Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
NLSAX vs WPOPX
NLSAX vs WPOPX Comparison
Open Charts NLSAX vs WPOPX
Neuberger Berman Long Short A
Price$19.74
Change+$0.02 (+0.10%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets7.96B
Weitz Partners III Opportunity Instl
Price$13.04
Change-$0.03 (-0.23%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets359.16M
NLSAX vs WPOPX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
NLSAX vs. WPOPX commentary
Dec 27, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is NLSAX is a Hold and WPOPX is a StrongBuy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
NLSAX has more cash in the bank: 7.96B vs. WPOPX (359M). WPOPX pays higher dividends than NLSAX: WPOPX (0.02) vs NLSAX (0.00). NLSAX was incepted earlier than WPOPX: NLSAX (14 years) vs WPOPX (20 years). NLSAX (1.68) is less costly to investors than WPOPX (1.18). NLSAX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 48.00 vs. WPOPX (25.00). NLSAX has a lower initial minimum investment than WPOPX: NLSAX (1000) vs WPOPX (1000000). NLSAX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 6.02 vs. WPOPX (-3.12). NLSAX return over 5 years is better than : 21.23 vs. WPOPX (-14.17).
| NLSAX | WPOPX | NLSAX / WPOPX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.68 | 1.18 | 142% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.68 | 1.18 | 142% |
| Fund Existence | 14 years | 20 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 6.934 | -1.659 | -418% |
| Front Load | 6% | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000 | 1000000 | 0% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 7.96B | 359M | 2,218% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.00 | 0.02 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | 6.02 | -3.12 | -193% |
| Returns for 3 years | 28.66 | 18.90 | 152% |
| Returns for 5 years | 21.23 | -14.17 | -150% |
| Returns for 10 years | 57.45 | -4.22 | -1,362% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement