Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
NLSCX vs QLENX
NLSCX vs QLENX Comparison
Open Charts NLSCX vs QLENX
Neuberger Berman Long Short C
Price$18.76
Change+$0.03 (+0.16%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets7.96B
NLSCX vs QLENX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
NLSCX vs. QLENX commentary
Dec 26, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is NLSCX is a Hold and QLENX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
NLSCX (7.96B) and QLENX (7.91B) have equal amount of cash in the bank . QLENX pays higher dividends than NLSCX: QLENX (5.56) vs NLSCX (0.00). NLSCX was incepted earlier than QLENX: NLSCX (14 years) vs QLENX (12 years). QLENX (5.59) is less costly to investors than NLSCX (2.43). QLENX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 362.00 vs. NLSCX (48.00). NLSCX has a lower initial minimum investment than QLENX: NLSCX (1000) vs QLENX (2500). QLENX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 31.15 vs. NLSCX (5.16). QLENX return over 5 years is better than : 218.96 vs. NLSCX (16.45).
| NLSCX | QLENX | NLSCX / QLENX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 2.43 | 5.58 | 44% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 2.43 | 5.59 | 43% |
| Fund Existence | 14 years | 12 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 6.049 | 32.328 | 19% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000 | 2500 | 40% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 7.96B | 7.91B | 101% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.00 | 5.56 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | 5.16 | 31.15 | 17% |
| Returns for 3 years | 25.44 | 112.35 | 23% |
| Returns for 5 years | 16.45 | 218.96 | 8% |
| Returns for 10 years | 45.89 | 155.73 | 29% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers