Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
NLSCX vs RLSIX
NLSCX vs RLSIX Comparison
Open Charts NLSCX vs RLSIX
Neuberger Berman Long Short C
Price$18.83
Change-$0.02 (-0.11%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets7.99B
RiverPark Long/Short Opportunity Instl
Price$15.51
Change+$0.07 (+0.45%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets35.73M
NLSCX vs RLSIX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
NLSCX vs. RLSIX commentary
Dec 04, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is NLSCX is a Buy and RLSIX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
NLSCX has more cash in the bank: 8B vs. RLSIX (35.7M). NLSCX (0.00) and RLSIX (0.00) have matching dividends . NLSCX was incepted earlier than RLSIX: NLSCX (14 years) vs RLSIX (14 years). NLSCX (2.43) is less costly to investors than RLSIX (1.89). NLSCX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 48.00 vs. RLSIX (10.00). NLSCX has a lower initial minimum investment than RLSIX: NLSCX (1000) vs RLSIX (50000). NLSCX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 6.13 vs. RLSIX (5.83). NLSCX return over 5 years is better than : 15.78 vs. RLSIX (-11.01).
| NLSCX | RLSIX | NLSCX / RLSIX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 2.43 | 1.85 | 131% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 2.43 | 1.89 | 129% |
| Fund Existence | 14 years | 14 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 6.614 | 8.427 | 78% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000 | 50000 | 2% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 8B | 35.7M | 22,395% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.00 | 0.00 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | 6.13 | 5.83 | 105% |
| Returns for 3 years | 17.00 | 68.56 | 25% |
| Returns for 5 years | 15.78 | -11.01 | -143% |
| Returns for 10 years | 45.22 | 46.54 | 97% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers