Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
NLSCX vs SRUAX
NLSCX vs SRUAX Comparison
Open Charts NLSCX vs SRUAX
Neuberger Berman Long Short C
Price$18.07
Change-$0.12 (-0.66%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets7.32B
Meeder Spectrum Adviser
Price$13.85
Change-$0.16 (-1.14%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets224.97M
NLSCX vs SRUAX Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
NLSCX vs. SRUAX commentary
Jun 15, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is NLSCX is a Buy and SRUAX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
NLSCX has more cash in the bank: 7.32B vs. SRUAX (225M). SRUAX pays higher dividends than NLSCX: SRUAX (1.24) vs NLSCX (0.00). NLSCX was incepted earlier than SRUAX: NLSCX (13 years) vs SRUAX (9 years). NLSCX (2.43) is less costly to investors than SRUAX (1.43). SRUAX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 260.00 vs. NLSCX (48.00). NLSCX has a lower initial minimum investment than SRUAX: NLSCX (1000) vs SRUAX (2500). NLSCX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 6.23 vs. SRUAX (-1.83). SRUAX return over 5 years is better than : 44.52 vs. NLSCX (22.58).
| NLSCX | SRUAX | NLSCX / SRUAX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 2.43 | 1.43 | 170% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 2.43 | 1.43 | 170% |
| Fund Existence | 13 years | 9 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 2.148 | 0.805 | 267% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000 | 2500 | 40% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 7.32B | 225M | 3,255% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.00 | 1.24 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | 6.23 | -1.83 | -341% |
| Returns for 3 years | 15.61 | 17.87 | 87% |
| Returns for 5 years | 22.58 | 44.52 | 51% |
| Returns for 10 years | 32.27 | N/A | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement