Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
NLSCX vs RLSFX
NLSCX vs RLSFX Comparison
Open Charts NLSCX vs RLSFX
Neuberger Berman Long Short C
Price$18.62
Change-$0.09 (-0.48%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets8.16B
RiverPark Long/Short Opportunity Retail
Price$14.47
Change-$0.82 (-5.36%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets32.08M
NLSCX vs RLSFX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
NLSCX vs. RLSFX commentary
Feb 04, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is NLSCX is a Buy and RLSFX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
NLSCX has more cash in the bank: 8.16B vs. RLSFX (32.1M). NLSCX (0.00) and RLSFX (0.00) have matching dividends . NLSCX was incepted earlier than RLSFX: NLSCX (14 years) vs RLSFX (14 years). NLSCX (2.43) is less costly to investors than RLSFX (2.17). RLSFX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 20.00 vs. NLSCX (0.96). NLSCX (1000) and RLSFX (1000) have matching initial minimum investment requirements. NLSCX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 2.65 vs. RLSFX (1.33). NLSCX return over 5 years is better than : 14.66 vs. RLSFX (-22.29).
| NLSCX | RLSFX | NLSCX / RLSFX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 2.43 | 2.00 | 122% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 2.43 | 2.17 | 112% |
| Fund Existence | 14 years | 14 years | - |
| Gain YTD | -0.693 | -4.425 | 16% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000 | 1000 | 100% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 8.16B | 32.1M | 25,427% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.00 | 0.00 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | 2.65 | 1.33 | 199% |
| Returns for 3 years | 22.54 | 48.87 | 46% |
| Returns for 5 years | 14.66 | -22.29 | -66% |
| Returns for 10 years | 52.68 | 52.89 | 100% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers