Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
NLSAX vs WPOPX
NLSAX vs WPOPX Comparison
Open Charts NLSAX vs WPOPX
Neuberger Berman Long Short A
Price$19.60
Change-$0.04 (-0.20%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets8.16B
Weitz Partners III Opportunity Instl
Price$12.83
Change-$0.88 (-6.42%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets352.84M
NLSAX vs WPOPX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
NLSAX vs. WPOPX commentary
Feb 04, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is NLSAX is a Buy and WPOPX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
NLSAX has more cash in the bank: 8.16B vs. WPOPX (353M). WPOPX pays higher dividends than NLSAX: WPOPX (0.47) vs NLSAX (0.00). NLSAX was incepted earlier than WPOPX: NLSAX (14 years) vs WPOPX (20 years). NLSAX (1.68) is less costly to investors than WPOPX (1.18). WPOPX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 25.00 vs. NLSAX (0.96). NLSAX has a lower initial minimum investment than WPOPX: NLSAX (1000) vs WPOPX (1000000). NLSAX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 3.43 vs. WPOPX (-6.32). NLSAX return over 5 years is better than : 19.35 vs. WPOPX (-18.99).
| NLSAX | WPOPX | NLSAX / WPOPX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.68 | 1.18 | 142% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.68 | 1.18 | 142% |
| Fund Existence | 14 years | 20 years | - |
| Gain YTD | -0.609 | -0.927 | 66% |
| Front Load | 6% | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000 | 1000000 | 0% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 8.16B | 353M | 2,312% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.00 | 0.47 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | 3.43 | -6.32 | -54% |
| Returns for 3 years | 25.30 | 4.50 | 563% |
| Returns for 5 years | 19.35 | -18.99 | -102% |
| Returns for 10 years | 64.99 | 1.30 | 5,013% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers