Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
NLSAX vs WPOPX
NLSAX vs WPOPX Comparison
Open Charts NLSAX vs WPOPX
Neuberger Berman Long Short A
Price$19.64
Change-$0.02 (-0.10%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets7.53B
Weitz Partners III Opportunity Instl
Price$13.73
Change-$0.03 (-0.22%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets419.52M
NLSAX vs WPOPX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
NLSAX vs. WPOPX commentary
Sep 09, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is NLSAX is a Buy and WPOPX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
NLSAX has more cash in the bank: 7.53B vs. WPOPX (420M). WPOPX pays higher dividends than NLSAX: WPOPX (0.02) vs NLSAX (0.00). NLSAX was incepted earlier than WPOPX: NLSAX (14 years) vs WPOPX (20 years). NLSAX (1.68) is less costly to investors than WPOPX (1.18). NLSAX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 48.00 vs. WPOPX (25.00). NLSAX has a lower initial minimum investment than WPOPX: NLSAX (1000) vs WPOPX (1000000). NLSAX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 9.48 vs. WPOPX (0.90). NLSAX return over 5 years is better than : 23.55 vs. WPOPX (-10.57).
| NLSAX | WPOPX | NLSAX / WPOPX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.68 | 1.18 | 142% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.68 | 1.18 | 142% |
| Fund Existence | 14 years | 20 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 6.392 | 3.544 | 180% |
| Front Load | 6% | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000 | 1000000 | 0% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 7.53B | 420M | 1,793% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.00 | 0.02 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | 9.48 | 0.90 | 1,050% |
| Returns for 3 years | 19.24 | 8.15 | 236% |
| Returns for 5 years | 23.55 | -10.57 | -223% |
| Returns for 10 years | 54.65 | -8.12 | -673% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers