Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
NLSCX vs SPEDX
NLSCX vs SPEDX Comparison
Open Charts NLSCX vs SPEDX
Neuberger Berman Long Short C
Price$18.72
Change-$0.00 (-0.00%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets7.96B
Alger Dynamic Opportunities A
Price$22.49
Change+$0.09 (+0.40%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets239.63M
NLSCX vs SPEDX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
NLSCX vs. SPEDX commentary
Jan 16, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is NLSCX is a Hold and SPEDX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
NLSCX has more cash in the bank: 7.96B vs. SPEDX (240M). SPEDX pays higher dividends than NLSCX: SPEDX (0.09) vs NLSCX (0.00). NLSCX was incepted earlier than SPEDX: NLSCX (14 years) vs SPEDX (16 years). NLSCX (2.43) is less costly to investors than SPEDX (2.07). SPEDX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 373.89 vs. NLSCX (48.00). NLSCX (1000) and SPEDX (1000) have matching initial minimum investment requirements. SPEDX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 6.36 vs. NLSCX (5.64). NLSCX return over 5 years is better than : 17.08 vs. SPEDX (12.27).
| NLSCX | SPEDX | NLSCX / SPEDX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 2.43 | 2.07 | 117% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 2.43 | 2.07 | 117% |
| Fund Existence | 14 years | 16 years | - |
| Gain YTD | -0.160 | 1.037 | -15% |
| Front Load | N/A | 5% | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000 | 1000 | 100% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 7.96B | 240M | 3,317% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.00 | 0.09 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | 5.64 | 6.36 | 89% |
| Returns for 3 years | 23.52 | 37.04 | 63% |
| Returns for 5 years | 17.08 | 12.27 | 139% |
| Returns for 10 years | 52.97 | 98.06 | 54% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers