Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
NLSCX vs RLSIX
NLSCX vs RLSIX Comparison
Open Charts NLSCX vs RLSIX
Neuberger Berman Long Short C
Price$18.72
Change-$0.09 (-0.48%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets7.99B
RiverPark Long/Short Opportunity Instl
Price$15.37
Change-$0.15 (-0.97%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets33.94M
NLSCX vs RLSIX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
NLSCX vs. RLSIX commentary
Jan 15, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is NLSCX is a Hold and RLSIX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
NLSCX has more cash in the bank: 7.99B vs. RLSIX (33.9M). NLSCX (0.00) and RLSIX (0.00) have matching dividends . NLSCX was incepted earlier than RLSIX: NLSCX (14 years) vs RLSIX (14 years). NLSCX (2.43) is less costly to investors than RLSIX (1.89). NLSCX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 48.00 vs. RLSIX (10.00). NLSCX has a lower initial minimum investment than RLSIX: NLSCX (1000) vs RLSIX (50000). RLSIX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 9.47 vs. NLSCX (5.64). NLSCX return over 5 years is better than : 17.08 vs. RLSIX (-13.16).
| NLSCX | RLSIX | NLSCX / RLSIX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 2.43 | 1.85 | 131% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 2.43 | 1.89 | 129% |
| Fund Existence | 14 years | 14 years | - |
| Gain YTD | -0.160 | -0.582 | 27% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000 | 50000 | 2% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 7.99B | 33.9M | 23,581% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.00 | 0.00 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | 5.64 | 9.47 | 60% |
| Returns for 3 years | 23.52 | 70.40 | 33% |
| Returns for 5 years | 17.08 | -13.16 | -130% |
| Returns for 10 years | 52.97 | 58.79 | 90% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement