Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
NLSCX vs RLSFX
NLSCX vs RLSFX Comparison
Open Charts NLSCX vs RLSFX
Neuberger Berman Long Short C
Price$18.83
Change-$0.02 (-0.11%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets7.99B
RiverPark Long/Short Opportunity Retail
Price$15.21
Change+$0.02 (+0.13%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets35.65M
NLSCX vs RLSFX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
NLSCX vs. RLSFX commentary
Dec 04, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is NLSCX is a Buy and RLSFX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
NLSCX has more cash in the bank: 8B vs. RLSFX (35.7M). NLSCX (0.00) and RLSFX (0.00) have matching dividends . NLSCX was incepted earlier than RLSFX: NLSCX (14 years) vs RLSFX (14 years). NLSCX (2.43) is less costly to investors than RLSFX (2.17). NLSCX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 48.00 vs. RLSFX (10.00). NLSCX (1000) and RLSFX (1000) have matching initial minimum investment requirements. NLSCX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 6.13 vs. RLSFX (5.59). NLSCX return over 5 years is better than : 15.78 vs. RLSFX (-11.90).
| NLSCX | RLSFX | NLSCX / RLSFX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 2.43 | 2.00 | 122% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 2.43 | 2.17 | 112% |
| Fund Existence | 14 years | 14 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 6.614 | 8.238 | 80% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000 | 1000 | 100% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 8B | 35.7M | 22,395% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.00 | 0.00 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | 6.13 | 5.59 | 110% |
| Returns for 3 years | 17.00 | 67.70 | 25% |
| Returns for 5 years | 15.78 | -11.90 | -133% |
| Returns for 10 years | 45.22 | 43.31 | 104% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement