Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
NLSIX vs RLSFX
NLSIX vs RLSFX Comparison
Open Charts NLSIX vs RLSFX
Neuberger Berman Long Short Instl
Price$19.97
Change-$0.03 (-0.15%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets8.16B
RiverPark Long/Short Opportunity Retail
Price$14.47
Change-$0.82 (-5.36%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets32.08M
NLSIX vs RLSFX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
NLSIX vs. RLSFX commentary
Feb 04, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is NLSIX is a Buy and RLSFX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
NLSIX has more cash in the bank: 8.16B vs. RLSFX (32.1M). NLSIX pays higher dividends than RLSFX: NLSIX (0.05) vs RLSFX (0.00). NLSIX was incepted earlier than RLSFX: NLSIX (14 years) vs RLSFX (14 years). RLSFX (2.17) is less costly to investors than NLSIX (1.32). RLSFX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 20.00 vs. NLSIX (0.96). RLSFX has a lower initial minimum investment than NLSIX: RLSFX (1000) vs NLSIX (1000000). NLSIX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 3.79 vs. RLSFX (1.33). NLSIX return over 5 years is better than : 21.63 vs. RLSFX (-22.29).
| NLSIX | RLSFX | NLSIX / RLSFX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.32 | 2.00 | 66% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.32 | 2.17 | 61% |
| Fund Existence | 14 years | 14 years | - |
| Gain YTD | -0.597 | -4.425 | 13% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000000 | 1000 | 100,000% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 8.16B | 32.1M | 25,427% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.05 | 0.00 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | 3.79 | 1.33 | 285% |
| Returns for 3 years | 26.67 | 48.87 | 55% |
| Returns for 5 years | 21.63 | -22.29 | -97% |
| Returns for 10 years | 71.37 | 52.89 | 135% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement