Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
NLSCX vs NLSIX
NLSCX vs NLSIX Comparison
Open Charts NLSCX vs NLSIX
Neuberger Berman Long Short C
Price$18.62
Change-$0.09 (-0.48%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets8.16B
Neuberger Berman Long Short Instl
Price$19.97
Change-$0.03 (-0.15%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets8.16B
NLSCX vs NLSIX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
NLSCX vs. NLSIX commentary
Feb 04, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is NLSCX is a Buy and NLSIX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
NLSCX (8.16B) and NLSIX (8.16B) have equal amount of cash in the bank . NLSIX pays higher dividends than NLSCX: NLSIX (0.05) vs NLSCX (0.00). NLSCX was incepted earlier than NLSIX: NLSCX (14 years) vs NLSIX (14 years). NLSCX (2.43) is less costly to investors than NLSIX (1.32). NLSCX (0.96) and NLSIX (0.96) have comparable annual turnover. NLSCX has a lower initial minimum investment than NLSIX: NLSCX (1000) vs NLSIX (1000000). NLSIX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 3.79 vs. NLSCX (2.65). NLSIX return over 5 years is better than : 21.63 vs. NLSCX (14.66).
| NLSCX | NLSIX | NLSCX / NLSIX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 2.43 | 1.32 | 184% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 2.43 | 1.32 | 184% |
| Fund Existence | 14 years | 14 years | - |
| Gain YTD | -0.693 | -0.597 | 116% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000 | 1000000 | 0% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 8.16B | 8.16B | 100% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.00 | 0.05 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | 2.65 | 3.79 | 70% |
| Returns for 3 years | 22.54 | 26.67 | 85% |
| Returns for 5 years | 14.66 | 21.63 | 68% |
| Returns for 10 years | 52.68 | 71.37 | 74% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers