Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
NLSIX vs RLSFX
NLSIX vs RLSFX Comparison
Open Charts NLSIX vs RLSFX
Neuberger Berman Long Short Instl
Price$19.88
Change-$0.02 (-0.10%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets7.6B
RiverPark Long/Short Opportunity Retail
Price$14.78
Change+$0.02 (+0.14%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets36.52M
NLSIX vs RLSFX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
NLSIX vs. RLSFX commentary
Aug 20, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is NLSIX is a Buy and RLSFX is a StrongBuy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
NLSIX has more cash in the bank: 7.6B vs. RLSFX (36.5M). NLSIX pays higher dividends than RLSFX: NLSIX (0.02) vs RLSFX (0.00). NLSIX was incepted earlier than RLSFX: NLSIX (14 years) vs RLSFX (13 years). RLSFX (2.17) is less costly to investors than NLSIX (1.32). NLSIX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 48.00 vs. RLSFX (10.00). RLSFX has a lower initial minimum investment than NLSIX: RLSFX (1000) vs NLSIX (1000000). RLSFX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 12.48 vs. NLSIX (9.25). NLSIX return over 5 years is better than : 26.47 vs. RLSFX (-5.32).
| NLSIX | RLSFX | NLSIX / RLSFX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.32 | 2.00 | 66% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.32 | 2.17 | 61% |
| Fund Existence | 14 years | 13 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 6.027 | 5.874 | 103% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000000 | 1000 | 100,000% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 7.6B | 36.5M | 20,825% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.02 | 0.00 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | 9.25 | 12.48 | 74% |
| Returns for 3 years | 16.83 | 53.16 | 32% |
| Returns for 5 years | 26.47 | -5.32 | -498% |
| Returns for 10 years | 59.24 | 42.84 | 138% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement