Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
NLSCX vs WGLSX
NLSCX vs WGLSX Comparison
Open Charts NLSCX vs WGLSX
Neuberger Berman Long Short C
Price$18.70
Change+$0.03 (+0.16%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets7.82B
Wasatch Long/Short Alpha Institutional
Price$12.44
Change+$0.10 (+0.81%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets40.56M
NLSCX vs WGLSX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
NLSCX vs. WGLSX commentary
Oct 18, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is NLSCX is a Hold and WGLSX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
NLSCX has more cash in the bank: 7.82B vs. WGLSX (40.6M). NLSCX (0.00) and WGLSX (0.00) have matching dividends . NLSCX was incepted earlier than WGLSX: NLSCX (14 years) vs WGLSX (4 years). NLSCX (2.43) is less costly to investors than WGLSX (2.09). NLSCX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 48.00 vs. WGLSX (41.00). NLSCX has a lower initial minimum investment than WGLSX: NLSCX (1000) vs WGLSX (100000). NLSCX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 6.80 vs. WGLSX (-21.37).
| NLSCX | WGLSX | NLSCX / WGLSX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 2.43 | 2.07 | 117% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 2.43 | 2.09 | 116% |
| Fund Existence | 14 years | 4 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 5.709 | -12.085 | -47% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000 | 100000 | 1% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 7.82B | 40.6M | 19,264% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.00 | 0.00 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | 6.80 | -21.37 | -32% |
| Returns for 3 years | 20.33 | 33.19 | 61% |
| Returns for 5 years | 16.30 | N/A | - |
| Returns for 10 years | 42.34 | 41.78 | 101% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement