Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
NLSCX vs WPOPX
NLSCX vs WPOPX Comparison
Open Charts NLSCX vs WPOPX
Neuberger Berman Long Short C
Price$18.62
Change-$0.09 (-0.48%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets8.16B
Weitz Partners III Opportunity Instl
Price$12.83
Change-$0.88 (-6.42%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets352.84M
NLSCX vs WPOPX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
NLSCX vs. WPOPX commentary
Feb 04, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is NLSCX is a Buy and WPOPX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
NLSCX has more cash in the bank: 8.16B vs. WPOPX (353M). WPOPX pays higher dividends than NLSCX: WPOPX (0.47) vs NLSCX (0.00). NLSCX was incepted earlier than WPOPX: NLSCX (14 years) vs WPOPX (20 years). NLSCX (2.43) is less costly to investors than WPOPX (1.18). WPOPX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 25.00 vs. NLSCX (0.96). NLSCX has a lower initial minimum investment than WPOPX: NLSCX (1000) vs WPOPX (1000000). NLSCX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 2.65 vs. WPOPX (-6.32). NLSCX return over 5 years is better than : 14.66 vs. WPOPX (-18.99).
| NLSCX | WPOPX | NLSCX / WPOPX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 2.43 | 1.18 | 206% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 2.43 | 1.18 | 206% |
| Fund Existence | 14 years | 20 years | - |
| Gain YTD | -0.693 | -0.927 | 75% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000 | 1000000 | 0% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 8.16B | 353M | 2,312% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.00 | 0.47 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | 2.65 | -6.32 | -42% |
| Returns for 3 years | 22.54 | 4.50 | 501% |
| Returns for 5 years | 14.66 | -18.99 | -77% |
| Returns for 10 years | 52.68 | 1.30 | 4,063% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers