Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
NLSAX vs WPOIX
NLSAX vs WPOIX Comparison
Open Charts NLSAX vs WPOIX
Neuberger Berman Long Short A
Price$19.67
Change-$0.05 (-0.25%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets7.94B
Weitz Partners III Opportunity Investor
Price$11.56
Change-$0.06 (-0.52%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets361.06M
NLSAX vs WPOIX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
NLSAX vs. WPOIX commentary
Dec 14, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is NLSAX is a Buy and WPOIX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
NLSAX has more cash in the bank: 7.94B vs. WPOIX (361M). NLSAX (0.00) and WPOIX (0.00) have matching dividends . NLSAX was incepted earlier than WPOIX: NLSAX (14 years) vs WPOIX (14 years). WPOIX (1.93) is less costly to investors than NLSAX (1.68). NLSAX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 48.00 vs. WPOIX (25.00). NLSAX has a lower initial minimum investment than WPOIX: NLSAX (1000) vs WPOIX (2500). NLSAX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 5.62 vs. WPOIX (-5.91). NLSAX return over 5 years is better than : 19.80 vs. WPOIX (-25.47).
| NLSAX | WPOIX | NLSAX / WPOIX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.68 | 1.93 | 87% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.68 | 1.93 | 87% |
| Fund Existence | 14 years | 14 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 6.826 | -2.435 | -280% |
| Front Load | 6% | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000 | 2500 | 40% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 7.94B | 361M | 2,199% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.00 | 0.00 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | 5.62 | -5.91 | -95% |
| Returns for 3 years | 19.80 | 1.31 | 1,514% |
| Returns for 5 years | 19.80 | -25.47 | -78% |
| Returns for 10 years | 59.87 | -15.55 | -385% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement