Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
NLSCX vs RLSIX
NLSCX vs RLSIX Comparison
Open Charts NLSCX vs RLSIX
Neuberger Berman Long Short C
Price$18.62
Change-$0.09 (-0.48%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets8.16B
RiverPark Long/Short Opportunity Instl
Price$14.79
Change-$0.83 (-5.31%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets32.91M
NLSCX vs RLSIX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
NLSCX vs. RLSIX commentary
Feb 04, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is NLSCX is a Buy and RLSIX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
NLSCX has more cash in the bank: 8.16B vs. RLSIX (32.9M). NLSCX (0.00) and RLSIX (0.00) have matching dividends . NLSCX was incepted earlier than RLSIX: NLSCX (14 years) vs RLSIX (14 years). NLSCX (2.43) is less costly to investors than RLSIX (1.89). RLSIX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 20.00 vs. NLSCX (0.96). NLSCX has a lower initial minimum investment than RLSIX: NLSCX (1000) vs RLSIX (50000). NLSCX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 2.65 vs. RLSIX (1.51). NLSCX return over 5 years is better than : 14.66 vs. RLSIX (-21.54).
| NLSCX | RLSIX | NLSCX / RLSIX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 2.43 | 1.85 | 131% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 2.43 | 1.89 | 129% |
| Fund Existence | 14 years | 14 years | - |
| Gain YTD | -0.693 | -4.334 | 16% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000 | 50000 | 2% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 8.16B | 32.9M | 24,809% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.00 | 0.00 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | 2.65 | 1.51 | 175% |
| Returns for 3 years | 22.54 | 49.54 | 45% |
| Returns for 5 years | 14.66 | -21.54 | -68% |
| Returns for 10 years | 52.68 | 56.26 | 94% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers