Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
NLSCX vs RLSFX
NLSCX vs RLSFX Comparison
Open Charts NLSCX vs RLSFX
Neuberger Berman Long Short C
Price$18.74
Change+$0.03 (+0.16%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets7.53B
RiverPark Long/Short Opportunity Retail
Price$14.85
Change+$0.09 (+0.61%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets36.33M
NLSCX vs RLSFX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
NLSCX vs. RLSFX commentary
Sep 09, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is NLSCX is a Buy and RLSFX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
NLSCX has more cash in the bank: 7.53B vs. RLSFX (36.3M). NLSCX (0.00) and RLSFX (0.00) have matching dividends . NLSCX was incepted earlier than RLSFX: NLSCX (14 years) vs RLSFX (13 years). NLSCX (2.43) is less costly to investors than RLSFX (2.17). NLSCX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 48.00 vs. RLSFX (10.00). NLSCX (1000) and RLSFX (1000) have matching initial minimum investment requirements. RLSFX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 14.73 vs. NLSCX (8.71). NLSCX return over 5 years is better than : 18.71 vs. RLSFX (-5.61).
| NLSCX | RLSFX | NLSCX / RLSFX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 2.43 | 2.00 | 122% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 2.43 | 2.17 | 112% |
| Fund Existence | 14 years | 13 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 5.822 | 6.017 | 97% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000 | 1000 | 100% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 7.53B | 36.3M | 20,749% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.00 | 0.00 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | 8.71 | 14.73 | 59% |
| Returns for 3 years | 16.42 | 65.55 | 25% |
| Returns for 5 years | 18.71 | -5.61 | -333% |
| Returns for 10 years | 43.08 | 44.40 | 97% |