Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
NLSCX vs WPOPX
NLSCX vs WPOPX Comparison
Open Charts NLSCX vs WPOPX
Neuberger Berman Long Short C
Price$18.77
Change+$0.01 (+0.05%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets7.96B
Weitz Partners III Opportunity Instl
Price$13.04
Change-$0.03 (-0.23%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets359.16M
NLSCX vs WPOPX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
NLSCX vs. WPOPX commentary
Dec 27, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is NLSCX is a Hold and WPOPX is a StrongBuy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
NLSCX has more cash in the bank: 7.96B vs. WPOPX (359M). WPOPX pays higher dividends than NLSCX: WPOPX (0.02) vs NLSCX (0.00). NLSCX was incepted earlier than WPOPX: NLSCX (14 years) vs WPOPX (20 years). NLSCX (2.43) is less costly to investors than WPOPX (1.18). NLSCX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 48.00 vs. WPOPX (25.00). NLSCX has a lower initial minimum investment than WPOPX: NLSCX (1000) vs WPOPX (1000000). NLSCX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 5.21 vs. WPOPX (-3.12). NLSCX return over 5 years is better than : 16.51 vs. WPOPX (-14.17).
| NLSCX | WPOPX | NLSCX / WPOPX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 2.43 | 1.18 | 206% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 2.43 | 1.18 | 206% |
| Fund Existence | 14 years | 20 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 6.105 | -1.659 | -368% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000 | 1000000 | 0% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 7.96B | 359M | 2,218% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.00 | 0.02 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | 5.21 | -3.12 | -167% |
| Returns for 3 years | 25.76 | 18.90 | 136% |
| Returns for 5 years | 16.51 | -14.17 | -117% |
| Returns for 10 years | 45.61 | -4.22 | -1,081% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement