Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
NLSAX vs WPOIX
NLSAX vs WPOIX Comparison
Open Charts NLSAX vs WPOIX
Neuberger Berman Long Short A
Price$19.60
Change-$0.04 (-0.20%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets8.16B
Weitz Partners III Opportunity Investor
Price$11.42
Change-$0.83 (-6.78%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets357.43M
NLSAX vs WPOIX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
NLSAX vs. WPOIX commentary
Feb 04, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is NLSAX is a Buy and WPOIX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
NLSAX has more cash in the bank: 8.16B vs. WPOIX (357M). NLSAX (0.00) and WPOIX (0.00) have matching dividends . NLSAX was incepted earlier than WPOIX: NLSAX (14 years) vs WPOIX (15 years). WPOIX (1.93) is less costly to investors than NLSAX (1.68). WPOIX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 25.00 vs. NLSAX (0.96). NLSAX has a lower initial minimum investment than WPOIX: NLSAX (1000) vs WPOIX (2500). NLSAX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 3.43 vs. WPOIX (-7.53). NLSAX return over 5 years is better than : 19.35 vs. WPOIX (-24.12).
| NLSAX | WPOIX | NLSAX / WPOIX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.68 | 1.93 | 87% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.68 | 1.93 | 87% |
| Fund Existence | 14 years | 15 years | - |
| Gain YTD | -0.609 | -0.954 | 64% |
| Front Load | 6% | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000 | 2500 | 40% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 8.16B | 357M | 2,286% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.00 | 0.00 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | 3.43 | -7.53 | -46% |
| Returns for 3 years | 25.30 | 0.26 | 9,607% |
| Returns for 5 years | 19.35 | -24.12 | -80% |
| Returns for 10 years | 64.99 | -8.86 | -734% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers