Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
NLSCX vs WPOPX
NLSCX vs WPOPX Comparison
Open Charts NLSCX vs WPOPX
Neuberger Berman Long Short C
Price$18.83
Change-$0.02 (-0.11%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets7.99B
Weitz Partners III Opportunity Instl
Price$13.62
Change+$0.03 (+0.22%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets366.97M
NLSCX vs WPOPX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
NLSCX vs. WPOPX commentary
Dec 04, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is NLSCX is a Buy and WPOPX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
NLSCX has more cash in the bank: 8B vs. WPOPX (367M). WPOPX pays higher dividends than NLSCX: WPOPX (0.02) vs NLSCX (0.00). NLSCX was incepted earlier than WPOPX: NLSCX (14 years) vs WPOPX (20 years). NLSCX (2.43) is less costly to investors than WPOPX (1.18). NLSCX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 48.00 vs. WPOPX (25.00). NLSCX has a lower initial minimum investment than WPOPX: NLSCX (1000) vs WPOPX (1000000). NLSCX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 6.13 vs. WPOPX (-7.72). NLSCX return over 5 years is better than : 15.78 vs. WPOPX (-17.59).
| NLSCX | WPOPX | NLSCX / WPOPX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 2.43 | 1.18 | 206% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 2.43 | 1.18 | 206% |
| Fund Existence | 14 years | 20 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 6.614 | 2.489 | 266% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000 | 1000000 | 0% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 8B | 367M | 2,178% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.00 | 0.02 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | 6.13 | -7.72 | -79% |
| Returns for 3 years | 17.00 | 6.21 | 274% |
| Returns for 5 years | 15.78 | -17.59 | -90% |
| Returns for 10 years | 45.22 | -6.04 | -749% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers