Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
NLSCX vs WPOIX
NLSCX vs WPOIX Comparison
Open Charts NLSCX vs WPOIX
Neuberger Berman Long Short C
Price$18.62
Change-$0.09 (-0.48%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets8.16B
Weitz Partners III Opportunity Investor
Price$11.42
Change-$0.83 (-6.78%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets357.43M
NLSCX vs WPOIX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
NLSCX vs. WPOIX commentary
Feb 04, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is NLSCX is a Buy and WPOIX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
NLSCX has more cash in the bank: 8.16B vs. WPOIX (357M). NLSCX (0.00) and WPOIX (0.00) have matching dividends . NLSCX was incepted earlier than WPOIX: NLSCX (14 years) vs WPOIX (15 years). NLSCX (2.43) is less costly to investors than WPOIX (1.93). WPOIX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 25.00 vs. NLSCX (0.96). NLSCX has a lower initial minimum investment than WPOIX: NLSCX (1000) vs WPOIX (2500). NLSCX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 2.65 vs. WPOIX (-7.53). NLSCX return over 5 years is better than : 14.66 vs. WPOIX (-24.12).
| NLSCX | WPOIX | NLSCX / WPOIX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 2.43 | 1.93 | 126% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 2.43 | 1.93 | 126% |
| Fund Existence | 14 years | 15 years | - |
| Gain YTD | -0.693 | -0.954 | 73% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000 | 2500 | 40% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 8.16B | 357M | 2,286% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.00 | 0.00 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | 2.65 | -7.53 | -35% |
| Returns for 3 years | 22.54 | 0.26 | 8,557% |
| Returns for 5 years | 14.66 | -24.12 | -61% |
| Returns for 10 years | 52.68 | -8.86 | -595% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers