Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
NLSIX vs RLSFX
NLSIX vs RLSFX Comparison
Open Charts NLSIX vs RLSFX
Neuberger Berman Long Short Instl
Price$20.06
Change-$0.09 (-0.45%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets7.99B
RiverPark Long/Short Opportunity Retail
Price$15.05
Change-$0.14 (-0.92%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets33.94M
NLSIX vs RLSFX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
NLSIX vs. RLSFX commentary
Jan 15, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is NLSIX is a Hold and RLSFX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
NLSIX has more cash in the bank: 7.99B vs. RLSFX (33.9M). NLSIX pays higher dividends than RLSFX: NLSIX (0.05) vs RLSFX (0.00). NLSIX was incepted earlier than RLSFX: NLSIX (14 years) vs RLSFX (14 years). RLSFX (2.17) is less costly to investors than NLSIX (1.32). NLSIX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 48.00 vs. RLSFX (10.00). RLSFX has a lower initial minimum investment than NLSIX: RLSFX (1000) vs NLSIX (1000000). RLSFX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 9.60 vs. NLSIX (7.46). NLSIX return over 5 years is better than : 24.29 vs. RLSFX (-13.55).
| NLSIX | RLSFX | NLSIX / RLSFX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.32 | 2.00 | 66% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.32 | 2.17 | 61% |
| Fund Existence | 14 years | 14 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 0.299 | 0.330 | 90% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000000 | 1000 | 100,000% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 7.99B | 33.9M | 23,581% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.05 | 0.00 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | 7.46 | 9.60 | 78% |
| Returns for 3 years | 28.29 | 71.25 | 40% |
| Returns for 5 years | 24.29 | -13.55 | -179% |
| Returns for 10 years | 72.34 | 56.76 | 127% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement