum investment than NLSIX: WGLSX (100000) vs NLSIX (1000000). NLSIX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 8.31 vs. WGLSX (-21.83).
| NLSIX | WGLSX | NLSIX / WGLSX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.32 | 2.07 | 64% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.32 | 2.09 | 63% |
| Fund Existence | 14 years | 4 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 8.000 | -11.943 | -67% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000000 | 100000 | 1,000% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 8.1B | 40.6M | 19,961% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.02 | 0.00 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | 8.31 | -21.83 | -38% |
| Returns for 3 years | 23.64 | 18.10 | 131% |
| Returns for 5 years | 23.72 | N/A | - |
| Returns for 10 years | 65.72 | 42.30 | 155% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement