Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
NLSCX vs RLSFX
NLSCX vs RLSFX Comparison
Open Charts NLSCX vs RLSFX
Neuberger Berman Long Short C
Price$18.34
Change+$0.07 (+0.38%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets7.45B
RiverPark Long/Short Opportunity Retail
Price$14.65
Change+$0.14 (+0.96%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets36.78M
NLSCX vs RLSFX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
NLSCX vs. RLSFX commentary
Jul 07, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is NLSCX is a Buy and RLSFX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
NLSCX has more cash in the bank: 7.45B vs. RLSFX (36.8M). NLSCX (0.00) and RLSFX (0.00) have matching dividends . NLSCX was incepted earlier than RLSFX: NLSCX (14 years) vs RLSFX (13 years). NLSCX (2.43) is less costly to investors than RLSFX (2.17). NLSCX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 48.00 vs. RLSFX (17.00). NLSCX (1000) and RLSFX (1000) have matching initial minimum investment requirements. RLSFX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 9.17 vs. NLSCX (7.31). NLSCX return over 5 years is better than : 22.50 vs. RLSFX (-3.62).
| NLSCX | RLSFX | NLSCX / RLSFX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 2.43 | 2.00 | 122% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 2.43 | 2.17 | 112% |
| Fund Existence | 14 years | 13 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 3.674 | 4.943 | 74% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000 | 1000 | 100% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 7.45B | 36.8M | 20,253% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.00 | 0.00 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | 7.31 | 9.17 | 80% |
| Returns for 3 years | 15.20 | 64.61 | 24% |
| Returns for 5 years | 22.50 | -3.62 | -622% |
| Returns for 10 years | 35.95 | 37.29 | 96% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement