Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
NLSCX vs SPEDX
NLSCX vs SPEDX Comparison
Open Charts NLSCX vs SPEDX
Neuberger Berman Long Short C
Price$18.85
Change-$0.01 (-0.05%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets8.02B
Alger Dynamic Opportunities A
Price$22.32
Change+$0.05 (+0.22%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets229.15M
NLSCX vs SPEDX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
NLSCX vs. SPEDX commentary
Dec 04, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is NLSCX is a Buy and SPEDX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
NLSCX has more cash in the bank: 8.03B vs. SPEDX (229M). NLSCX (0.00) and SPEDX (0.00) have matching dividends . NLSCX was incepted earlier than SPEDX: NLSCX (14 years) vs SPEDX (16 years). NLSCX (2.43) is less costly to investors than SPEDX (2.07). SPEDX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 373.89 vs. NLSCX (48.00). NLSCX (1000) and SPEDX (1000) have matching initial minimum investment requirements. NLSCX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 6.13 vs. SPEDX (5.00). NLSCX (15.78) and SPEDX (15.69) have equivalent 5 years return.
| NLSCX | SPEDX | NLSCX / SPEDX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 2.43 | 2.07 | 117% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 2.43 | 2.07 | 117% |
| Fund Existence | 14 years | 16 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 6.614 | 6.606 | 100% |
| Front Load | N/A | 5% | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000 | 1000 | 100% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 8.03B | 229M | 3,504% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.00 | 0.00 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | 6.13 | 5.00 | 123% |
| Returns for 3 years | 17.00 | 33.83 | 50% |
| Returns for 5 years | 15.78 | 15.69 | 101% |
| Returns for 10 years | 45.22 | 76.61 | 59% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers