Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
NLSIX vs RLSIX
NLSIX vs RLSIX Comparison
Open Charts NLSIX vs RLSIX
Neuberger Berman Long Short Instl
Price$19.97
Change-$0.03 (-0.15%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets8.16B
RiverPark Long/Short Opportunity Instl
Price$14.79
Change-$0.83 (-5.31%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets32.91M
NLSIX vs RLSIX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
NLSIX vs. RLSIX commentary
Feb 04, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is NLSIX is a Buy and RLSIX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
NLSIX has more cash in the bank: 8.16B vs. RLSIX (32.9M). NLSIX pays higher dividends than RLSIX: NLSIX (0.05) vs RLSIX (0.00). NLSIX was incepted earlier than RLSIX: NLSIX (14 years) vs RLSIX (14 years). RLSIX (1.89) is less costly to investors than NLSIX (1.32). RLSIX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 20.00 vs. NLSIX (0.96). RLSIX has a lower initial minimum investment than NLSIX: RLSIX (50000) vs NLSIX (1000000). NLSIX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 3.79 vs. RLSIX (1.51). NLSIX return over 5 years is better than : 21.63 vs. RLSIX (-21.54).
| NLSIX | RLSIX | NLSIX / RLSIX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.32 | 1.85 | 71% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.32 | 1.89 | 70% |
| Fund Existence | 14 years | 14 years | - |
| Gain YTD | -0.597 | -4.334 | 14% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000000 | 50000 | 2,000% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 8.16B | 32.9M | 24,809% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.05 | 0.00 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | 3.79 | 1.51 | 251% |
| Returns for 3 years | 26.67 | 49.54 | 54% |
| Returns for 5 years | 21.63 | -21.54 | -100% |
| Returns for 10 years | 71.37 | 56.26 | 127% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement