Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
NLSAX vs WPOPX
NLSAX vs WPOPX Comparison
Open Charts NLSAX vs WPOPX
Neuberger Berman Long Short A
Price$19.80
Change-$0.08 (-0.40%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets8.07B
Weitz Partners III Opportunity Instl
Price$13.45
Change-$0.08 (-0.59%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets387.35M
NLSAX vs WPOPX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
NLSAX vs. WPOPX commentary
Nov 14, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is NLSAX is a Hold and WPOPX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
NLSAX has more cash in the bank: 8.07B vs. WPOPX (387M). WPOPX pays higher dividends than NLSAX: WPOPX (0.02) vs NLSAX (0.00). NLSAX was incepted earlier than WPOPX: NLSAX (14 years) vs WPOPX (20 years). NLSAX (1.68) is less costly to investors than WPOPX (1.18). NLSAX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 48.00 vs. WPOPX (25.00). NLSAX has a lower initial minimum investment than WPOPX: NLSAX (1000) vs WPOPX (1000000). NLSAX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 7.87 vs. WPOPX (-7.44). NLSAX return over 5 years is better than : 21.35 vs. WPOPX (-16.02).
| NLSAX | WPOPX | NLSAX / WPOPX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.68 | 1.18 | 142% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.68 | 1.18 | 142% |
| Fund Existence | 14 years | 20 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 7.692 | 2.036 | 378% |
| Front Load | 6% | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000 | 1000000 | 0% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 8.07B | 387M | 2,086% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.00 | 0.02 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | 7.87 | -7.44 | -106% |
| Returns for 3 years | 22.24 | 8.02 | 277% |
| Returns for 5 years | 21.35 | -16.02 | -133% |
| Returns for 10 years | 59.60 | -5.87 | -1,016% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement