Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
NLSCX vs WGLSX
NLSCX vs WGLSX Comparison
Open Charts NLSCX vs WGLSX
Neuberger Berman Long Short C
Price$18.62
Change-$0.09 (-0.48%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets8.16B
Wasatch Long/Short Alpha Institutional
Price$12.79
Change+$0.52 (+4.24%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets36.43M
NLSCX vs WGLSX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
NLSCX vs. WGLSX commentary
Feb 04, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is NLSCX is a Buy and WGLSX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
NLSCX has more cash in the bank: 8.16B vs. WGLSX (36.4M). NLSCX (0.00) and WGLSX (0.00) have matching dividends . NLSCX was incepted earlier than WGLSX: NLSCX (14 years) vs WGLSX (4 years). NLSCX (2.43) is less costly to investors than WGLSX (2.09). WGLSX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 39.00 vs. NLSCX (0.96). NLSCX has a lower initial minimum investment than WGLSX: NLSCX (1000) vs WGLSX (100000). NLSCX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 2.65 vs. WGLSX (-12.82).
| NLSCX | WGLSX | NLSCX / WGLSX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 2.43 | 2.07 | 117% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 2.43 | 2.09 | 116% |
| Fund Existence | 14 years | 4 years | - |
| Gain YTD | -0.693 | 3.563 | -19% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000 | 100000 | 1% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 8.16B | 36.4M | 22,423% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.00 | 0.00 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | 2.65 | -12.82 | -21% |
| Returns for 3 years | 22.54 | 15.54 | 145% |
| Returns for 5 years | 14.66 | N/A | - |
| Returns for 10 years | 52.68 | 54.14 | 97% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement