Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
NLSCX vs RLSFX
NLSCX vs RLSFX Comparison
Open Charts NLSCX vs RLSFX
Neuberger Berman Long Short C
Price$18.07
Change-$0.12 (-0.66%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets7.32B
RiverPark Long/Short Opportunity Retail
Price$13.96
Change-$0.18 (-1.27%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets35.53M
NLSCX vs RLSFX Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
NLSCX vs. RLSFX commentary
Jun 16, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is NLSCX is a Buy and RLSFX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
NLSCX has more cash in the bank: 7.32B vs. RLSFX (35.5M). NLSCX (0.00) and RLSFX (0.00) have matching dividends . NLSCX was incepted earlier than RLSFX: NLSCX (13 years) vs RLSFX (13 years). NLSCX (2.43) is less costly to investors than RLSFX (2.17). NLSCX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 48.00 vs. RLSFX (17.00). NLSCX (1000) and RLSFX (1000) have matching initial minimum investment requirements. RLSFX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 6.65 vs. NLSCX (6.23). NLSCX return over 5 years is better than : 22.58 vs. RLSFX (-3.19).
| NLSCX | RLSFX | NLSCX / RLSFX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 2.43 | 2.00 | 122% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 2.43 | 2.17 | 112% |
| Fund Existence | 13 years | 13 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 2.148 | 0.000 | - |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000 | 1000 | 100% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 7.32B | 35.5M | 20,628% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.00 | 0.00 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | 6.23 | 6.65 | 94% |
| Returns for 3 years | 15.61 | 62.51 | 25% |
| Returns for 5 years | 22.58 | -3.19 | -708% |
| Returns for 10 years | 32.27 | 30.70 | 105% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers