Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
NLSIX vs RLSFX
NLSIX vs RLSFX Comparison
Open Charts NLSIX vs RLSFX
Neuberger Berman Long Short Instl
Price$20.25
Change-$0.00 (-0.00%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets8.1B
RiverPark Long/Short Opportunity Retail
Price$15.39
Change+$0.01 (+0.07%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets36.45M
NLSIX vs RLSFX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
NLSIX vs. RLSFX commentary
Nov 14, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is NLSIX is a Hold and RLSFX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
NLSIX has more cash in the bank: 8.1B vs. RLSFX (36.4M). NLSIX pays higher dividends than RLSFX: NLSIX (0.02) vs RLSFX (0.00). NLSIX was incepted earlier than RLSFX: NLSIX (14 years) vs RLSFX (14 years). RLSFX (2.17) is less costly to investors than NLSIX (1.32). NLSIX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 48.00 vs. RLSFX (10.00). RLSFX has a lower initial minimum investment than NLSIX: RLSFX (1000) vs NLSIX (1000000). RLSFX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 8.76 vs. NLSIX (8.31). NLSIX return over 5 years is better than : 23.72 vs. RLSFX (-7.68).
| NLSIX | RLSFX | NLSIX / RLSFX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.32 | 2.00 | 66% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.32 | 2.17 | 61% |
| Fund Existence | 14 years | 14 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 8.000 | 10.244 | 78% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000000 | 1000 | 100,000% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 8.1B | 36.4M | 22,264% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.02 | 0.00 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | 8.31 | 8.76 | 95% |
| Returns for 3 years | 23.64 | 69.12 | 34% |
| Returns for 5 years | 23.72 | -7.68 | -309% |
| Returns for 10 years | 65.72 | 47.20 | 139% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement